Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties.

Using first-order kinetic empirical models to estimate landfill gas (LFG) generation and collection rates is well recognized in the literature. The uncertainty in the estimated LFG generation rates is a major challenge in evaluating performance of LFG collection and LFG to energy facilities. In this investigation, four methods for quantifying first-order LFG generation model parameters, methane generation potential, L(0), and methane generation rate constant, k, were evaluated. It was found that the model is insensitive to the approach taken in quantifying the parameters. However, considering the recognition of using the model in the literature, the optimum method to estimate L(0) and k is to determine L(0) using disposed municipal solid waste composition and laboratory component specific methane potential values. The k value can be selected by model fitting and regression using the first-order model if LFG collection data are available. When such data are not available, k can be selected from technical literature, based on site conditions. For five Florida case-study landfills L(0) varied from 56 to 77 m(3) Mg(-1), and k varied from 0.04 to 0.13 yr(-1) for the traditional landfills and was 0.10 yr(-1) for the wet cell. Model predictions of LFG collection rates were on average lower than actual collection. The uncertainty (coefficient of variation) in modeled LFG generation rates varied from ±11% to ±17% while landfills were open, ±9% to ±18% at the end of waste placement, and ±16% to ±203% 50 years after waste placement ended.

[1]  Tuomas Laurila,et al.  Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  H. Lanier Hickman,et al.  Solid Waste Association of North America , 1992, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  André Faaij,et al.  (Mitigation) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the , 2012 .

[4]  T. Hansen,et al.  Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. , 2004, Waste management.

[5]  Andrea Corti,et al.  LANDFILL GAS ENERGY RECOVERY: ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FOR A STUDY CASE , 2007 .

[6]  Hans Oonk,et al.  Validation of landfill gas formation models , 1995 .

[7]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Biodegradability of Municipal Solid Waste Components in Laboratory-Scale Landfills , 1997 .

[8]  Morton A. Barlaz,et al.  Composition of Municipal Solid Waste in the United States and Implications for Carbon Sequestration and Methane Yield , 2009 .

[9]  J. Bogner,et al.  Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems? , 2006, Waste management.

[10]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  Controls on Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency: Instantaneous and Lifetime Performance , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  S. Machado,et al.  Methane generation in tropical landfills: simplified methods and field results. , 2009, Waste management.

[12]  R. C. Joshi,et al.  A model to estimate the methane generation rate constant in sanitary landfills using fuzzy synthetic evaluation , 2006, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[13]  S. Thompson,et al.  Building a better methane generation model: Validating models with methane recovery rates from 35 Canadian landfills. , 2009, Waste management.