Exploring the trend of walkability measures by applying hierarchical clustering technique

Abstract Introduction Over the last two decades, many walkability attributes and variables have been considered in the evaluation of walkability scores with various methods and approaches. This study investigates the recent trend of walkability measures in terms of the scale of analysis, the case study location, the type of measurements, the data collection tool, the analysis method, and the research field. Methods In a review of existing literature, this paper analyzes and compares the walkability studies over the past two decades. A total of 75 articles from 40 journals and conference proceedings were selected through a systematic and sequential procedure. In order to explore the research trend among the reviewed articles, we applied a hierarchical clustering technique. A meta-analysis was performed to systematically assess the results of previous walkability studies to derive conclusions about the future direction of research. Results The result of this review reveals that recent walkability studies in North America have prevailed in a street-level microscopic analysis while the others in Asia and Europe have focused on both large and small-scale walkability analysis. Advanced images and instrument audit tools are being applied nowadays in addition to traditional physical audit tools for measuring walkability. In recent years, urban design qualities objectively measuring at a street level (e.g., comfort/convenience, aesthetics, sidewalk design, etc.) have been widely used in determining walkability in lieu of the traditionally used attributes (e.g., roadway level of service). Conclusion This study presents a future direction for walkability studies along with the recent trend in walkability measures and data analysis. Walkability studies have attracted significant attention more recently than in previous years. The recent trend of automated and systematic walkability data collection will eventually enable detailed analysis at a large scale and contribute to advancing walkability studies.

[1]  Emily Talen,et al.  Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods , 2014 .

[2]  Julien O. Teitler,et al.  Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[4]  M. Southworth Walkable Suburbs?: An Evaluation of Neotraditional Communities at the Urban Edge , 1997 .

[5]  Fiona Bull,et al.  The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Jae Seung Lee,et al.  Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkability on Sustainable Mode Choice Decisions , 2014 .

[7]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[8]  Michael A.B. van Eggermond,et al.  Introducing the pedestrian accessibility tool (PAT): Open source GIS-based walkability analysis , 2016 .

[9]  William H. Greene,et al.  Validating Urban Design Measures , 2013 .

[10]  Yi Lu,et al.  Using Google Street View to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[11]  Todd Litman,et al.  Economic Value of Walkability Economic Value of Walkability , 2022 .

[12]  Weixing Zhang,et al.  Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , 2015 .

[13]  Jennifer Ailshire,et al.  Using Google Earth to conduct a neighborhood audit: reliability of a virtual audit instrument. , 2010, Health & place.

[14]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  A Allan Walking As a Local Transport Modal Choice in Adelaide , 2001 .

[16]  Eleanor McLellan,et al.  Distinguishing the Trees from the Forest: Applying Cluster Analysis to Thematic Qualitative Data , 2003 .

[17]  J. Sallis,et al.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[18]  Li Yin,et al.  Street level urban design qualities for walkability: Combining 2D and 3D GIS measures , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[19]  Manoranjan Parida,et al.  MODELLING PERCEIVED PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE OF SIDEWALKS: A STRUCTURAL EQUATION APPROACH , 2019, Transport.

[20]  M. J. Koohsari,et al.  Validity of Walk Score® as a measure of neighborhood walkability in Japan , 2018, Preventive medicine reports.

[21]  Ann Lewins,et al.  Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2007 .

[22]  A. Moudon,et al.  Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed-Use, Medium-Density Environments , 1997 .

[23]  E. Chan,et al.  International Research Trends and Methods for Walkability and Their Enlightenment in China , 2016 .

[24]  Zhenxin Wang,et al.  Measuring visual enclosure for street walkability: Using machine learning algorithms and Google Street View imagery , 2016 .

[25]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[26]  Malika Charrad,et al.  NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set , 2014 .

[27]  Laura Macia,et al.  Using Clustering as a Tool:Mixed Methods in Qualitative Data Analysis , 2015 .

[28]  Louise Potvin,et al.  From walkability to active living potential: an "ecometric" validation study. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  Zhenfeng Shao,et al.  ‘Big data’ for pedestrian volume: Exploring the use of Google Street View images for pedestrian counts , 2015 .

[30]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications , 2019, Journal of Transport Geography.

[31]  Oliver Duke-Williams,et al.  Development of a novel walkability index for London, United Kingdom: cross-sectional application to the Whitehall II Study , 2016, BMC Public Health.

[32]  S. Titze,et al.  Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[33]  Alan Shiell,et al.  The association between sidewalk length and walking for different purposes in established neighborhoods , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[34]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .

[35]  Arnaldo Cecchini,et al.  Towards Automatic Assessment of Perceived Walkability , 2018, ICCSA.

[36]  Chris Webster,et al.  Personalized walkability assessment for pedestrian paths: An as-built BIM approach using ubiquitous augmented reality (AR) smartphone and deep transfer learning , 2018 .

[37]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[38]  Mohamed Atef Elhamy Kamel,et al.  Encouraging walkability in GCC cities: smart urban solutions , 2013 .

[39]  Hao Wang,et al.  Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis , 2019, Cities.

[40]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Assessing Built Environment Walkability using Activity-Space Summary Measures. , 2016, Journal of transport and land use.

[41]  A. Bauman,et al.  Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. , 2007, Health & place.

[42]  A. Bauman,et al.  Associations of Location and Perceived Environmental Attributes with Walking in Neighborhoods , 2004, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[43]  Ahmed M. Elgammal,et al.  Segmentation of occluded sidewalks in satellite images , 2012, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012).

[44]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[45]  The Walking Security Index and Pedestrians’ Security in Urban Areas , 2004 .

[46]  Yi Lu,et al.  The Association of Urban Greenness and Walking Behavior: Using Google Street View and Deep Learning Techniques to Estimate Residents’ Exposure to Urban Greenness , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[47]  Ann Forsyth What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design , 2015 .

[48]  Yuehong Chen,et al.  Assessing Neighborhood Walkability Based on Usage Characteristics of Amenities under Chinese Metropolises Context , 2018, Sustainability.

[49]  Marc Schlossberg,et al.  Active Community Environments and Health: The Relationship of Walkable and Safe Communities to Individual Health , 2006 .

[50]  Sybil Derrible,et al.  Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI) , 2014 .

[51]  J. Sallis,et al.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[52]  I. Audirac Stated Preference for Pedestrian Proximity: An Assessment of New Urbanist Sense of Community , 1999 .

[53]  J. Sallis,et al.  Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality , 2006 .

[54]  J. Gower A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties , 1971 .

[55]  David S. Vale,et al.  Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility , 2016 .

[56]  C. Nykiforuk,et al.  Check the score: Field validation of Street Smart Walk Score in Alberta, Canada , 2016, Preventive medicine reports.

[57]  Andrew L Dannenberg,et al.  Assessing the Walkability of the Workplace: A New Audit Tool , 2005, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[58]  Inhi Kim,et al.  A study of delay-based level of service on pedestrian facility , 2013 .

[59]  C. Michael Hall,et al.  Walk score® and its potential contribution to the study of active transport and walkability: A critical and systematic review , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[60]  A. Bauman,et al.  Residents' perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. , 2005, Health & place.

[61]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Walkability: Which Measure to Choose, Where to Measure It, and How? , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[62]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Investigating the association between streetscapes and human walking activities using Google Street View and human trajectory data , 2018, Trans. GIS.

[63]  A. Khattak,et al.  Walkability in the Connected and Automated Vehicle Era: A U.S. Perspective on Research Needs , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[64]  Linda B. Dixon,et al.  Bicycle and Pedestrian Level-of-Service Performance Measures and Standards for Congestion Management Systems , 1996 .

[65]  Peiqin Gu,et al.  Using Open Source Data to Measure Street Walkability and Bikeability in China: A Case of Four Cities , 2018 .

[66]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH , 2018, Journal of Transport Geography.

[67]  Miles Tight,et al.  A comparison of three methods for assessing the walkability of the pedestrian environment , 2011 .

[68]  N Gallin Quantifying Pedestrian Friendliness - Guidelines for Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service , 2001 .

[69]  Raymond Isaacs,et al.  The Urban Picturesque: An Aesthetic Experience of Urban Pedestrian Places , 2000 .

[70]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  Active Neighborhood Checklist: A User-Friendly and Reliable Tool for Assessing Activity Friendliness , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[71]  Stefan Müller Arisona,et al.  StreetVizor: Visual Exploration of Human-Scale Urban Forms Based on Street Views , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[72]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  Mapping Urban Landscapes Along Streets Using Google Street View , 2017 .

[73]  A. Bauman,et al.  Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[74]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment , 2007 .

[75]  Development of a Neighbourhood Walkability Index for Porto Metropolitan Area. How Strongly Is Walkability Associated with Walking for Transport? , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[76]  A. Khattak,et al.  Can New Urbanism Encourage Physical Activity?: Comparing a New Urbanist Neighborhood with Conventional Suburbs , 2006 .

[77]  S. Handy Urban Form and Pedestrian Choices: Study of Austin Neighborhoods , 1996 .

[78]  Shima Hamidi,et al.  Examining the Impacts of Street-Level Built Environmental and Urban Design Qualities on Walking Behavior in Downtown Dallas, Texas , 2018 .

[79]  Yao Shen,et al.  Street-Frontage-Net: urban image classification using deep convolutional neural networks , 2018, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[80]  F. Moura,et al.  Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon , 2017 .