Different neural adjustments improve endpoint accuracy with practice in young and old adults.

The purpose of the study was to determine the practice-induced adjustments in the motor-output variability and the agonist-antagonist activity that accompanied improvements in endpoint accuracy of goal-directed isometric contractions in young and old adults. Young and old adults performed 100 trials that involved accurately matching the peak of a force trajectory (25% maximum) to a target force in 150 ms. Endpoint accuracy was quantified as the absolute difference between the target and the peak force and time-to-peak force. Motor-output variability was expressed as the SDs of the force trajectory, peak force, and time-to-peak force. The force and time errors differed between the two groups initially, but after 35 practice trials the errors were similar for the two groups. Reductions in force endpoint error were predicted by decreases in the variability of the force trajectory for both groups, adaptations in the agonist (first dorsal interosseus) and antagonist (second palmar interosseus) EMG for young adults, and adaptations only for the agonist EMG for old adults. Reductions in time endpoint error were predicted by increases in the SD of time-to-peak force and a longer delay to the peak EMG of the antagonist muscle for young adults, but by decreases in the SDs of time-to-peak force and force trajectory and a shorter delay to the peak EMG of the antagonist muscle for the old adults. The findings indicate that the neural adjustments underlying the improvement in endpoint accuracy with practice differed for young and old adults.

[1]  C. Ghez,et al.  EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contraction in man: Relations to response dynamics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  K. Newell.  Knowledge Of Results And Motor Learning , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[3]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Bernard E. Tomlinson,et al.  Cell counts in human cerebral cortex in normal adults throughout life using an image analysing computer , 1980, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[6]  J. Cooke,et al.  Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  S. Jaric,et al.  Practice improves even the simplest movements , 1988, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[9]  R. Enoka,et al.  Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. IV. Implications for isometric contractions. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  W G Darling,et al.  Movement related EMGs become more variable during learning of fast accurate movements. , 1987, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  KM Spiegel,et al.  The influence of age on the assessment of motor unit activation in a human hand muscle , 1996, Experimental physiology.

[14]  J. Cooke,et al.  Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans , 1989, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  S. Jaric,et al.  Principles for learning single-joint movements. I. Enhanced performance by practice. , 1993, Experimental brain research.

[16]  M L Latash,et al.  Organizing principles for single joint movements: V. Agonist-antagonist interactions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Roger M Enoka,et al.  Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  A. Wiegner,et al.  Accuracy of motor responses in subjects with and without control of antagonist muscle. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  K. Newell,et al.  Aging and rhythmical force output: loss of adaptive control of multiple neural oscillators. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  L. Carlton,et al.  Age and contraction type influence motor output variability in rapid discrete tasks. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  F. Valero-Cuevas.  Predictive modulation of muscle coordination pattern magnitude scales fingertip force magnitude over the voluntary range. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[25]  D. Corcos,et al.  Organizing principles for single-joint movements. II. A speed-sensitive strategy. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Matthews,et al.  Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  R. Enoka,et al.  Fluctuations in acceleration during voluntary contractions lead to greater impairment of movement accuracy in old adults. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  J R Simon,et al.  The effect of aging on the stages of processing in a choice reaction time task. , 1978, Journal of gerontology.

[29]  K. Newell,et al.  The generalization of perceptual-motor intra-individual variability in young and old adults. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[30]  R. Enoka,et al.  Coactivation of the antagonist muscle does not covary with steadiness in old adults. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Coactivation to reduce variability in the elderly. , 1998, Motor control.

[32]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Halla B. Olafsdottir,et al.  Age-related changes in multifinger synergies in accurate moment of force production tasks. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[35]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh : Analyzing and Understanding Data , 2004 .

[36]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[37]  M. Latash,et al.  Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[38]  K. Newell,et al.  Changing complexity in human behavior and physiology through aging and disease , 2002, Neurobiology of Aging.

[39]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Neuronal variability: noise or part of the signal? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  M. Latash,et al.  Accurate production of time-varying patterns of the moment of force in multi-finger tasks , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Roger M Enoka,et al.  Nonuniform activation of the agonist muscle does not covary with index finger acceleration in old adults. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[43]  R. Enoka,et al.  Practice reduces motor unit discharge variability in a hand muscle and improves manual dexterity in old adults. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[44]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  M. Kawato,et al.  Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  P. A. Lewis,et al.  Brain activity correlates differentially with increasing temporal complexity of rhythms during initialisation, synchronisation, and continuation phases of paced finger tapping , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  T. Doherty.  Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[48]  Edmund Y. S. Chao,et al.  Biomechanics of the hand : a basic research study , 1989 .

[49]  Zong-Ming Li,et al.  Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[50]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Age-related changes in complexity depend on task dynamics. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[51]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  The role of execution noise in movement variability. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  R. Sainburg.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  P Cordo,et al.  Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: role of velocity and position information. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.