Ion channel current amplitudes (μ) and open probabilities (Po) have been analysed so far by defining a 50% threshold to distinguish between open and closed states of the channels. With this standard method (SM) it is very difficult or even impossible to analyse channels of different size in one membrane patch correctly. A stochastical model, named the hidden Markov model (HMM), separates between observation noise and the stochastic process of opening and closing of ion channels. The HMM allows the independent analysis of μ, Po, and mean dwell times (τ) of different channels in one membrane patch, without defining threshold levels. Using this method errors in the analysis are not summarized like in the SM because all different analysing procedures (e. g. filtering, setting of threshold, fitting processes) are done in one step. Two different K+ channels in excised basolateral membranes of the cortical collecting duct of rat (CCD) were analysed by the SM and the HMM. The μ value of the intermediate-conductance K+ channel (i-K+) was 3.9±0.1 pA (SM) and 3.8±0.2 pA (HMM) for 11 observations. The Po value of this channel was 10.2±4.2% (SM) and 10.1±4.0% (HMM). The mean τ values were 5.4±0.6 ms for the open state and 9.6±2.2 ms and 145±21 ms for the closed states (SM) and 7.8±1.1 ms, 7.7±0.9 ms and 148±24 ms (HMM), respectively. For seven small-conductance K+ (s-K+) channels, which were found in the same membrane patches as the i-K+, an accurate analysis of Po and τ was not possible with the SM. The μ value was 1.0±0.1 (SM), 0.9±0.1 (HMM) pA. Po was 16.6±4.6%, the open τ value was 11.1±2.8 ms, and the closed τ value was 34.9±8.5 ms. The HMM allows the analysis of single-channel currents, Po, and mean τ values when different or more than one ion channel(s) are colocalized in one membrane patch. Where analysis with the SM was possible results did not significantly differ from those obtained with the HMM. Thus for this kind of analysis the method of setting a 50% threshold appears justified.
[1]
L. Baum,et al.
A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains
,
1970
.
[2]
Mariëlle Stoelinga,et al.
An Introduction to Probabilistic Automata
,
2002,
Bull. EATCS.
[3]
G. Radons,et al.
Recognizing and Simulating Neuronal Spike Patterns with Hidden Markov Models
,
1993,
DAGM-Symposium.
[4]
B. Efron.
Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
,
1979
.
[5]
S H Chung,et al.
Characterization of single channel currents using digital signal processing techniques based on Hidden Markov Models.
,
1990,
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[6]
Van Nostrand,et al.
Error Bounds for Convolutional Codes and an Asymptotically Optimum Decoding Algorithm
,
1967
.
[7]
D. Rubin,et al.
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
,
1977
.
[8]
Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
,
1989,
Proc. IEEE.
[9]
E. Schlatter,et al.
K+ channels in the basolateral membrane of rat cortical collecting duct.
,
1995,
Kidney international.
[10]
Fred J. Sigworth,et al.
Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single-Channel Records
,
1983
.
[11]
J. Rice,et al.
Maximum likelihood estimation and identification directly from single-channel recordings
,
1992,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.