Primed Vesicles Can Be Distinguished from Docked Vesicles by Analyzing Their Mobility

Neurotransmitters are released from nerve terminals and neuroendocrine cells by calcium-dependent exocytosis of vesicles. Before fusion, vesicles are docked to the plasma membrane and rendered release competent through a process called priming. Electrophysiological methods such as membrane capacitance measurements and carbon fiber amperometry accurately measure the fusion step of exocytosis with high time resolution but provide only indirect information about priming and docking. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) enables the real-time visualization of vesicles, near the plasma membrane, as they undergo changes from one molecular state to the other. We devised a new method to analyze the mobility of vesicles, which not only allowed us to classify the movement of vesicles in three different categories but also to monitor dynamic changes in the mobility of vesicles over time. We selectively enhanced priming by treating bovine chromaffin cells with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) or by overexpressing Munc13-1 (mammalian Unc) and analyzed the mobility of large dense-core vesicles. We demonstrate that nearly immobile vesicles represent primed vesicles because the pool of vesicles displaying this type of mobility was significantly increased after PMA treatment and Munc13-1 overexpression and decreased during tetanus toxin expression. Moreover, we showed that the movement of docked but unprimed vesicles is restricted to a confined region of ∼220 nm diameter. Finally, a small third population of undocked vesicles showed a directed and probably active type of mobility. For the first time, we can thus distinguish the molecular state of vesicles in TIRFM by their mobility.

[1]  G. Rutter,et al.  Myosin Va Transports Dense Core Secretory Vesicles in Pancreatic MIN6 β-Cells , 2005 .

[2]  Colin Rickman,et al.  Conserved prefusion protein assembly in regulated exocytosis. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  D. Bruns,et al.  Molecular determinants of exocytosis , 2001, Pflügers Archiv.

[4]  E. Neher,et al.  Emerging Roles of Presynaptic Proteins in Ca++-Triggered Exocytosis , 2002, Science.

[5]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Neuronal Peptide Release Is Limited by Secretory Granule Mobility , 1997, Neuron.

[6]  Miriam W. Allersma,et al.  Motion matters: secretory granule motion adjacent to the plasma membrane and exocytosis. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Shift anticipated in DNA microarray market , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  G. Rutter,et al.  Myosin Va transports dense core secretory vesicles in pancreatic MIN6 beta-cells. , 2005, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  Martin Oheim,et al.  Multiple stimulation-dependent processes regulate the size of the releasable pool of vesicles , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[10]  W. Stühmer,et al.  Tracking chromaffin granules on their way through the actin cortex , 2000, European Biophysics Journal.

[11]  Xinghua Lu,et al.  Unexpected mobility variation among individual secretory vesicles produces an apparent refractory neuropeptide pool. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[12]  A. Villarroel,et al.  New Roles of Myosin II during Vesicle Transport and Fusion in Chromaffin Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  D. Zenisek,et al.  Transport, capture and exocytosis of single synaptic vesicles at active zones , 2000, Nature.

[14]  E. Neher,et al.  Munc13‐1 acts as a priming factor for large dense‐core vesicles in bovine chromaffin cells , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[15]  E. Neher,et al.  Protein Kinase C Enhances Exocytosis from Chromaffin Cells by Increasing the Size of the Readily Releasable Pool of Secretory Granules , 1996, Neuron.

[16]  H. Qian,et al.  Single particle tracking. Analysis of diffusion and flow in two-dimensional systems. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[17]  M. Verhage,et al.  Dissecting docking and tethering of secretory vesicles at the target membrane , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[18]  Michael J. Saxton,et al.  SINGLE-PARTICLE TRACKING , 2009 .

[19]  U. Ashery,et al.  An efficient method for infection of adrenal chromaffin cells using the Semliki Forest virus gene expression system. , 1999, European journal of cell biology.

[20]  T. Voets.  Dissection of Three Ca2+-Dependent Steps Leading to Secretion in Chromaffin Cells from Mouse Adrenal Slices , 2000, Neuron.

[21]  D. Axelrod,et al.  Neuropeptide release by efficient recruitment of diffusing cytoplasmic secretory vesicles. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  T. Südhof,et al.  v‐SNAREs control exocytosis of vesicles from priming to fusion , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[23]  Daniel Axelrod,et al.  Restriction of Secretory Granule Motion near the Plasma Membrane of Chromaffin Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  E. Neher,et al.  Cytosolic Ca2+ Acts by Two Separate Pathways to Modulate the Supply of Release-Competent Vesicles in Chromaffin Cells , 1998, Neuron.

[25]  U. Becherer,et al.  Vesicle pools, docking, priming, and release , 2006, Cell and Tissue Research.

[26]  R. Chow,et al.  Functional and spatial segregation of secretory vesicle pools according to vesicle age , 2003, Nature.

[27]  J. Henry,et al.  Analysis of transient behavior in complex trajectories: application to secretory vesicle dynamics. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[28]  W. Almers,et al.  Tracking single secretory granules in live chromaffin cells by evanescent-field fluorescence microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.