Structure, Properties, and In Vitro Behavior of Heat-Treated Calcium Sulfate Scaffolds Fabricated by 3D Printing

The ability of inkjet-based 3D printing (3DP) to fabricate biocompatible ceramics has made it one of the most favorable techniques to generate bone tissue engineering (BTE) scaffolds. Calcium sulfates exhibit various beneficial characteristics, and they can be used as a promising biomaterial in BTE. However, low mechanical performance caused by the brittle character of ceramic materials is the main weakness of 3DP calcium sulfate scaffolds. Moreover, the presence of certain organic matters in the starting powder and binder solution causes products to have high toxicity levels. A post-processing treatment is usually employed to improve the physical, chemical, and biological behaviors of the printed scaffolds. In this study, the effects of heat treatment on the structural, mechanical, and physical characteristics of 3DP calcium sulfate prototypes were investigated. Different microscopy and spectroscopy methods were employed to characterize the printed prototypes. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the specimens was also evaluated before and after heat treatment. Results showed that the as-printed scaffolds and specimens heat treated at 300°C exhibited severe toxicity in vitro but had almost adequate strength. By contrast, the specimens heat treated in the 500°C–1000°C temperature range, although non-toxic, had insufficient mechanical strength, which was mainly attributed to the exit of the organic binder before 500°C and the absence of sufficient densification below 1000°C. The sintering process was accelerated at temperatures higher than 1000°C, resulting in higher compressive strength and less cytotoxicity. An anhydrous form of calcium sulfate was the only crystalline phase existing in the samples heated at 500°C–1150°C. The formation of calcium oxide caused by partial decomposition of calcium sulfate was observed in the specimens heat treated at temperatures higher than 1200°C. Although considerable improvements in cell viability of heat-treated scaffolds were observed in this study, the mechanical properties were not significantly improved, requiring further investigations. However, the findings of this study give a better insight into the complex nature of the problem in the fabrication of synthetic bone grafts and scaffolds via post-fabrication treatment of 3DP calcium sulfate prototypes.

[1]  N. Mattheos,et al.  Current perspectives on the role of ridge (socket) preservation procedures in dental implant treatment in the aesthetic zone. , 2014, Australian dental journal.

[2]  J. Sottosanti Calcium sulfate: a biodegradable and biocompatible barrier for guided tissue regeneration. , 1992, Compendium.

[3]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[4]  Noor Azuan Abu Osman,et al.  Effect of Layer Thickness and Printing Orientation on Mechanical Properties and Dimensional Accuracy of 3D Printed Porous Samples for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Gabriele Grimm,et al.  Development of a new calcium phosphate powder-binder system for the 3D printing of patient specific implants , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[6]  J. Planell,et al.  Electrospun gelatin/poly(ε-caprolactone) fibrous scaffold modified with calcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[7]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[8]  S. Saha Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants , 2010 .

[9]  R. Genco,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline calcium sulfate for use in osseous regeneration , 2011, Biomedical materials.

[10]  Toshiko Mori,et al.  Gypsum-bonded investment and dental precision casting (IV) transformation of III-CaSO4 to II-CaSO4. , 2004, Dental materials journal.

[11]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[12]  Mehran Solati-Hashjin,et al.  Effect of technical parameters on porous structure and strength of 3D printed calcium sulfate prototypes , 2016 .

[13]  E. Saiz,et al.  Porous ceramic scaffolds with complex architectures , 2008 .

[14]  Nicholas Dunne,et al.  Printability of calcium phosphate: calcium sulfate powders for the application of tissue engineered bone scaffolds using the 3D printing technique. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[15]  Peng Li,et al.  Functionalized scaffolds to enhance tissue regeneration , 2015, Regenerative biomaterials.

[16]  T. Kameda,et al.  Calcium-sensing receptor in mature osteoclasts, which are bone resorbing cells. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  Sangeeta N. Bhatia,et al.  3-D Fabrication Technology for Tissue Engineering , 2006 .

[18]  A. Blom V) Which scaffold for which application , 2007 .

[19]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Smart biomaterials design for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[20]  Uwe Gbureck,et al.  3D printing of ceramic implants , 2015 .

[22]  Tomislav Galeta,et al.  Influence of Processing Factors on Tensile Strength of 3D Printed Models , 2013 .

[23]  Frank A. Müller,et al.  Resorbable Dicalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes Prepared by 3D Powder Printing , 2007 .

[24]  Alida Mazzoli,et al.  Selective laser sintering manufacturing of polycaprolactone bone scaffolds for applications in bone tissue engineering , 2015 .

[25]  Chaozong Liu,et al.  Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2007 .

[26]  Valeria Chiono,et al.  An Overview of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)-Based Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[27]  K. Leong,et al.  The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[28]  R. Brand 50 Years Ago in CORR: The Use of Plaster of Paris to Fill Defects in Bone Leonard F. Peltier, MD CORR 1961;21:1–31 , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  Christian Bergmann,et al.  3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses , 2010 .

[30]  Byong-Taek Lee,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of porous PCL-PLLA 3D polymer scaffolds fabricated via salt leaching method for bone tissue engineering applications , 2014, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[31]  Nicholas Dunne,et al.  Effects of Heat Treatment on the Mechanical and Degradation Properties of 3D-Printed Calcium-Sulphate-Based Scaffolds , 2013 .

[32]  David A Puleo,et al.  Calcium sulfate: Properties and clinical applications. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[33]  Benjamin M Wu,et al.  Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials , 2015, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[34]  A. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing , 2013 .

[35]  Warren O. Haggard,et al.  Composite chitosan and calcium sulfate scaffold for dual delivery of vancomycin and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[36]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Fundamentals of biomechanics in tissue engineering of bone. , 2000, Tissue engineering.

[37]  Wan Aizan Wan Abdul Rahman,et al.  Biodegradable Polymers and their Bone Applications : A Review , 2012 .

[38]  Lei Peng,et al.  Engineering scaffolds integrated with calcium sulfate and oyster shell for enhanced bone tissue regeneration. , 2014, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[39]  G. J. Vogel,et al.  Decomposition of calcium sulfate: a review of the literature. , 1976 .

[40]  Joseph William Frascati,et al.  Effects Of Position, Orientation, And Infiltrating Material On Three Dimensional Printing Models , 2007 .

[41]  R. V. Prasad,et al.  Synthesis and sintered properties evaluation of calcium phosphate ceramics , 2007 .

[42]  A. Zamanian,et al.  Fabrication of a novel nanostructured calcium zirconium silicate scaffolds prepared by a freeze-casting method for bone tissue engineering , 2014 .

[43]  Joo L. Ong,et al.  Diffusion in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Design Issues Related to Porosity, Permeability, Architecture, and Nutrient Mixing , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  K. Burg,et al.  Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[45]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[46]  Mark A. Ganter,et al.  A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP) , 2008 .

[47]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffold development using 3D printing with a starch-based polymer , 2002 .

[48]  M Bohner,et al.  Structural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based three-dimensional printing. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[49]  T. Vogl,et al.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament™ SpineSupport) in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[50]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[51]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  The effect of coating type on mechanical properties and controlled drug release of PCL/zein coated 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[52]  L. Peltier,et al.  The Use of Plaster of Paris to Fill Defects in Bone , 1957, Annals of surgery.

[53]  Changsheng Liu,et al.  Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering , 2014 .

[54]  Ruth Jill Urbanic,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Post-Processing Variables on Tensile and Compression Characteristics for 3D Printed Components , 2015 .

[55]  L. Zichner,et al.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate as biodegradable composite carrier material for local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[56]  Ta-Jen Huang,et al.  Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[57]  J. Ramirez-Vick,et al.  Scaffold design for bone regeneration. , 2014, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[58]  U Gbureck,et al.  Hydraulic setting Mg3(PO4)2 powders for 3D printing technology , 2011 .

[59]  G. Intini,et al.  Platelet-derived growth factor enhancement of two alloplastic bone matrices. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[60]  Rui L Reis,et al.  Natural‐Based Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: A Review , 2015, Advanced materials.

[61]  S. Kasugai,et al.  Bone formation with the combination of simvastatin and calcium sulfate in critical-sized rat calvarial defect. , 2007, Journal of pharmacological sciences.

[62]  M Bohner,et al.  Commentary: Deciphering the link between architecture and biological response of a bone graft substitute. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[63]  Tabatabaei Qomi,et al.  The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering , 2014 .

[64]  D. Puleo,et al.  Calcium sulfate: a review. , 2005, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[65]  A. Farzadi,et al.  Effect of layer printing delay on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed porous prototypes in bone tissue engineering , 2015 .

[66]  R. Lakes,et al.  Introduction to Biomaterials , 1992 .

[67]  H. Fischer,et al.  Scaffolds for bone healing: concepts, materials and evidence. , 2011, Injury.

[68]  J. Suwanprateeb,et al.  Low temperature preparation of calcium phosphate structure via phosphorization of 3D-printed calcium sulfate hemihydrate based material , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.