Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severity.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multislice computed tomography (MSCT) provides a reliable, noninvasive imaging modality for identification of patients with degenerative aortic valve stenosis (AS) by quantifying the aortic valve area (AVA) in comparison to the accepted diagnostic standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). BACKGROUND Management of patients with degenerative AS is based on the severity of disease. The severity of AS in clinical practice is assessed by TTE and classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the AVA. METHODS Forty-six patients were examined with contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated, 16-row MSCT for the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy. In 30 patients, quantification of the AVA with MSCT was compared to TTE using the continuity equation with Doppler velocity-time integral for calculation of the AVA. RESULTS Sensitivity of MSCT for the identification of patients with degenerative AS was 100%, and the specificity was 93.7%. Thirty of 46 patients had AS determined by TTE. Quantification of AVA by MSCT (mean AVA = 0.94 cm2) in patients with AS showed a good correlation to TTE (r = 0.89; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman plot illustrated good intermodality agreement between the two methods (limits of agreement, 0.20; 0.29). CONCLUSIONS Multislice computed tomography may provide an accurate, noninvasive imaging technique for detection of patients with AS and quantification of AVA.

[1]  J. Nordrehaug,et al.  Factors affecting Doppler echocardiographic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[4]  J Simon,et al.  New technical developments in multislice CT , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[5]  J. Dumesnil,et al.  Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Catherine M. Otto,et al.  Clinical Factors Associated With Calcific Aortic Valve Disease , 1997 .

[7]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  V. Štísová Effective dose to patient during cardiac interventional procedures (Prague workplaces). , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  C. Kim,et al.  Influence of Ejection Fraction and Valvular Regurgitation on the Accuracy of Aortic Valve Area Determination , 2001, Echocardiography.

[10]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[11]  J Simon,et al.  New Technical Developments in Multislice CT, Part 2: Sub-Millimeter 16-Slice Scanning and Increased Gantry Rotation Speed for Cardiac Imaging , 2002, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[12]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[13]  C. Claussen,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Eugenio Picano,et al.  Economic and biological costs of cardiac imaging , 2005, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[15]  C. Hamm,et al.  Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[18]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  C. Herzog,et al.  Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality , 2002, European Radiology.

[20]  Pedro A. Lemos,et al.  Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  J. Debatin,et al.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  Peter M T Pattynama,et al.  Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. , 2003, Radiology.