Testing Negative: The Non-Consequences of COVID-19 on Mass Ideology

Responding to COVID-19, governments implemented large-scale economic and social policies of unprecedented scale. This highlighted the state's capacity to guarantee economic and health security, and affected demographic groups that are less commonly beneficiaries of state support. We hypothesise that exposure to the pandemic and these policy responses caused change in attitudes to the role of government in the economy and redistribution. We test this expectation using data from the (2014–present) British Election Study panel, together with a unique panel survey fielded to existing BES respondents in April and September, 2020. We find virtually no evidence of any effect on ideological beliefs. Moreover, using a survey experiment, we find exposure to cues linking the pandemic to greater roles for government has no impact on ideological beliefs. We conclude that such elite rhetoric, even if it had been present in the field, would not have yielded ideological change.

[1]  Silja Häusermann,et al.  Attitudinal polarization towards the redistributive role of the state in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis , 2021, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.

[2]  SCOTT CLIFFORD,et al.  Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects: Repeated Measures Designs in Survey Experiments , 2021, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Peter Egge Langsæther,et al.  Explaining the Relationship Between Class Position and Political Preferences: A Long-Term Panel Analysis of Intra-Generational Class Mobility , 2021, British Journal of Political Science.

[4]  L. Halman,et al.  Stability or change of public opinion and values during the coronavirus crisis? Exploring Dutch longitudinal panel data , 2020, European Societies.

[5]  P. Esaiasson,et al.  How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment’ , 2020, European Journal of Political Research.

[6]  Ben Merriman Good Enough for Government Work: The Public Reputation Crisis in America (and What We Can Do to Fix It) , 2020 .

[7]  Martin Baekgaard,et al.  Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions , 2020, Journal of Behavioral Public Administration.

[8]  A. Blais,et al.  The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy? , 2020, European Journal of Political Research.

[9]  Raluca L. Pahontu Divisive jobs: three facets of risk, precarity, and redistribution , 2020, Political Science Research and Methods.

[10]  Nadja Wehl Going beyond values versus self-interest: whose attitudes change after employment transitions? , 2020 .

[11]  Macarena Ares Changing classes, changing preferences: how social class mobility affects economic preferences , 2019, West European Politics.

[12]  Yotam Margalit Political Responses to Economic Shocks , 2019, Annual Review of Political Science.

[13]  L. Martén Demand for Redistribution: Individuals’ Responses to Economic Setbacks , 2018, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics.

[14]  L. Jacobs,et al.  When and How New Policy Creates New Politics: Examining the Feedback Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Public Opinion , 2018, Perspectives on Politics.

[15]  D. Hopkins,et al.  The Medicaid Expansion and Attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act: Testing for a Policy Feedback on Mass Opinion , 2018, Public Opinion Quarterly.

[16]  James Tilley,et al.  When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice , 2018, The Journal of Politics.

[17]  Tom O’Grady How do Economic Circumstances Determine Preferences? Evidence from Long-run Panel Data , 2017 .

[18]  J. Stonecash Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government , 2017 .

[19]  Amy E. Lerman,et al.  Personal Experience and Public Opinion: A Theory and Test of Conditional Policy Feedback , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  E. Snowberg,et al.  Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey , 2016, American Political Science Review.

[21]  David M. Woodruff Governing by Panic , 2016 .

[22]  E. Naumann,et al.  How Unemployment Experience Affects Support for the Welfare State: A Real Panel Approach , 2016 .

[23]  Patrick. Leblond,et al.  All in: Market expectations of eurozone integrity in the sovereign debt crisis , 2015 .

[24]  Kris-Stella Trump,et al.  The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences , 2014, The Journal of Politics.

[25]  Lindsay A. Owens,et al.  Material Welfare and Changing Political Preferences: The Case of Support for Redistributive Social Policies , 2014 .

[26]  Samuel Brazys,et al.  From ‘Tiger’ to ‘PIIGS’: Ireland and the use of heuristics in comparative political economy , 2013 .

[27]  Jeff Manza,et al.  A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession , 2013 .

[28]  Daniel Stegmueller,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Preferences: A Bayesian Robust Dynamic Latent Ordered Probit Model , 2013, Political Analysis.

[29]  Joseph G. Peschek The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy , 2013 .

[30]  Yotam Margalit Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession , 2013, American Political Science Review.

[31]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State , 2012, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Kimberly J Morgan,et al.  The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy , 2011 .

[33]  Noam Lupu The Structure of Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution , 2011, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Philipp Rehm Social Policy by Popular Demand , 2011 .

[35]  D. Stasavage,et al.  The Conscription of Wealth: Mass Warfare and the Demand for Progressive Taxation , 2010, International Organization.

[36]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  Thomas R. Cusack,et al.  Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution , 2006 .

[38]  G. Weary,et al.  Roles of the Availability of Explanations, Feelings of Ease, and Dysphoria In Judgments about the Future , 2002 .

[39]  Christina Fong,et al.  Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution , 2001 .

[40]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State? , 2001 .

[41]  Dennis Chong,et al.  When Self-Interest Matters , 2001 .

[42]  Joshua Miller Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy , 2000 .

[43]  Joe Soss,et al.  Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[44]  K. Okma Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment , 1998 .

[45]  Diederik A. Stapel,et al.  Social identity, availability and the perception of risk , 1994 .

[46]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Protecting soldiers and mothers : the political origins of social policy in the United States , 1993 .

[47]  Richard A. Brody,et al.  Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology , 1991 .

[48]  D. Kinder,et al.  Sociotropic Politics: The American Case , 1981, British Journal of Political Science.

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[50]  D. Green,et al.  Are There Long-Term Effects of the Vietnam Draft on Political Attitudes or Behavior? Apparently Not , 2018, Journal of Experimental Political Science.

[51]  M. Petersen Social welfare as small-scale help: evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. , 2012, American journal of political science.

[52]  M. Petersen,et al.  Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic , 2011 .

[53]  Kevin W. Hamlen,et al.  Computability classes for enforcement mechanisms , 2006, TOPL.

[54]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[55]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[56]  R. Arnold The logic of congressional action , 1990 .