Assessing the benefits and economics of bulk energy storage technologies in the power grid

This paper presents a generic bulk energy storage dispatch model for production costing simulation, and assesses the performance and economics of storage under various system scenarios. The storage model presented captures the dynamic relationship between the reservoir energy status and the storage commitments in energy and ancillary co-optimization market, thereby enabling the dispatch of storage for both energy and cross-market arbitrage opportunities. The paper also presents a methodology to quantify the cycling costs incurred by conventional generating units due to frequent start–shut cycles and ancillary services. The bulk storage technology modeled is compressed air energy storage (CAES), and it is represented within the IEEE 24 bus reliability test system. Simulations are performed to quantify the impacts of bulk energy storage in terms of reduction in market prices, system production and cycling costs, and also to investigate the economic viability of storage projects in terms of payback periods under increasing wind penetration levels.

[1]  Yonghong Chen,et al.  Midwest iso co-optimization based real-time dispatch and pricing of energy and ancillary services , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  A. Conejo,et al.  Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market , 2000 .

[4]  Geothermal Energy Western Wind and Solar Integration Study , 2010 .

[5]  G. Baiocchi,et al.  Modeling of financial incentives for investments in energy storage systems that promote the large-scale integration of wind energy , 2013 .

[6]  Niklas Hartmann,et al.  Simulation and analysis of different adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage plant configurations , 2012 .

[7]  B. Zavadil,et al.  Grid impacts of wind power: a summary of recent studies in the United States , 2003 .

[8]  Douglas Hilleman,et al.  Power Plant Cycling Costs , 2012 .

[9]  Zuyi Li,et al.  Risk-Constrained Bidding Strategy With Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Young Min Kim,et al.  Novel concepts of compressed air energy storage and thermo-electric energy storage , 2012 .

[11]  Rajat K. Deb Operating Hydroelectric Plants and Pumped Storage Units in a Competitive Environment , 2000 .

[12]  Yuri V. Makarov,et al.  THE WIDE-AREA ENERGY STORAGE AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PHASE II Final Report - Flywheel Field Tests , 2010 .

[13]  A. Papalexopoulos,et al.  Pricing energy and ancillary services in integrated market systems by an optimal power flow , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Modeling Operational Effects of Wind Generation Within National Long-Term Infrastructure Planning Software , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Kyle Bradbury,et al.  Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets , 2014 .

[16]  N. Pearre,et al.  Technoeconomic feasibility of grid storage: Mapping electrical services and energy storage technologies , 2015 .

[17]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Evolution of operating reserve determination in wind power integration studies , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[18]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Compressed air energy storage: State space modeling and performance analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[19]  James D. McCalley,et al.  High-Fidelity Dispatch Model of Storage Technologies for Production Costing Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[20]  P. Denholm,et al.  The value of compressed air energy storage in energy and reserve markets , 2011 .