Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals

BackgroundThe increasing number of individuals living with cancer has led to a focus on the quality of life of survivors, and their families. Sexual wellbeing is a central component of quality of life, with a growing body of research demonstrating the association between cancer and changes to sexuality and intimacy. However, little is known about patient and professional understanding of cancer and sexuality post-cancer. This study was designed to explore the complex perspectives that people with personal and professional experience with cancer hold about sexuality in the context of cancer.MethodsAn interview study using Q methodology was conducted with 44 people with cancer, 35 partners of a person with cancer and 37 health professionals working in oncology. Participants were asked to rank-order 56 statements about sexuality and intimacy after cancer and asked to comment on their rankings in a subsequent semi-structured interview. A by-person factor analysis was performed with factors extracted according to the centroid method with a varimax rotation.ResultsA three-factor solution provided the best conceptual fit for the perspectives regarding intimacy and sexuality post-cancer. Factor 1, entitled “communication – dispelling myths about sex and intimacy” positions communication as central to the acceptance of a range of satisfying sexual and intimate practices post-cancer. Factor 2, “valuing sexuality across the cancer journey,” centres on the theme of normalizing the experience of sex after cancer through the renegotiation of sex and intimacy: the development of alternative sexual practices. Factor 3, “intimacy beyond sex,” presents the view that even though sex may not be wanted, desired, or even possible following cancer, quality of life and relationship satisfaction are achieved through communication and non-genital intimacy.ConclusionsThis study has demonstrated the complexity of perspectives about sexuality and intimacy post cancer, which has practical implications for those working in cancer care and survivorship. Therapists and other health professionals can play an important role in ameliorating concerns surrounding sexual wellbeing after cancer, by opening and facilitating discussion of sexuality and intimacy amongst couples affected by cancer, as well as providing information that normalizes a range of sexual and intimate practices.

[1]  C. Cooper,et al.  Cancer and the family , 1995 .

[2]  R. Cross Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. , 2004, Health education research.

[3]  A. Street,et al.  Constructions of sexuality and intimacy after cancer: patient and health professional perspectives. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[4]  J. Costello,et al.  Assessing the impact of late treatment effects in cervical cancer: an exploratory study of women's sexuality. , 2007, European journal of cancer care.

[5]  M. Hornbrook,et al.  Figuring Out Sex in a Reconfigured Body: Experiences of Female Colorectal Cancer Survivors with Ostomies , 2010, Women & health.

[6]  L. Carlson,et al.  Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: What we know and what we still need to learn. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[7]  Fatemeh Shayan,et al.  Doing Q-methodological research: theory, method and interpretation , 2014, QMiP Bulletin.

[8]  M. Dehghan,et al.  Parents' perceptions and attitudes on childhood obesity: A Q‐methodology study , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[9]  J. Ussher,et al.  Sexuality after gynaecological cancer: a review of the material, intrapsychic, and discursive aspects of treatment on women's sexual-wellbeing. , 2011, Maturitas.

[10]  N. Gavey,et al.  The downside of Viagra: women's experiences and concerns. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[11]  A. Seritan,et al.  Assessment of patient and caregiver needs in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome by utilizing Q-sort methodology , 2010, Aging & mental health.

[12]  H. V. D. van de Wiel,et al.  Psychosexual functioning after treatment for cancer of the cervix: a comparative and longitudinal study , 1990, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[13]  R. Fink,et al.  Couples surviving prostate cancer: challenges in their lives and relationships. , 2011, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[14]  A. Street,et al.  Communicating about patient sexuality and intimacy after cancer: mismatched expectations and unmet needs , 2007 .

[15]  Ying Zhang,et al.  The longitudinal effects of cancer treatment on sexuality in individuals with lung cancer. , 2008, Oncology nursing forum.

[16]  J. Ussher,et al.  Renegotiating Sex and Intimacy After Cancer: Resisting the Coital Imperative , 2013, Cancer nursing.

[17]  M. Jackson Sex research and the construction of sexuality: A tool of male supremacy? , 1984 .

[18]  R. Gray,et al.  Sexual Dysfunction and the Preservation of Manhood: Experiences of Men with Prostate Cancer , 2002, Journal of health psychology.

[19]  M. Gurevich,et al.  (Dis)embodying gender and sexuality in testicular cancer. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Leila Mohammadi,et al.  BMC Cancer , 2001 .

[21]  Annie Potts “The Essence of the Hard On” , 2000 .

[22]  T. Sheldon,et al.  The sexual adaptation of women treated for endometrial cancer. , 1994, Cancer Practice.

[23]  Steven R. Brown,et al.  Using Q‐methodology to understand perceived fatigue reported by adolescents with cancer , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[24]  L. Lazard,et al.  Methodological Pluralism in Theory and in Practice: The Case for Q in the Community , 2011 .

[25]  L. Incrocci Talking about sex to oncologists and cancer to sexologists. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[26]  A. Hyde The politics of heterosexuality--a missing discourse in cancer nursing literature on sexuality: a discussion paper. , 2007, International journal of nursing studies.

[27]  B. Candy,et al.  Interventions for sexual dysfunction following treatments for cancer. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  C. Hicks,et al.  A Q methodology study of women's experience of enduring postnatal perineal and pelvic floor morbidity. , 2007, Midwifery.

[29]  S. Mercadante,et al.  Sexual issues in early and late stage cancer: a review , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[30]  C. Dancey,et al.  The understanding of their illness amongst people with irritable bowel syndrome: a Q methodological study. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[31]  D. Machin,et al.  Life after radiotherapy: the psychological and social effects experienced by women treated for advanced stages of cervical cancer. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[32]  M. Groenvold,et al.  Early‐stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function , 2004, Cancer.

[33]  Julie A. Winterich,et al.  Sex, Menopause, and Culture , 2003 .

[34]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Social analysis : selected tools and techniques , 2001 .

[35]  P. Koch,et al.  Midlife women's attributions for their sexual response changes. , 2000, Health care for women international.

[36]  J. Ussher,et al.  Information needs associated with changes to sexual well-being after breast cancer. , 2013, Journal of advanced nursing.

[37]  Randel D. Brown,et al.  Beliefs of professional and family caregivers about the sexuality of individuals with intellectual disabilities: examining beliefs using a Q‐methodology approach , 2008 .

[38]  G. Velikova,et al.  Interventions for sexual problems following treatment for breast cancer: a systematic review , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[39]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[40]  J. Ussher,et al.  Changes to Sexual Well-Being and Intimacy After Breast Cancer , 2012, Cancer nursing.

[41]  K. Dennis,et al.  Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research , 1986, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[42]  J. Ussher,et al.  Renegotiating Sexuality and Intimacy in the Context of Cancer: The Experiences of Carers , 2010, Archives of sexual behavior.

[43]  Fiona Dziopa,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of the Applications of Q-Technique and Its Methodology , 2011 .

[44]  M. Galbraith,et al.  Alterations of sexual function in men with cancer. , 2008, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[45]  J. Ussher,et al.  Accounts of disruptions to sexuality following cancer: the perspective of informal carers who are partners of a person with cancer , 2009, Health.

[46]  Raymond J. Corsini,et al.  Handbook of innovative psychotherapies , 1981 .

[47]  A. Hordern Intimacy and Sexuality After Cancer: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2008, Cancer nursing.

[48]  E. Klein,et al.  Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: A phone survey of men's and women's perspectives , 2003, Psycho-oncology.

[49]  B. Bokhour,et al.  Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer: exploring the meanings of "erectile dysfunction". , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[50]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[51]  J. Ussher,et al.  Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. , 2010, Maturitas.

[52]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Rethinking Methods in Psychology , 1995 .

[53]  J. Ussher,et al.  Talking about sex after cancer: A discourse analytic study of health care professional accounts of sexual communication with patients , 2013, Psychology & health.

[54]  V. Braun,et al.  Interruptus Coitus: Heterosexuals Accounting for Intercourse , 1999 .

[55]  M. Arrington “I don’t want to be an artificial man”: Narrative reconstruction of sexuality among prostate cancer survivors , 2003 .

[56]  B. Thomé,et al.  Women’s Wishes and Need for Knowledge Concerning Sexuality and Relationships in Connection with Gynecological Cancer Disease , 2008 .

[57]  K. White,et al.  Psychosocial impact in the areas of body image and sexuality for women with breast cancer , 2004 .

[58]  L. Cordingley,et al.  Q methodology. , 1997, Nurse Researcher.

[59]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[60]  P. Butow,et al.  Post‐treatment sexual adjustment following cervical and endometrial cancer: a qualitative insight , 2003, Psycho-oncology.

[61]  Steven R. Brown Q Methodology and Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[62]  M. Jankowska Sexual functioning of testicular cancer survivors and their partners - A review of literature. , 2011, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[63]  Paul Stenner,et al.  Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method & Interpretation , 2012 .

[64]  J. Ussher,et al.  Changes in Sexuality and Intimacy After the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: The Experience of Partners in a Sexual Relationship With a Person With Cancer , 2009, Cancer nursing.

[65]  J. Oliffe Constructions of masculinity following prostatectomy-induced impotence. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[66]  D. F. Hurlbert,et al.  Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: an examination of women in nondistressed marriages. , 1993, Journal of sex & marital therapy.

[67]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Defining (Hetero)Sex , 2001 .

[68]  S. Hampson,et al.  Enhancing Women's Partnership with Health Providers in Hormone Replacement Therapy Decision-Making:: Research and Practice Directions , 1993 .

[69]  J. Ussher,et al.  changes In Sexuality And Intimacy Following The Diagnosis And Treatment Of Cancer: The Experience Of Partners In A Sexual Relationship With A Person With Cancer : 192 , 2009 .

[70]  M. Hughes Alterations of sexual function in women with cancer. , 2008, Seminars in oncology nursing.

[71]  C. Berterö Altered sexual patterns after treatment for prostate cancer. , 2001, Cancer practice.

[72]  David Shemmings,et al.  ‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: an illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research , 2006 .