Forest fire prevention management legal regime between China and the United States

Precautions against forest fires, a significant element in the prevention and reduction of natural disasters in China, are very important to the development of public emergency systems, as well as to the safety of forest resources, ecology, people’s lives and properties. The USA has extensive experience in forest fire management, which has been widely accepted and used by other countries. The precautions taken by China and the USA to prevent forest fires have been compared in a great number of previous studies. However, most of the studies have focused merely on fire extinguishing technologies and management methods; they have lacked a comparative study on the legal aspects of management. This paper will consider five distinct aspects related to forest fire management between China and the USA and will analyze the similarities and differences as well as study other features to facilitate work related to precautions against forest fires in China.

[1]  Elisa Morgera,et al.  Forest Fires and the Law: A Guide for National Drafters based on the Fire Management Voluntary Guidelines , 2009 .

[2]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  The National Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies , 2010 .

[4]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS , 2002 .

[5]  A. Andersen Fire ecology and management , 1996 .

[6]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Vulnerability of land systems to fire: Interactions among humans, climate, the atmosphere, and ecosystems , 2006 .

[7]  Martin E. Alexander,et al.  Fire on Earth: An Introduction , 2014 .

[8]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest , 2005 .

[9]  S. Stephens,et al.  FEDERAL FOREST‐FIRE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES , 2005 .

[10]  M. Finney Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire Growth and Behavior , 2001, Forest Science.

[11]  G. Certini Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review , 2005, Oecologia.

[12]  Steven R. Miller,et al.  Re‐introducing fire at the urban/wild‐land interface: planning for success , 2003 .

[13]  Cong Xi-don Characteristics of The Forest Fire Prevention and Control Management Features and its Enlightenment to China , 2014 .

[14]  António Vieira,et al.  Fire and soils : key concepts and recent advances , 2012 .

[15]  M. Adams,et al.  Mega-fires, tipping points and ecosystem services: Managing forests and woodlands in an uncertain future , 2013 .

[16]  Hayley Hesseln,et al.  The Effect of the Wildland-Urban Interface on Prescribed Burning Costs in the Pacific Northwestern United States , 2004 .

[17]  Matthew P. Thompson,et al.  A national approach for integrating wildfire simulation modeling into Wildland Urban Interface risk assessments within the United States , 2013 .

[18]  R. Ottmar,et al.  Baseline Measurements of Smoke Exposure Among Wildland Firefighters , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.