Numerical analysis of aerodynamic characteristics of multi-pod hyperloop system

The Hyperloop system is a new and innovative mode of transportation in which high-speed pods move through near-vacuum tubes. The multi-pod Hyperloop Systems are essential for increased transportation capacity. In this study, a multi-pod Hyperloop System was analyzed using numerical simulations at different values of the distance between the pods (i.e., 2 L–3.5 L). The pressure and velocity flow fields and the aerodynamic characteristics of the pods were analyzed for four different flow speeds, that is, 100, 200, 300, and 400 m/s, using unsteady compressible flow conditions. The simulation results indicated that the pressure waves generated across the pods play a significant role in the determination of the aerodynamic characteristics of the pods. Increasing the distance between the pods results in the delay of the pressure wave interaction. The aerodynamic drag increases on the first pod with the increase in the distance between the pods due to an increase in the pressure gradient. In contrast, the aerodynamic drag decreases across the second pod with the increase in the distance between them. So, the distance between the pods is a critical factor that should be considered when designing the Hyperloop System with more than one pod.

[1]  Mohamed Aly Sayed,et al.  Aerodynamic study of a Hyperloop pod equipped with compressor to overcome the Kantrowitz limit , 2021, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[2]  Jaiyoung Ryu,et al.  Effects of compressible flow phenomena on aerodynamic characteristics in Hyperloop system , 2021 .

[3]  Junqiang Zhu,et al.  Numerical investigation on the aerodynamic performance and flow mechanism of a fan with a partial-height booster rotor , 2021 .

[4]  Jaiyoung Ryu,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Drag and Pressure Waves in Hyperloop Systems , 2020, Mathematics.

[5]  Yu Yanping,et al.  Effect of acceleration and deceleration of a capsule train running at transonic speed on the flow and heat transfer in the tube , 2020 .

[6]  Jinglei Xu,et al.  Optimization and analysis of inverse design method of maximum thrust scramjet nozzles , 2020 .

[7]  A. Hadjadj,et al.  Analysis of shock-wave unsteadiness in conical supersonic nozzles , 2020 .

[8]  Z. Deng,et al.  Numerical study on the influence of initial ambient temperature on the aerodynamic heating in the tube train system , 2020, Advances in Aerodynamics.

[9]  Xiaofeng Yang,et al.  An Aerothermal Study of Influence of Blockage Ratio on a Supersonic Tube Train System , 2020, Journal of Thermal Science.

[10]  Tian Li,et al.  Effects of blocking ratio and Mach number on aerodynamic characteristics of the evacuated tube train , 2020 .

[11]  Yanping Yuan,et al.  Numerical study on the impact of Mach number on the coupling effect of aerodynamic heating and aerodynamic pressure caused by a tube train , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[12]  Weihua Zhang,et al.  Numerical study on wave phenomena produced by the super high-speed evacuated tube maglev train , 2019, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics.

[13]  Jinglei Xu,et al.  Computational study of axisymmetric divergent bypass dual throat nozzle , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[14]  Hong-Sun Ryou,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Hyperloop System , 2019, Energies.

[15]  R. Hruschka,et al.  In-pipe aerodynamic characteristics of a projectile in comparison with free flight for transonic Mach numbers , 2019 .

[16]  Milan Janic,et al.  Future advanced long-haul Evacuated Tube Transport (EET) system operated by TransRapid Maglev (TRM): a multidimensional examination of performance , 2019, Transportation Planning and Technology.

[17]  Z. Yaoping,et al.  CFD Analysis of Aerodynamic Drag Effects on Vacuum Tube Trains , 2019, Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  H. Olivier,et al.  Pressure wave damping in transonic airfoil flow by means of micro vortex generators , 2018, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[19]  Hyungmin Kang,et al.  A Study on the Aerodynamic Drag of Transonic Vehicle in Evacuated Tube Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2017 .

[20]  Brian A. Maicke,et al.  Quasi-one-dimensional modeling of pressure effects in supersonic nozzles , 2017 .

[21]  Jorge Sousa,et al.  Aerodynamic Design and Analysis of the Hyperloop , 2017 .

[22]  R. Hruschka,et al.  In-pipe aerodynamic characteristics of a projectile in comparison with free flight for transonic Mach numbers , 2017, Shock Waves.

[23]  Moble Benedict,et al.  Aerodynamic Simulation of High-Speed Capsule in the Hyperloop System , 2017 .

[24]  Max M. J. Opgenoord,et al.  On the Aerodynamic Design of the Hyperloop Concept , 2017 .

[25]  Dirk Ahlborn Hyperloop: The Future of Transportation , 2017 .

[26]  Roberto Palacin,et al.  Hyperloop, the Electrification of Mobility, and the Future of Rail Travel [Viewpoint] , 2016 .

[27]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Study of supersonic wave components in high-speed turbulent jets using an LES database , 2014 .

[28]  Daniel Livescu,et al.  Turbulence structure behind the shock in canonical shock–vortical turbulence interaction , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  Holger Babinsky,et al.  Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions , 2014 .

[30]  Sujay Kumar Mukherjea,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Aerodynamic Drag on Vacuum Tube High Speed Train , 2013 .

[31]  H. Olivier,et al.  Numerical investigation of unsteady wave phenomena for transonic airfoil flow , 2013 .

[32]  Brian A. Maicke,et al.  Characterization of the startup and pressure blowdown processes in rocket nozzles , 2013 .

[33]  Jiaqing Ma,et al.  Aerodynamic simulation of evacuated tube maglev trains with different streamlined designs , 2012 .

[34]  Yaoping Zhang,et al.  Numerical simulation and analysis of aerodynamic drag on a subsonic train in evacuated tube transportation , 2012 .

[35]  Hyeok-bin Kwon,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a tube train , 2011 .

[36]  Haiquan Bi,et al.  Aerodynamic Characteristics of Evacuated Tube High-Speed Train , 2009 .

[37]  Steven P Reise,et al.  Item response theory and clinical measurement. , 2009, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[38]  A. Schäfer,et al.  The future mobility of the world population , 2000 .

[39]  Diego Domínguez,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of propellers for High Altitude Pseudo-Satellites , 2020, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[40]  Felix Wong Aerodynamic Design and Optimization of a Hyperloop Vehicle , 2018 .

[41]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .