BackgroundA large part of our knowledge on the world's species is recorded in the corpus of biodiversity literature with well over hundred million pages, and is represented in natural history collections estimated at 2 – 3 billion specimens. But this body of knowledge is almost entirely in paper-print form and is not directly accessible through the Internet. For the digitization of this literature, new territories have to be chartered in the fields of technical, legal and social issues that presently impede its advance. The taxonomic literature seems especially destined for such a transformation.DiscussionPlazi was founded as an association with the primary goal of transforming both the printed and, more recently, "born-digital" taxonomic literature into semantically enabled, enhanced documents. This includes the creation of a test body of literature, an XML schema modeling its logic content (TaxonX), the development of a mark-up editor (GoldenGATE) allowing also the enhancement of documents with links to external resources via Life Science Identifiers (LSID), a repository for publications and issuance of bibliographic identifiers, a dedicated server to serve the marked up content (the Plazi Search and Retrieval Server, SRS) and semantic tools to mine information. Plazi's workflow is designed to respect copyright protection and achieves extraction by observing exceptions and limitations existent in international copyright law.ConclusionThe information found in Plazi's databases – taxonomic treatments as well as the metadata of the publications – are in the public domain and can therefore be used for further scientific research without any restriction, whether or not contained in copyrighted publications.
[1]
Klemens Böhm,et al.
Creating Digital Resources from Legacy Documents: An Experience Report from the Biosystematics Domain
,
2009,
ESWC.
[2]
botanical libraries,et al.
Biodiversity Heritage Library
,
2009
.
[3]
Klemens Böhm,et al.
A combining approach to Find All taxon names (FAT) in legacy biosystematics literature
,
2006
.
[4]
Willi Egloff.
Das Urheberrecht und der Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Publikationen
,
2007
.
[5]
A. Cropper.
Convention on Biological Diversity
,
1993,
Environmental Conservation.
[6]
C. W. Stiles,et al.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
,
1916,
Nature.
[7]
John McNeill,et al.
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
,
1983
.
[8]
Brian L. Fisher,et al.
A Revision of Malagasy Species of Anochetus Mayr and Odontomachus Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
,
2008,
PloS one.
[9]
A. Polaszek.
A universal register for animal names
,
2005,
Nature.
[10]
Roderic D. M. Page,et al.
Biodiversity informatics: the challenge of linking data and the role of shared identifiers
,
2008,
Briefings Bioinform..
[11]
Benvenuto Samson.
Das neue Urheberrecht
,
1966
.
[12]
Jörg Reinbothe,et al.
WIPO yin te wang tiao yue ping zhu (Chinesische Übersetzung von: Reinbothe/von Lewinski: The WIPO Treaties, London: Butterworths 2002)
,
2007
.
[13]
Reto M. Hilty.
Das Urheberrecht und der Wissenschaftler
,
2006
.
[14]
Klemens Böhm,et al.
A QUANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF XML SCHEMAS FOR TAXONOMIC PUBLICATIONS
,
2007
.
[15]
Arthur Curti.
Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht
,
1927
.