Optimization of transit bus fleet's life cycle assessment impacts with alternative fuel options

Public transportation is one of the most promising transportation modes to reduce the environmental emissions of the transportation sector in the U.S. In order to mitigate the environmental impacts brought by the transit bus system, new energy buses are introduced into the vehicle market. The goal of this study is to find an optimal bus fleet combination for different driving conditions to minimize life cycle cost, greenhouse gas emissions, and conventional air pollutant emission impacts. For this purpose, a Multi-Objective Linear Programming approach is used to select the optimum bus fleet combinations. Given different weight scenarios, this method could effectively provide solutions for decision makers with various budget constraints or emission reduction requirements. The results indicate that in heavily congested driving cycles such as the Manhattan area, the battery electric bus is the dominant vehicle type, while the hybrid bus has more balanced performances in most scenarios because of its lower initial investment comparing to battery electric buses. Petroleum powered buses have seldom been selected by the model. The trade-off analysis shows that the overall greenhouse gas impact performance is sensitive to the life cycle cost after certain points, which could provide valuable information for the bus fleet combination planning.

[1]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[2]  H Christopher Frey,et al.  Method for in-use measurement and evaluation of the activity, fuel use, electricity use, and emissions of a plug-in hybrid diesel-electric school bus. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Omer Tatari,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment of public transportation buses with alternative fuel options , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Electric vehicle cost, emissions, and water footprint in the United States: Development of a regional optimization model , 2015 .

[5]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Can Euro V heavy-duty diesel engines, diesel hybrid and alternative fuel technologies mitigate NOX emissions? New evidence from on-road tests of buses in China , 2014 .

[6]  Mansour Rahimi,et al.  JOINTLY OPTIMIZING COST, SERVICE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN DEMAND-RESPONSIVE TRANSIT SCHEDULING , 2003 .

[7]  Antti Lajunen,et al.  Energy consumption and cost-benefit analysis of hybrid and electric city buses , 2014 .

[8]  Xiaosong Hu,et al.  Energy efficiency analysis of a series plug-in hybrid electric bus with different energy management strategies and battery sizes , 2013 .

[9]  S. Joshi.  Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques , 1999 .

[10]  Omer Tatari,et al.  A stochastic optimization approach for the selection of reflective cracking mitigation techniques , 2014 .

[11]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Kevin Chandler,et al.  Assessment of Hybrid-Electric Transit Bus Technology , 2009 .

[14]  M. Auffhammer.  Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use , 2011, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[15]  Michael Kay,et al.  Bus Lifecycle Cost Model for Federal Land Management Agencies. , 2011 .

[16]  Julio Lumbreras Martin,et al.  Comparison of Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of natural gas, biodiesel and diesel buses of the Madrid transportation system , 2012 .

[17]  Harry C. Watson,et al.  Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles , 2002 .

[18]  Wenwei Ke,et al.  Can propulsion and fuel diversity for the bus fleet achieve the win–win strategy of energy conservation and environmental protection? , 2015 .

[19]  Guohe Huang,et al.  An inexact optimization modeling approach for supporting energy systems planning and air pollution mitigation in Beijing city , 2012 .

[20]  R. Barnitt.  Case Study: Ebus Hybrid Electric Buses and Trolleys , 2006 .

[21]  Nicholas Z. Muller,et al.  Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States , 2007 .

[22]  J. Neff,et al.  2016 Public Transportation Fact Book , 2008 .

[23]  Horst A. Eiselt,et al.  Operations Research: A Model-Based Approach , 2010 .

[24]  Liping Fu,et al.  Fleet Size and Mix Optimization for Paratransit Services , 2004 .

[25]  Feng Zhen,et al.  Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost and Year 2007 Emissions Estimation , 2007 .

[26]  Cliff T. Ragsdale,et al.  Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Management Science , 2003 .

[27]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Diesel and Electric Public Transportation Buses , 2013 .

[29]  John J Schiavone,et al.  Creation of Life-Cycle Cost Tool for Transit Buses to Evaluate Hybrid Electric Bus Technologies in Real-World Operation , 2011 .

[30]  Haibo Zhai,et al.  Comparing real-world fuel consumption for diesel- and hydrogen-fueled transit buses and implication for emissions , 2007 .

[31]  Julia B. Griswold,et al.  Tradeoffs between costs and greenhouse gas emissions in the design of urban transit systems , 2013 .

[32]  M. Gambino,et al.  Evaluation of emission toxicity of urban bus engines: compressed natural gas and comparison with liquid fuels. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  R. Barnitt.  BAE/Orion Hybrid Electric Buses at New York City Transit: A Generational Comparison (Revised) , 2008 .

[35]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  Minimizing the health and climate impacts of emissions from heavy-duty public transportation bus fleets through operational optimization. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  C. Johnson.  Business Case for Compressed Natural Gas in Municipal Fleets , 2010 .

[38]  Wassily Leontief.  Input-Output Economics , 1966 .

[39]  Fabio Polonara,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe , 2010 .

[40]  Reinhart Kühne,et al.  Electric buses An energy efficient urban transportation means , 2010 .

[41]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  The Broader Connection Between Public Transportation, Energy Conservation and Greenhouse Gas Reduction , 2008 .

[42]  Wayne L. Winston.  Practical Management Science , 1997 .

[43]  D. Hess.  What is a clean bus? Object conflicts in the greening of urban transit , 2007 .

[44]  Vincenzo Marano,et al.  Simulation of an electric transportation system at The Ohio State University , 2014 .

[45]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[46]  Tao Li,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of an Engine with Input-Output Based Hybrid Analysis Method , 2014 .