A methodology for the multi-objective shape optimization of thin noise barriers

Abstract The approach of this paper is based on the evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) of very thin noise barrier models with improved performance idealized as single-wire designs. To assume such a simplification of reality, the dual boundary element (DBE) formulation for assessing the acoustic efficiency arises as the most appropriate strategy involving BE to avoid drawbacks associated with the exclusive implementation of the standard formulation (SBE). The 2D analysis performed in this work focuses on the simultaneous optimization of two objectives in conflict using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II): the maximization of noise attenuation and the minimization of the amount of material used in manufacturing the barrier, represented by the overall length of its elements (this function is closely related to the final cost of the device). Under this framework, two optimization strategies are compared for each model with equal number of fitness evaluations: (1) when considering a random initial population and (2) when including the best single-objective optimal design in the initial population. The results obtained show wide and uniformly spread-out non-dominated fronts, reflected in the geometric diversity featured by optimal designs; statistical analysis confirm the advantages of the latter initial population strategy.

[1]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization , 2015 .

[2]  David Greiner,et al.  Shape design of Noise Barriers using evolutionary optimization and boundary elements , 2006 .

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiobjective optimization , 1997 .

[4]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Mark Wineberg,et al.  Statistical analysis for evolutionary computation: introduction , 2009, GECCO '09.

[6]  S. Chandler-Wilde,et al.  EFFICIENCY OF SINGLE NOISE BARRIERS , 1991 .

[7]  David Greiner,et al.  Advances in Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design, Optimization and Control in Engineering and Sciences , 2016 .

[8]  H. Hong,et al.  Derivations of Integral Equations of Elasticity , 1988 .

[9]  Luiz C. Wrobel,et al.  A DUAL BOUNDARY ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR SOUND PROPAGATION AROUND BARRIERS OVER AN IMPEDANCE PLANE , 1997 .

[10]  David Greiner,et al.  Robust Design of Noise Attenuation Barriers with Evolutionary Multiobjective Algorithms and the Boundary Element Method , 2009, EMO.

[11]  Student,et al.  THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN , 1908 .

[12]  T. A. Cruse,et al.  Smoothness–relaxation strategies for singular and hypersingular integral equations , 1998 .

[13]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[14]  H. Lilliefors.  On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[15]  David Greiner,et al.  Shape design optimization of road acoustic barriers featuring top-edge devices by using genetic algorithms and boundary elements , 2016 .

[16]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field , 2006, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag..

[17]  H. Hong,et al.  Review of Dual Boundary Element Methods With Emphasis on Hypersingular Integrals and Divergent Series , 1999 .

[18]  António Tadeu,et al.  Sound pressure level attenuation provided by thin rigid screens coupled to tall buildings , 2007 .

[19]  Jeng-Tzong Chen,et al.  Recent development of dual BEM in acoustic problems , 2000 .

[20]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  J. Aznárez,et al.  Optimization of thin noise barrier designs using Evolutionary Algorithms and a Dual BEM Formulation , 2015 .

[22]  David Greiner,et al.  Single- and multi-objective shape design of Y-noise barriers using evolutionary computation and boundary elements , 2010, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[23]  Ivo F. Sbalzariniy,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2000 .

[24]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[25]  Jeng-Tzong Chen,et al.  Dual integral formulation for determining the acoustic modes of a two-dimensional cavity with a degenerate boundary , 1998 .

[26]  J. Aznárez,et al.  A 2D BEM–FEM approach for time harmonic fluid–structure interaction analysis of thin elastic bodies , 2014 .

[27]  Martin Ochmann,et al.  Boundary Element Acoustics Fundamentals and Computer Codes , 2002 .

[28]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An integrated approach to automated innovization for discovering useful design principles: Case studies from engineering , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[29]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Boundary integral equations for thin bodies , 1994 .

[30]  J. Telles.  A self-adaptive co-ordinate transformation for efficient numerical evaluation of general boundary element integrals , 1987 .

[31]  Yijun Liu,et al.  Analysis of two-dimensional thin structures (from micro- to nano-scales) using the boundary element method , 1998 .

[32]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[33]  A. Tadeu,et al.  Simulation of sound absorption in 2D thin elements using a coupled BEM/TBEM formulation in the presence of fixed and moving 3D sources , 2012 .

[34]  S. Marburg.  Discretization Requirements: How many Elements per Wavelength are Necessary? , 2008 .