Dairy cow handling facilities and the perception of Beef Quality Assurance on Colorado dairies.

A survey was conducted on Colorado dairies to assess attitudes and practices regarding Dairy Beef Quality Assurance (DBQA). The objectives were to (1) assess the need for a new handling facility that would allow all injections to be administered via DBQA standards; (2) establish if Colorado dairy producers are concerned with DBQA; and (3) assess differences in responses between dairy owners and herdsmen. Of the 95 dairies contacted, 20 (21%) agreed to participate, with a median herd size of 1,178. When asked to rank the following 7 traits--efficiency, animal safety, human safety, ease of animal handling, ease of operation, inject per Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) procedures, and cost--in order of priority when designing a new handling facility, human and animal safety were ranked highest in priority (first or second) by the majority of participants, with ease of animal handling and efficiency ranked next. Interestingly, the administration of injections per BQA standards was ranked sixth or seventh by most participants. Respondents estimated the average annual income from the sale of cull cows to be 4.6% of all dairy income, with 50% receiving at least one carcass discount or condemnation in the past 12 mo. Although almost all of the participating dairy farmers stated that the preferred injection site for medications was the neck region, a significant number admitted to using alternate injection sites. In contrast, no difference was found between responses regarding the preferred and actual location for intravenous injections. Although most participating producers are aware of BQA injection guidelines, they perceive efficiency as more important, which could result in injections being administered in locations not promoted by BQA. Dairy owners and herdsmen disagreed in whether or not workers had been injured in the animal handling area in the last 12 mo. Handling facilities that allow for an efficient and safe way to administer drugs according to BQA guidelines and educational opportunities that highlight the effect of improved DBQA on profitability could prove useful. Dairy producers play a key role in ensuring that dairy beef is safe and high quality, and just as they are committed to producing safe and nutritious milk for their customers, they should be committed to producing the best quality beef.

[1]  R J Grant,et al.  Invited review: Sustainability of the US dairy industry. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  Cecilia Lindahl,et al.  Occupational Health and Safety Aspects of Animal Handling in Dairy Production , 2013, Journal of agromedicine.

[3]  D. Vanoverbeke,et al.  Quality defects in market beef and dairy cows and bulls sold through livestock auction markets in the Western United States: II. Relative effects on selling price. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[4]  D. Vanoverbeke,et al.  Survey of quality defects in market beef and dairy cows and bulls sold through livestock auction markets in the Western United States: I. Incidence rates. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[5]  M. Chahine,et al.  Assessment of management and basic beef quality assurance practices on Idaho dairies. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  K. Dhuyvetter,et al.  Influence of variable milk quality premiums on observed milk quality. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  G. Edwards‐Jones,et al.  Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges , 2006 .

[8]  D. Bailey,et al.  Adoption of security systems by dairy farms to address bioterrorist threats in the intermountain United States. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  L. Holden,et al.  Do Dairy Producers Use Effective Management Practices to Improve the Value of Market Cows?1 , 2005 .

[10]  Sigrid S. Glenn,et al.  Complexity and Selection: Implications for Organizational Change , 2004 .

[11]  M. Looper,et al.  On-farm management decisions to improve beef quality of market dairy cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  D. Roeber MEAT QUALITY AND DAIRY VETERINARY PRACTICE , 2003 .

[13]  R. W. Palmer,et al.  Animal Handling Procedures and Facilities Used by Dairy Producers to Conduct Health and Reproductive Examinations , 2002 .

[14]  J. Sofos,et al.  Frequencies of injection-site lesions in muscles from rounds of dairy and beef cow carcasses. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  National market cow and bull beef quality audit-1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[16]  W. Bickert Dairy freestall housing and equipment , 2000 .

[17]  C. Bruhn,et al.  On-farm quality assurance programs: a survey of producer and industry leader opinions. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.