Forest Remnants Along Urban-Rural Gradients: Examining Their Potential for Global Change Research

Over the next century, ecosystems throughout the world will be responding to rapid changes in climate and rising levels of carbon dioxide, inorganic N and ozone. Because people depend on biological systems for water, food and other ecosystem services, predicting the range of responses to global change for various ecosystem types in different geographic locations is a high priority. Modeling exercises and manipulative experimentation have been the principle approaches used to place upper and lower bounds on community and ecosystem responses. However, each of these approaches has recognized limitations. Manipulative experiments cannot vary all the relevant factors and are often performed at small spatio-temporal scales. Modeling is limited by data availability and by our knowledge of how current observations translate into future conditions. These weaknesses would improve if we could observe ecosystems that have already responded to global change factors and thus presage shifts in ecosystem structure and function. Here we consider whether urban forest remnants might offer this ability. As urban forests have been exposed to elevated temperature, carbon dioxide, nitrogen deposition and ozone for many decades, they may be ahead of the global change “response curve” for forests in their region. Therefore, not only might forests along urbanization gradients provide us with natural experiments for studying current responses to global change factors, but their legacy of response to past urbanization may also constitute space-for-time substitution experiments for predicting likely regional forest responses to continued environmental change. For this approach to be successful, appropriate criteria must be developed for selecting forest remnants and plots that would optimize our ability to detect incipient forest responses to spatial variation in global change factors along urbanization gradients, while minimizing artifacts associated with remnant size and factors other than those that simulate global change. Studying forests that meet such criteria along urban-to-rural gradients could become an informative part of a mixed strategy of approaches for improving forecasts of forest ecosystem change at the regional scale.

[1]  Finzi,et al.  Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment , 1999, Science.

[2]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change 2001 , 2001 .

[3]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Atmospheric CO 2 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network , 1994 .

[4]  H. Rogers,et al.  Response of Plants to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 , 1999 .

[5]  M. Saurer,et al.  Environmental information from stable isotopes in tree rings of Fagus sylvatica , 1998 .

[6]  Mary L. Cadenasso,et al.  Forest Edges as Nutrient and Pollutant Concentrators: Potential Synergisms between Fragmentation, Forest Canopies, and the Atmosphere , 2001 .

[7]  P. Curtis,et al.  Atmospheric Co2, Soil‐N Availability, And Allocation Of Biomass And Nitrogen By Populus Tremuloides , 2000 .

[8]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[9]  G. Lovett,et al.  Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban - rural gradient. , 2000 .

[10]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  The nitrogen budget of a pine forest under free air CO2 enrichment , 2002, Oecologia.

[11]  R. Michener,et al.  Stable isotopes in ecology and environmental science , 1995 .

[12]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[13]  S. Pickett,et al.  Forest-Landscape Structure along an Urban-To-Rural Gradient* , 1995, The Professional Geographer.

[14]  H. Neumann,et al.  Ozone deposition onto a deciduous forest during dry and wet conditions , 1992 .

[15]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  MICROBIAL ENZYME SHIFTS EXPLAIN LITTER DECAY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED NITROGEN DEPOSITION , 2000 .

[16]  L. Ziska,et al.  Cities as harbingers of climate change: common ragweed, urbanization, and public health. , 2003, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[17]  Glenn R. Matlack,et al.  MICROENVIRONMENT VARIATION WITHIN AND AMONG FOREST EDGE SITES IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES , 1993 .

[18]  L. Iverson,et al.  Global Change in Forests: Responses of Species, Communities, and Biomes , 2001 .

[19]  G. Matlack Sociological edge effects: Spatial distribution of human impact in suburban forest fragments , 1993 .

[20]  Gordon M. Heisler,et al.  The tale of two climates-Baltimore and Phoenix urban LTER sites , 2000 .

[21]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama,et al.  Basics of structural equation modeling , 1997 .

[22]  J. Garrec,et al.  The growth and gas exchange response of soil-planted Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] and red oak (Quercus rubra L.) exposed to elevated CO2 and to naturally occurring drought. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[23]  James N. Galloway,et al.  Reactive Nitrogen: Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2002, Ambio.

[24]  T. Hiyama,et al.  Diurnal variation of CO2 concentration, Δ14C and δ13C in an urban forest: estimate of the anthropogenic and biogenic CO2 contributions , 2002 .

[25]  Ingegärd Eliasson,et al.  The influence of green areas on nocturnal temperatures in a high latitude city (Göteborg, Sweden) , 1998 .

[26]  E. Pendall,et al.  Tracing Changes in Ecosystem Function under Elevated Carbon Dioxide Conditions , 2003 .

[27]  Carlos A. Cardelino,et al.  Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone , 1990 .

[28]  J. Mackenzie,et al.  Air Pollution's Toll on Forests and Crops , 1990 .

[29]  A. J. Friedland,et al.  Trace metal content of the forest floor in the green mountains of Vermont: Spatial and temporal patterns , 1984 .

[30]  A. Lugo,et al.  Climate Change and Forest Disturbances , 2001 .

[31]  K. Nadelhoffer Nitrogen isotope studies in forest ecosystems. , 1994 .

[32]  S. Pickett,et al.  Soil Characteristics of Oak Stands along an Urban‐Rural Land‐Use Gradient , 1995 .

[33]  M. Carreiro,et al.  Effects of Damage to Living Plants on Leaf Litter Quality , 1996 .

[34]  J. Bunce Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide , 1992 .

[35]  H. Mooney,et al.  Carbon dioxide and environmental stress , 1999 .

[36]  W. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen Saturation in Temperate Forest Ecosystems Hypotheses revisited , 2000 .

[37]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide and its isotopic composition in an urban atmosphere: Anthropogenic and biogenic effects , 2003 .

[38]  R. Sepanski,et al.  TRENDS '90: A compendium of data on global change , 1991 .

[39]  J. Melillo,et al.  Effects of Soil Warming on Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling , 2000 .

[40]  US National Climate Change Assessment on Forest Ecosystems: An Introduction , 2001 .

[41]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Ecological Climatology: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[42]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen Saturation in Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 1998 .

[43]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[44]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[45]  Christian Körner,et al.  Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment. , 2000 .

[46]  T. Oke The Heat Island of the Urban Boundary Layer: Characteristics, Causes and Effects , 1995 .

[47]  Sophia M. Gehlhausen,et al.  Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed-mesophytic forest fragments , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[48]  R. Lal Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect , 1995 .

[49]  R. Norby Oaks in a high-CO2 world , 1996 .

[50]  A. Prasad,et al.  PREDICTING ABUNDANCE OF 80 TREE SPECIES FOLLOWING CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[51]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[52]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  Validating models of ecosystem response to global change , 1996 .

[53]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[54]  F. Götz Ozone in the Atmosphere , 1951 .

[55]  Craig D. Idso,et al.  Seasonal and diurnal variations of near-surface atmospheric CO2 concentration within a residential sector of the urban CO2 dome of Phoenix, AZ, USA , 2002 .

[56]  J. Schnoor,et al.  Nitrogen fixation: Anthropogenic enhancement‐environmental response , 1995 .

[57]  T. Spies,et al.  Growing‐Season Microclimatic Gradients from Clearcut Edges into Old‐Growth Douglas‐Fir Forests , 1995 .

[58]  S. Running,et al.  Satellite Evidence of Phenological Differences Between Urbanized and Rural Areas of the Eastern United States Deciduous Broadleaf Forest , 2002, Ecosystems.

[59]  Dale W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen on Growth and Nitrogen Uptake in Ponderosa and Loblolly Pine , 1998 .

[60]  P. Reich,et al.  Elevated carbon dioxide ameliorates the effects of ozone on photosynthesis and growth: species respond similarly regardless of photosynthetic pathway or plant functional group. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[61]  G. Dongarrà,et al.  δ13C variations in tree rings as an indication of severe changes in the urban air quality , 2002 .

[62]  J. Aber,et al.  Long-term effects of experimental nitrogen additions on foliar litter decay and humus formation in forest ecosystems , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[63]  John L. Innes,et al.  The impacts of climate variability on forests , 1998 .

[64]  T. Dawson,et al.  Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City , 2003, Nature.

[65]  J. Aber,et al.  Regional Impacts of Climate Change and Elevated Carbon Dioxide on Forest Productivity , 2000 .

[66]  S. Ollinger,et al.  Regional Impacts of Ozone on Forest Productivity , 2000 .

[67]  J. Amthor Increasing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration, Water Use, and Water Stress: Scaling Up from the Plant to the Landscape , 1999 .

[68]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[69]  R. Neilson,et al.  Forest Processes and Global Environmental Change: Predicting the Effects of Individual and Multiple Stressors , 2001 .

[70]  G. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives , 1990 .

[71]  Vemap Participants Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[72]  F. Chapin,et al.  Global Warming and Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis , 2000 .

[73]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative to Long-Term Studies , 1989 .

[74]  Jiri Nekovar,et al.  Phenology in central Europe – differences and trends of spring phenophases in urban and rural areas , 2000, International journal of biometeorology.

[75]  J. Cermák Wind climate in cities , 1995 .

[76]  C. S. B. Grimmonda,et al.  Local-scale fluxes of carbon dioxide in urban environments : methodological challenges and results from Chicago , 2001 .

[77]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Successional Status, Seed Size, and Responses of Tree Seedlings to CO^2, Light, and Nutrients , 1993 .