Organizational Factors and the Performance of Knowledge Transfer in Construction Industry

The importance of managing knowledge in organizations for competitive advantage has received an amount of attention in recently years. Relatively little study has been performed on tacit knowledge transfer in the construction industry. This paper aims to investigate the relationship between organizational factors and the performance of knowledge transfer. Organizational culture, organizational structure, IT technology, and No-IT approaches as four main independent variables were identified and were also tested against knowledge transfer performance. To achieve an in-depth empirical study, two UK consultant firms and one China construction project were chosen for case study. The results reveal that there are significant relationships between some of the variables and the performance of knowledge transfer. Therefore, it is necessary for construction organizations to consider these factors in implementing knowledge management strategies within/across organization

[1]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[2]  M. Millie Kwan,et al.  The Knowledge Transfer Process: From Field Studies to Technology Development , 2006, J. Database Manag..

[3]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[4]  M. Polanyi,et al.  II.—KNOWING AND BEING , 1961 .

[5]  B. Rubenstein-Montano,et al.  A systems thinking framework for knowledge management , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Knowledge Management Strategies That Create Value , 2001 .

[7]  D. Teece Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context , 2000 .

[8]  Fytton Rowland,et al.  Knowledge management in a public organization: a study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[10]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[12]  Mark S. Demarest Understanding knowledge management , 1997 .

[13]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[16]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Knowing and being : essays , 1969 .

[17]  Dan Holtshouse Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[18]  Syed Omar Sharifuddin Syed-Ikhsan,et al.  Benchmarking knowledge management in a public organisation in Malaysia , 2004 .

[19]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[20]  S. Newell,et al.  Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments , 2003 .

[21]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[22]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .