Optimum design of the slotted-interdigitated channels flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cells with consideration of the gas diffusion layer intrusion

The design of the flow field greatly affects the flow distribution and the final performance of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system. The clamping force between the gas diffusion layer (GDL) and the flow field plate (FFP) will cause the inhomogeneous compression of the GDL. Then the GDL will be intruded into the reactant gas channels and eventually change the flow distribution. This paper presents a study on the effect of the intrusion of the GDL on the flow field in a PEMFC, and tries to explain the reason for poor performance of the previous design of the flow field other than those have been studied in other papers such as GDL roughness, porosity, etc. First of all, a linear analytical model is used to analyze the sensitivities of the flow field to the GDL intrusion, and then used to estimate the effect of the GDL intrusion on the flow field distribution. Secondly, a multi-objective optimization model is proposed to eliminate the nonuniform distribution in the flow field with the GDL intrusion taken into consideration. Subsequently, three different designs are analyzed and compared with each other as a demonstration to show the effect of the GDL intrusion. From the analysis results, it is recommended that the effect of the GDL intrusion on the multi-depth flow field should be taken into consideration and the flow field should be insensitive to the GDL intrusion to obtain high robust performance. The results obtained in the study provide the designer some useful guidelines in the concept design of flow field configurations.

[1]  Chengwei Wu,et al.  Influence of clamping force on the performance of PEMFCs , 2007 .

[2]  Nobuyuki Oshima,et al.  Numerical Study of Pressure Drop in the Separator Channel and Gas Diffusion Layer of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell and Deformation Effect of Porous Media , 2008 .

[3]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Optimization of key parameters in the proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[4]  Takuya Taniuchi,et al.  Numerical Analysis of Current Distribution at Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Compared by Segmented Current Collector Cell , 2007 .

[5]  Olli Himanen,et al.  PEMFC temperature distribution caused by inhomogeneous compression of GDL , 2007 .

[6]  Peng Hu,et al.  Optimization design of slotted-interdigitated channel for stamped thin metal bipolar plate in proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2009 .

[7]  N. Djilali,et al.  Effect of compression on liquid water transport and microstructure of PEMFC gas diffusion layers , 2007 .

[8]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Analysis of reactant gas transport in a PEM fuel cell with partially blocked fuel flow channels , 2005 .

[9]  Hyung Jin Sung,et al.  Effect of GDL permeability on water and thermal management in PEMFCs - I. Isotropic and anisotropic permeability , 2008 .

[10]  D. Guinea,et al.  Electric modelling and image analysis of channel flow in bipolar plates , 2007 .

[11]  Chin-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Design for geometric parameters of PEM fuel cell by integrating computational fluid dynamics code with optimization method , 2007 .

[12]  Sanjiv Kumar,et al.  Design and Optimization of the Gas Channels of a PEMFC Using CFD-Based Simulation , 2006 .

[13]  P. Sui,et al.  A numerical investigation of the effects of compression force on PEM fuel cell performance , 2008 .

[14]  Ay Su,et al.  A three-dimensional full-cell CFD model used to investigate the effects of different flow channel designs on PEMFC performance , 2007 .

[15]  A. Suleman,et al.  Numerical optimization of proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathodes , 2007 .

[16]  C. Min,et al.  Performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with a stepped flow field design , 2009 .

[17]  Sreenivas Jayanti,et al.  Pressure drop and flow distribution in multiple parallel-channel configurations used in proton-exchange membrane fuel cell stacks , 2006 .

[18]  M. Cali,et al.  Experimental analysis of cathode flow stoichiometry on the electrical performance of a PEMFC stack , 2007 .

[19]  Ay Su,et al.  The effect of low humidity on the uniformity and stability of segmented PEM fuel cells , 2008 .

[20]  Ramana G. Reddy,et al.  Effect of channel dimensions and shape in the flow-field distributor on the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2003 .

[21]  Satish G. Kandlikar,et al.  Measurement of flow maldistribution in parallel channels and its application to ex-situ and in-situ experiments in PEMFC water management studies , 2009 .

[22]  Hyung Jin Sung,et al.  Effect of GDL permeability on water and thermal management in PEMFCs—II. Clamping force , 2008 .

[23]  Chengwei Wu,et al.  Contact resistance prediction and structure optimization of bipolar plates , 2006 .

[24]  Olli Himanen,et al.  Inhomogeneous compression of PEMFC gas diffusion layer: Part II. Modeling the effect , 2007 .

[25]  Natarajan Rajalakshmi,et al.  Evaluation of current distribution in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell by segmented cell approach , 2002 .

[26]  Brant A. Peppley,et al.  Modeling the Influence of GDL and flow-field plate parameters on the reaction distribution in the PEMFC cathode catalyst layer , 2005 .

[27]  Chengwei Wu,et al.  Numerical study on the compression effect of gas diffusion layer on PEMFC performance , 2007 .

[28]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  In situ approach for current distribution measurement in fuel cells , 2006 .

[29]  Tero Hottinen,et al.  Inhomogeneous compression of PEMFC gas diffusion layer: Part I. Experimental , 2007 .

[30]  Jenn-Kun Kuo,et al.  Evaluating the enhanced performance of a novel wave-like form gas flow channel in the PEMFC using the field synergy principle , 2006 .

[31]  Ay Su,et al.  Experiment and simulation investigations for effects of flow channel patterns on the PEMFC performance , 2008 .