Performance of standard fluoroscopy antiscatter grids in flat-detector-based cone-beam CT

In this paper, the performance of focused lamellar anti-scatter grids, which are currently used in fluoroscopy, is studied in order to determine guidelines of grid usage for flat detector based cone beam CT. The investigation aims at obtaining the signal to noise ratio improvement factor by the use of anti-scatter grids. First, the results of detailed Monte Carlo simulations as well as measurements are presented. From these the general characteristics of the impinging field of scattered and primary photons are derived. Phantoms modeling the head, thorax and pelvis regions have been studied for various imaging geometries with varying phantom size, cone and fan angles and patient-detector distances. Second, simulation results are shown for ideally focused and vacuum spaced grids as best case approach as well as for grids with realistic spacing materials. The grid performance is evaluated by means of the primary and scatter transmission and the signal to noise ratio improvement factor as function of imaging geometry and grid parameters. For a typical flat detector cone beam CT setup, the grid selectivity and thus the performance of anti-scatter grids is much lower compared to setups where the grid is located directly behind the irradiated object. While for small object-to-grid distances a standard grid improves the SNR, the SNR for geometries as used in flat detector based cone beam CT is deteriorated by the use of an anti-scatter grid for many application scenarios. This holds even for the pelvic region. Standard fluoroscopy anti-scatter grids were found to decrease the SNR in many application scenarios of cone beam CT due to the large patient-detector distance and have, therefore, only a limited benefit in flat detector based cone beam CT.

[1]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Scatter-glare estimation for digital radiographic systems: comparison of digital filtration and sampling techniques , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Falko Busse,et al.  Design and performance of a high-quality cardiac flat detector , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Masahiro Endo,et al.  Effect of scatter radiation on image noise in cone-beam CT , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Georg Rose,et al.  Image quality of flat-panel cone beam CT , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  John H. Hubbell,et al.  A Review, Bibliography, and Tabulation of K, L, and Higher Atomic Shell X‐Ray Fluorescence Yields , 1994 .

[7]  Jens-Peter Schlomka,et al.  Coherent-scatter computed tomography applying a fan-beam geometry , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  J A Seibert,et al.  X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. , 1988, Medical physics.

[10]  H Bernstein,et al.  A detailed experimental and theoretical comparison of the angular and energy dependencies of grid transmission. , 1983, Medical physics.

[11]  Jim Malone,et al.  Computerized scatter correction in diagnostic radiology , 1997 .

[12]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Compton scatter effects in CT reconstructions , 1982 .

[13]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  XCOM: Photon Cross Section Database (version 1.2) , 1999 .

[14]  U Neitzel,et al.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[15]  G H Glover,et al.  Compton scatter effects in CT reconstructions. , 1983, Medical physics.

[16]  J Persliden,et al.  Scatter rejection by air gaps in diagnostic radiology. Calculations using a Monte Carlo collision density method and consideration of molecular interference in coherent scattering. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Moshi Geso,et al.  Measurement and modeling of x-ray scatter using lead discs in digital fluoroscopy , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections , 1975 .