Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities

Abstract Pervasive cultural stereotypes associate brilliance with men, not women. Given these stereotypes, messages suggesting that a career requires brilliance may undermine women's interest. Consistent with this hypothesis, linking success to brilliance lowered women's (but not men's) interest in a range of educational and professional opportunities introduced via hypothetical scenarios (Experiments 1–4). It also led women more than men to expect that they would feel anxious and would not belong (Experiments 2–5). These gender differences were explained in part by women's perception that they are different from the typical person in these contexts (Experiments 5 and 6). In sum, the present research reveals that certain messages—in particular, those suggesting that brilliance is essential to success—may contribute to the gender gaps that are present in many fields.

[1]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  Explaining Underrepresentation: A Theory of Precluded Interest , 2010, Sex roles.

[2]  A. Furnham,et al.  Parental Estimates of Their Own and Their Children's Intelligence , 2007 .

[3]  M. Heilman.  Gender stereotypes and workplace bias , 2012 .

[4]  M. Burkley,et al.  “Women Like Me Are Bad at Math”: The Psychological Functions of Negative Self‐Stereotyping , 2014 .

[5]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .

[6]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines , 2015, Science.

[7]  J. Petriglieri,et al.  Impossible Selves: Image Strategies and Identity Threat in Professional Women's Career Transitions , 2016 .

[8]  C. Dweck,et al.  Can everyone become highly intelligent? Cultural differences in and societal consequences of beliefs about the universal potential for intelligence. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  The Frequency of “Brilliant” and “Genius” in Teaching Evaluations Predicts the Representation of Women and African Americans across Fields , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Dominique Muller,et al.  We can do it: the interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Mere belonging: the power of social connections. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Sex bias in work settings: The Lack of Fit model. , 1983 .

[13]  C. Steele,et al.  Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  C. Dweck.  Mindset: The New Psychology of Success , 2006 .

[15]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[16]  Sara D. Hodges,et al.  When Trying Hard Isn’t Natural , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  L. Heatherington,et al.  Gender and the self-presentation of academic achievement , 1992 .

[18]  Robert J. Gould,et al.  The "Feminine Modesty" Effect , 1982 .

[19]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale , 2001 .

[20]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model , 2011 .

[21]  M. Bennett.  Self-Estimates of Ability in Men and Women , 1997 .

[22]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Sarah-Jane Leslie,et al.  Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Joachim Tiedemann.  Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics , 2000 .

[25]  S. Spencer,et al.  Consuming Images: How Television Commercials that Elicit Stereotype Threat Can Restrain Women Academically and Professionally , 2002 .

[26]  Sapna Cheryan,et al.  Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others? , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Chris S. Hulleman,et al.  Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes , 2009, Science.

[28]  H. Paine,et al.  Girls and Women , 2007 .

[29]  C. Dweck.  Self-theories and goals: their role in motivation, personality, and development. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[30]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Advances in mediation analysis: a survey and synthesis of new developments. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  Oksana Smal,et al.  POLITICAL DISCOURSE CONTENT ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF A COMPUTERIZED TEXT ANALYSIS PROGRAM LINGUISTIC INQUIRY AND WORD COUNT (LIWC) , 2020, Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu «Ostrozʹka akademìâ». Serìâ «Fìlologìâ».

[32]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[33]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  "Who am I? Why am I here?": self-esteem, self-clarity, and prototype matching. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Lawrence H. Summers,et al.  Remarks at NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce , 2005 .

[35]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  "I am us": negative stereotypes as collective threats. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Загоровская Ольга Владимировна,et al.  Исследование влияния пола и психологических характеристик автора на количественные параметры его текста с использованием программы Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count , 2015 .

[37]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence , 2002 .

[38]  Frank M. Shipman,et al.  Experiences surveying the crowd: reflections on methods, participation, and reliability , 2013, WebSci.

[39]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Myra Luna-Lucero,et al.  Light Bulbs or Seeds? How Metaphors for Ideas Influence Judgments About Genius , 2017 .

[41]  Gregory M. Walton,et al.  A Brief Social-Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students , 2011, Science.

[42]  M. Murphy,et al.  A Company I Can Trust? Organizational Lay Theories Moderate Stereotype Threat for Women , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[43]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  The Brilliance Trap. , 2017, Scientific American.

[44]  S. Ceci,et al.  Women in Academic Science , 2014, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[45]  Charles A. Malgwi,et al.  Influences on Students' Choice of College Major , 2005 .

[46]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  B. Hannover,et al.  Self-to-Prototype Matching as a Strategy for Making Academic Choices. Why High School Students Do Not like Math and Science. , 2004 .

[48]  David Lubinski,et al.  Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  M. Bennett,et al.  Men's and women's self-estimates of intelligence. , 1996, The Journal of social psychology.

[50]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Linking Stereotype Threat and Anxiety , 2007 .

[51]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Prototype matching: a strategy for social decision making. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[53]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Evidence That Gendered Wording in Job Advertisements Exists and Sustains Gender Inequality , 2011 .

[54]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Temporal Distance and Discrimination , 2012, Psychological science.

[55]  C. Steele.  Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do , 2011 .

[56]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  J. Gross,et al.  Signaling Threat , 2007, Psychological science.

[58]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.

[59]  Andrei Cimpian,et al.  Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests , 2017, Science.

[60]  Jane Stout,et al.  Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2014 .

[61]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat , 2003 .

[62]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  D. Geary.  Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences , 1998 .

[64]  J. Eccles,et al.  The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis , 1992 .

[65]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis.  Demographics of Mechanical Turk , 2010 .

[66]  D. Oyserman.  Possible Selves Identity-based Motivation and School Success , 2008 .

[67]  Carol Sansone,et al.  The Role of Interest in Understanding the Career Choices of Female and Male College Students , 2001 .

[68]  Catherine Good,et al.  Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.