Coherence-Based Underwater Target Detection From Multiple Disparate Sonar Platforms

This paper explores the use of multichannel coherence as a tool for detection of underwater targets from imagery captured from multiple disparate sonar systems. The use of multiple disparate sonars allows one to exploit a high-resolution sonar with good target definition while taking advantage of the clutter suppression abilities of a low-resolution broadband (BB) sonar coregistered over the same region to provide much better detection performance comparing to those of the single-sonar cases. In this paper, the standard Neyman-Pearson detector is extended to the dual disparate sonar case allowing target detection across two sensory channels simultaneously. A novel distributed detection system is also developed that exploits the use of multiple dual-sonar detectors for multiplatform target detection. Test results of the proposed detection methods are also presented on an underwater synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery database containing data from three different imaging sonars operating at three different frequencies and resolutions. Test results illustrating the effectiveness of different coherent-based detection systems will be presented and benchmarked against those of two other detection methods in terms of probability of detection, false alarm rate, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Performance gains of about 23% in probability of detection were achieved over the benchmarked methods.

[1]  Enrique Coiras,et al.  Automatic Target Recognition in Synthetic Aperture Sonar Images Based on Geometrical Feature Extraction , 2009, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[2]  S. C. Butler,et al.  Triply resonant broadband transducers , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[3]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[4]  Tom Aridgides,et al.  Enhanced ATR algorithm for high resolution multi-band sonar imagery , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[5]  Gerald J. Dobeck,et al.  Automated detection and classification of sea mines in sonar imagery , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Buried Underwater Object Classification Using a Collaborative Multi-Aspect Classifier , 2007, 2007 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[7]  Tom Aridgides,et al.  Automated target classification in high resolution dual frequency sonar imagery , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[9]  R. Stolt MIGRATION BY FOURIER TRANSFORM , 1978 .

[10]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers , 2007 .

[11]  John K. Thomas,et al.  Canonical Coordinates are the Right Coordinates for Low-Rank Gauss–Gauss Detection and Estimation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[13]  N.A. Rimski-Korsakov,et al.  Simple digital system for side scan sonar data imaging , 1994, Proceedings of OCEANS'94.

[14]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[15]  Richard Bamler,et al.  A comparison of range-Doppler and wavenumber domain SAR focusing algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  S. C. Butler High frequency triply resonant broadband transducer array development at NUWC , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[17]  Gerald J. Dobeck,et al.  Adaptive-filter/feature-orthogonalization processing string for optimal LLRT mine classfication in side-scan sonar imagery , 1996, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[18]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[19]  M.R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Buried underwater target classification using frequency subband coherence analysis , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[20]  W. Carrara,et al.  Spotlight synthetic aperture radar : signal processing algorithms , 1995 .

[21]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Low rank detectors for Gaussian random vectors , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[22]  Gerald J. Dobeck Fusing sonar images for mine detection and classification , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[23]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Canonical coordinates and the geometry of inference, rate, and capacity , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  M.R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Canonical Coordinates for Detection and Classification of Underwater Objects From Sonar Imagery , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[25]  M.R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Undersea Target Classification Using Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[26]  Vinod Chandran,et al.  Detection of mines in acoustic images using higher order spectral features , 2002 .

[27]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjdadi,et al.  Target detection from dual disparate sonar platforms using canonical correlations , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[28]  W. H. Key,et al.  Side scan sonar technology , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[29]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 2005 .