The integration of fuzzy sets and statistics: toward strict falsification in the social sciences

Whilst statistics take up a prominent place in the social science research toolkit, some old problems that have been associated there with have not been fully resolved. These problems include bias through the inclusion of irrelevant variation and the exclusion of relevant variation, which may lead to hidden and spurious correlations in more extreme—however not at all unthinkable—cases. These issues have been addressed by Ragin by building a case for the usage of fuzzy set theory in social science. In this paper, we take a complementary view, insofar as we incorporate fuzzy set theory in current statistical analyses. Apart from shedding new light on the main issues associated with (population based) statistics, this approach also offers interesting prospects for the falsification of theories—rather than single relations between variables—in the social sciences.

[1]  L. Zadeh.  Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[2]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  Realism and the Aim of Science: From the Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1992 .

[3]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  The Chances of Explanation: Causal Explanation in the Social, Medical, and Physical Sciences , 1989 .

[4]  Richard Rosenfeld,et al.  Crime and the American Dream , 1993 .

[5]  Karl Raimund Sir Popper,et al.  Realism and the aim of science , 1983 .

[6]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[7]  Scott R. Eliason,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Descriptive Measures in Fuzzy-Set Analysis , 2009 .

[8]  Carolyn Hoyle,et al.  What is Criminology , 2011 .

[9]  Rudolf Seising.  Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives: Philosophy and Logic, Criticisms and Applications , 2009 .

[10]  Richard Jones.  Some remarks about What is Criminology?: Talk to mark the launch of Bosworth and Hoyle (eds), What is Criminology? (Oxford University Press) , 2011 .

[11]  Lars Winter,et al.  Fuzzy thinking in sociology , 2009 .

[12]  N. Cartwright.  Causal Laws and Effective Strategies , 1979 .

[13]  Michael R. Gottfredson.  Some Advantages of a Crime-free Criminology , 2011 .

[14]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[15]  Stephen A. Cernkovich,et al.  Race, Crime, and the American Dream , 2000 .

[16]  Timothy C. Hart,et al.  The Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations: An Exploratory Method for Discrete Multivariate Analyses of Crime Data , 2008 .

[17]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1984 .

[18]  M. K. Luhandjula.  Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing , 2013 .

[19]  J. Harloff.  Extracting cover sets from free fuzzy sorting data , 2011 .

[20]  W. Salmon.  Four decades of scientific explanation , 1989 .

[21]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Exploring the Social Context of Instrumental and Expressive Homicides: An Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[23]  Heng Xiao,et al.  A New Representation Theorem for Elastic Constitutive Equations of Cubic Crystals , 1998 .

[24]  L. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty , 1992 .

[25]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[26]  János Fodor,et al.  A new look at fuzzy connectives , 1993 .

[27]  Fred I. Dretske,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL VS. BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS OF BEHAVIOR , 2004 .

[28]  Badredine Arfi,et al.  Probing the Democratic Peace Argument Using Linguistic Fuzzy Logic , 2009 .

[29]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives , 2009 .

[30]  Fred I. Dretske.  Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes , 1990 .

[31]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[32]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..