The impact of temperature and urinary constituents on urine viscosity and its relevance to bladder hyperthermia treatment

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the kinematic viscosity of human urine and factors associated with its variability. This value is necessary for accurate modelling of fluid mechanics and heat transfer during hyperthermia treatments of bladder cancer. Materials and methods: Urine samples from 64 patients undergoing routine clinical testing were subject to dipstick urinalysis and measurement of viscosity with a Cannon-Fenske viscometer. Viscosity measurements were taken at relevant temperatures for hyperthermia studies: 20 °C (room temperature), 37 °C (body temperature), and 42 °C (clinical hyperthermia temperature). Factors that might affect viscosity were assessed, including glucosuria, haematuria, urinary tract infection status, ketonuria and proteinuria status. The correlation of urine specific gravity and viscosity was measured with Spearman’s rho. Results: Urine kinematic viscosity at 20 °C was 1.0700 cSt (standard deviation (SD) = 0.1076), at 37 °C 0.8293 cSt (SD = 0.0851), and at 42 °C 0.6928 cSt (SD = 0.0247). Proteinuria appeared to increase urine viscosity, whereas age, gender, urinary tract infection, glucosuria, ketonuria, and haematuria did not affect it. Urine specific gravity was only modestly correlated with urine viscosity at 20 °C (rho = 0.259), 37 °C (rho = 0.266), and 42 °C (rho = 0.255). Conclusions: The kinematic viscosity of human urine is temperature dependent and higher than water. Urine specific gravity was not a good predictor of viscosity. Of factors that might affect urine viscosity, only proteinuria appeared to be clinically relevant. Estimates of urine viscosity provided in this manuscript may be useful for temperature modelling of bladder hyperthermia treatments with regard to correct prediction of the thermal conduction effects.

[1]  R. Issels,et al.  Hyperthermia in oncology. , 2001, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[2]  Uttam Garg,et al.  Measurement of urinary concentration: a critical appraisal of methodologies , 2001, Pediatric Nephrology.

[3]  F. Greene AJCC cancer staging handbook , 2002 .

[4]  D. Neal,et al.  Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[5]  M. Chang,et al.  Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  J. Witjes,et al.  Combined local bladder hyperthermia and intravesical chemotherapy for the treatment of high-grade superficial bladder cancer. , 2004, Urology.

[7]  Bernard L. Oser,et al.  Hawk's Physiological Chemistry , 2015 .

[8]  M. Stone,et al.  Evidence-based focused review Evidence-based focused review of management of hyperviscosity syndrome , 2012 .

[9]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[10]  Abram S. Dorfman,et al.  Conjugate Problems in Convective Heat Transfer , 2009 .

[11]  Kavitha Arunachalam,et al.  Utility of treatment planning for thermochemotherapy treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder carcinoma. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Y Cinar,et al.  Blood viscosity and blood pressure: role of temperature and hyperglycemia. , 2001, American journal of hypertension.

[13]  Lex M Bouter,et al.  The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy , 2004, BMC urology.

[14]  Bert Flemming,et al.  Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[15]  Abram Dorfman,et al.  Conjugate Problems in Convective Heat Transfer: Review , 2009 .

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  R. Dinegar,et al.  THE VISCOSITY OF URINE , 1918 .

[18]  K. T. Mathew,et al.  Dielectric properties of human urine at microwave frequencies , 2004 .

[19]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Miniature microwave applicator for murine bladder hyperthermia studies , 2012, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[20]  Gerhard Gompper,et al.  Predicting human blood viscosity in silico , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A. D. B. Roessingh,et al.  Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable , 2001, Archives of disease in childhood.

[22]  Robert J. Roselli,et al.  Biotransport: Principles and Applications , 2011 .

[23]  J. Kestin,et al.  Viscosity of Liquid Water in the Range - 8 C to 150 C, , 1978 .

[24]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[25]  J Kienlen,et al.  Pharmacocinétique et modifications des propriétés physiques du sang et des urines après administration d'un dextran 60 000 , 1990 .

[26]  S. A. Regirer,et al.  Mathematical models in urinary system mechanics (review) , 2005 .

[27]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[29]  Simon N. Wood,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 2006, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[30]  Jonathan C Craig,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipsticks for detection of albuminuria in the general community. , 2011, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[31]  C. Borror Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd, Ed. , 2001 .

[32]  P. Persson,et al.  Up to 50-fold increase in urine viscosity with iso-osmolar contrast media in the rat. , 2010, Radiology.