Experimental and numerical study on particle distribution in a two-zone chamber

Abstract Better understanding of aerosol dynamics is an important step for improving personal exposure assessments in indoor environments. Although the limitation of the assumptions in a well-mixed model is well known, there has been very little research reported in the published literature on the discrepancy of exposure assessments between numerical models which take account of gravitational effects and the well-mixed model. A new Eulerian-type drift-flux model has been developed to simulate particle dispersion and personal exposure in a two-zone geometry, which accounts for the drift velocity resulting from gravitational settling and diffusion. To validate the numerical model, a small-scale chamber was fabricated. The airflow characteristics and particle concentrations were measured by a phase Doppler Anemometer. Both simulated airflow and concentration profiles agree well with the experimental results. A strong inhomogeneous concentration was observed experimentally for 10μm aerosols. The computational model was further applied to study a simple hypothetical, yet more realistic scenario. The aim was to explore different levels of exposure predicted by the new model and the well-mixed model. Aerosols are initially uniformly distributed in one zone and subsequently transported and dispersed to an adjacent zone through an opening. Owing to the significant difference in the rates of transport and dispersion between aerosols and gases, inferred from the results, the well-mixed model tends to overpredict the concentration in the source zone, and under-predict the concentration in the exposed zone. The results are very useful to illustrate that the well-mixed assumption must be applied cautiously for exposure assessments as such an ideal condition may not be applied for coarse particles.

[1]  A. Lai,et al.  A new drift-flux model for particle transport and deposition in human airways. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  J Richmond-Bryant,et al.  Transport of airborne particles within a room. , 2006, Indoor air.

[3]  A. Mangili,et al.  Review Transmission , 2022 .

[4]  Clive B. Beggs,et al.  Methodology for determining the susceptibility of airborne microorganisms to irradiation by an upper-room UVGI system , 2006 .

[5]  Kathryn Brown,et al.  Up in the Air , 2004, Science.

[6]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Modeling Indoor Particle Deposition from Turbulent Flow onto Smooth Surfaces , 2000 .

[7]  C. Shy,et al.  Indoor, outdoor, and personal exposure monitoring of particulate air pollution: the Baltimore elderly epidemiology-exposure pilot study☆ , 2000 .

[8]  Y. Hardalupas,et al.  On the measurement of particle concentration near a stagnation point , 1989 .

[9]  Ashok J. Gadgil,et al.  Indoor pollutant mixing time in an isothermal closed room: An investigation using CFD , 2003 .

[10]  K. Chung,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of airflow and contaminant particle transport in a partitioned enclosure , 1998 .

[11]  Helmut E. Feustel COMIS—an international multizone air-flow and contaminant transport model , 1999 .

[12]  H. Kao,et al.  Numerical investigation of airflow pattern and particulate matter transport in naturally ventilated multi-room buildings. , 2006, Indoor air.

[13]  S. Weichenthal,et al.  Indoor ultrafine particles and childhood asthma: exploring a potential public health concern. , 2007, Indoor air.

[14]  M. P. Wan,et al.  Dispersion of Expiratory Droplets in a General Hospital Ward with Ceiling Mixing Type Mechanical Ventilation System , 2007 .

[15]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of particle transport and distribution in ventilated rooms , 2006 .

[16]  N. Klepeis,et al.  Validity of the uniform mixing assumption: determining human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  E. Cole,et al.  Characterization of infectious aerosols in health care facilities: An aid to effective engineering controls and preventive strategies , 1998, American Journal of Infection Control.

[18]  Y. Li,et al.  Role of air distribution in SARS transmission during the largest nosocomial outbreak in Hong Kong. , 2005, Indoor air.

[19]  Jianlei Niu,et al.  Modeling particle dispersion and deposition in indoor environments , 2007, Atmospheric Environment.

[20]  P V Nielsen,et al.  Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment - a multidisciplinary systematic review. , 2007, Indoor air.

[21]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method , 2004 .

[22]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Study of expiratory droplet dispersion and transport using a new Eulerian modeling approach , 2007, Atmospheric Environment.

[23]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Modeling particle deposition from fully developed turbulent flow in ventilation duct , 2006 .

[24]  Shelly L. Miller,et al.  Environmental tobacco smoke particles in multizone indoor environments , 2001 .

[25]  A. Lai,et al.  Modeling particle distribution and deposition in indoor environments with a new drift–flux model , 2006 .

[26]  A. Hubbard,et al.  Toward Understanding the Risk of Secondary Airborne Infection: Emission of Respirable Pathogens , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[27]  Helmut E. Feustel,et al.  COMIS—an international multizone air-flow and contaminant transport model , 1998 .

[28]  Derek Dunn-Rankin,et al.  Measurement and prediction of indoor air flow in a model room , 2003 .

[29]  A. Lai Particle deposition indoors: a review. , 2002, Indoor air.