Systems analysis of cellular networks under uncertainty

Besides the often‐quoted complexity of cellular networks, the prevalence of uncertainties about components, interactions, and their quantitative features provides a largely underestimated hallmark of current systems biology. This uncertainty impedes the development of mechanistic mathematical models to achieve a true systems‐level understanding. However, there is increasing evidence that theoretical approaches from diverse scientific domains can extract relevant biological knowledge efficiently, even from poorly characterized biological systems. As a common denominator, the methods focus on structural, rather than more detailed, kinetic network properties. A deeper understanding, better scaling, and the ability to combine the approaches pose formidable challenges for future theory developments.

[1]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Functional States of the Genome-Scale Escherichia Coli Transcriptional Regulatory System , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  R. Jackson,et al.  General mass action kinetics , 1972 .

[3]  S. Schuster,et al.  Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation , 2002, Nature.

[4]  Christof Schütte,et al.  Discrimination of dynamical system models for biological and chemical processes , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  Chris Cosner,et al.  Book Review: Monotone dynamical systems: An introduction to the theory of competitive and cooperative systems , 1996 .

[6]  Carsten Conradi,et al.  Analysis of Degenerate Chemical Reaction Networks , 2009 .

[7]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  M. Feinberg The existence and uniqueness of steady states for a class of chemical reaction networks , 1995 .

[9]  Bernhard O Palsson,et al.  The global transcriptional regulatory network for metabolism in Escherichia coli exhibits few dominant functional states. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Stochasticity and Cell Fate , 2008, Science.

[11]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  C. Lemieux Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling , 2009 .

[13]  B. Palsson,et al.  Network analysis of intermediary metabolism using linear optimization. I. Development of mathematical formalism. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  J. Förster,et al.  Design and application of genome-scale reconstructed metabolic models. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  Jörg Raisch,et al.  Subnetwork analysis reveals dynamic features of complex (bio)chemical networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  On the Undecidability among Kinetic Models: From Model Selection to Model Averaging , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  V. Shahrezaei,et al.  The stochastic nature of biochemical networks. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[18]  Bas Teusink,et al.  Understanding the Adaptive Growth Strategy of Lactobacillus plantarum by In Silico Optimisation , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Proteome coverage prediction with infinite Markov models , 2009, Bioinform..

[20]  B. L. Clarke Stoichiometric network analysis , 2008, Cell Biophysics.

[21]  Joerg Stelling,et al.  Structural Sensitivity Analysis of Metabolic Networks , 2008 .

[22]  Jörg Stelling,et al.  Large-scale computation of elementary flux modes with bit pattern trees , 2008, Bioinform..

[23]  A Kremling,et al.  Exploiting the bootstrap method for quantifying parameter confidence intervals in dynamical systems. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[24]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Circuits: Predicting Numbers from Alphabets , 2009, Science.

[25]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Eduardo D. Sontag Structure and stability of certain chemical networks and applications to the kinetic proofreading model of T-cell receptor signal transduction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[27]  J. Stelling,et al.  Ensemble modeling for analysis of cell signaling dynamics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Uri Alon,et al.  Sensitivity and Robustness in Chemical Reaction Networks , 2009, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[29]  S. Schuster,et al.  Can the whole be less than the sum of its parts? Pathway analysis in genome-scale metabolic networks using elementary flux patterns. , 2009, Genome research.

[30]  Houman Owhadi,et al.  Rigorous verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification through concentration-of-measure inequalities , 2008 .

[31]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[32]  M. Feinberg,et al.  Understanding bistability in complex enzyme-driven reaction networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  D. Fell,et al.  A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  W Wiechert,et al.  Unravelling the regulatory structure of biochemical networks using stimulus response experiments and large-scale model selection. , 2006, Systems biology.

[35]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[36]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  The Chemical Genomic Portrait of Yeast: Uncovering a Phenotype for All Genes , 2008, Science.

[37]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Linking data to models: data regression , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  E D Gilles,et al.  Using chemical reaction network theory to discard a kinetic mechanism hypothesis. , 2005, Systems biology.

[40]  G. Church,et al.  Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks , 2002 .

[41]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Comparison of network-based pathway analysis methods. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[42]  J Schaber,et al.  Nested uncertainties in biochemical models. , 2009, IET systems biology.

[43]  Mario Sznaier,et al.  Robust Systems Theory and Applications , 1998 .

[44]  David Angeli,et al.  Multi-stability in monotone input/output systems , 2003, Syst. Control. Lett..

[45]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[46]  Martin Feinberg,et al.  Multiple steady states for chemical reaction networks of deficiency one , 1995 .

[47]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Monotone and near-monotone biochemical networks , 2007, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[48]  David Angeli,et al.  Monotone control systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[49]  Vipul Periwal,et al.  Stoichiometric and Constraint-based Modeling , 2006 .

[50]  J. Liao,et al.  Ensemble modeling of metabolic networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[51]  J. Banga,et al.  Exploring multiplicity conditions in enzymatic reaction networks , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[52]  T. Hughes,et al.  Why Are There Still Over 1000 Uncharacterized Yeast Genes? , 2007, Genetics.

[53]  D. Kirschner,et al.  A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  D. Noble Claude Bernard, the first systems biologist, and the future of physiology , 2008, Experimental physiology.

[55]  Tim Hesterberg,et al.  Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing , 2002, Technometrics.

[56]  S. Kauffman A proposal for using the ensemble approach to understand genetic regulatory networks. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  F. Horn Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics , 1972 .

[58]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[59]  Christiane Lemieux Quasi–Monte Carlo Constructions , 2009 .

[60]  Carmen G. Moles,et al.  Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. , 2003, Genome research.

[61]  Rainer Spang,et al.  Inferring cellular networks – a review , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[62]  Michael A Savageau,et al.  Phenotypes and tolerances in the design space of biochemical systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , 2007 .

[64]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.