Conservative reliability index for epistemic uncertainty in reliability-based design optimization

In this paper, a simple but efficient concept of epistemic reliability index (ERI) is introduced for sampling uncertainty in input random variables under conditions where the input variables are independent Gaussian, and samples are unbiased. The increased uncertainty due to the added epistemic uncertainty requires a higher level of target reliability, which is called the conservative reliability index (CRI). In this paper, it is assumed that CRI can additively be decomposed into the aleatory part (the target reliability index) and the epistemic part (the ERI). It is shown theoretically and numerically that ERI remains same for different designs, which is critically important for computational efficiency in reliability-based design optimization. Novel features of the proposed ERI include: (a) it is unnecessary to have a double-loop uncertainty quantification for handling both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty; (b) the effect of two different sources of uncertainty can be separated so that designers can better understand the optimization outcome; and (c) the ERI needs to be calculated once and remains the same throughout the design process. The proposed method is demonstrated with two analytical and one numerical examples.

[1]  David Gorsich,et al.  Conservative reliability-based design optimization method with insufficient input data , 2016 .

[2]  David Gorsich,et al.  Confidence Level Estimation and Design Sensitivity Analysis for Confidence-Based RBDO , 2012, DAC 2012.

[3]  Nam H. Kim,et al.  How coupon and element tests reduce conservativeness in element failure prediction , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization , 2004 .

[5]  Houfei Fang,et al.  Actuator grouping optimization on flexible space reflectors , 2011, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[7]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[8]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Calculation of reactor accident safety goals , 1993 .

[9]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Reliability-Based Optimization With Incomplete Information , 2006, DAC 2006.

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An evolutionary based Bayesian design optimization approach under incomplete information , 2013 .

[11]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[12]  Alaa Chateauneuf,et al.  Benchmark study of numerical methods for reliability-based design optimization , 2010 .

[13]  Kosei Ishimura,et al.  Development of a smart reconfigurable reflector prototype for an extremely high-frequency antenna , 2016 .

[14]  G. Matheron Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[15]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Reliability-based Structural Design , 2006 .