Multistable binocular feature-integrated percepts are frozen by intermittent presentation.

When two different stimuli are presented continuously to each eye, the percept alternates over time between the left-eye stimulus and right-eye stimulus. The perceptual alternation can be slowed or even stopped, however, if the same stimuli are presented intermittently (D. A. Leopold, M. Wilke, A. Maier, & N. K. Logothetis, 2002; J. Orbach, D. Ehrlich, & H. A. Heath, 1963). A basic question is the nature of the persisting neural representation, which mediates the stabilized percept. Is it a representation for the dominant eye, for the stimulus in one eye or for a feature-integrated percept incorporating features presented separately to each eye? We define a feature-integrated percept as one constructed by the visual system but which never is presented as a stimulus. This was tested using a feature-integrated percept resulting from rivalrous, equiluminant chromatic patterns (S. W. Hong & S. K. Shevell, 2009). Measurements showed that the feature-integrated percept was stabilized by intermittent viewing: when the percept at the end of the initial viewing period was feature-integrated, this same integrated percept was seen on subsequent intermittent presentations. The results showed that the stabilized percept from these intermittent rivalrous patterns was due to a persisting neural representation at or after binocular feature integration, not to a persisting dominant eye or neural representation of a retinal stimulus.

[1]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[3]  R Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. , 1974, Vision research.

[5]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[6]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[8]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[9]  I. Kovács,et al.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[11]  R. Blake,et al.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Alais,et al.  On Binocular Alternation , 2000, Perception.

[13]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[14]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Alexander Maier,et al.  Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns , 2003, Current Biology.

[17]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[18]  Sheng He,et al.  Local Factors Determine the Stabilization of Monocular Ambiguous and Binocular Rivalry Stimuli , 2004, Current Biology.

[19]  Robert P O'Shea.  Psychophysics: Catching the Old Codger's Eye , 2004, Current Biology.

[20]  Cynthia S. Sahm,et al.  Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C. Clifford,et al.  Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  Allan C. Dobbins,et al.  Competition in bistable vision is attribute-specific , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Sang Wook Hong,et al.  Resolution of binocular rivalry: Perceptual misbinding of color , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Onset Rivalry: Brief Presentation Isolates an Early Independent Phase of Perceptual Competition , 2007, PloS one.

[26]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[27]  Joel Pearson,et al.  Sensory memory for ambiguous vision , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  T. Knapen,et al.  The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[30]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[31]  S. Shevell,et al.  Color-Binding Errors During Rivalrous Suppression of Form , 2009, Psychological science.

[32]  Separate contributions of magno- and parvocellular streams to perceptual selection during binocular rivalry , 2010 .

[33]  V. Walsh,et al.  Human Middle Temporal Cortex, Perceptual Bias, and Perceptual Memory for Ambiguous Three-Dimensional Motion , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history , 2010, Vision Research.