Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults

Objective: We examined the usability issues associated with four touch screen gestures (clicking, dragging, zooming, and rotating) among older and younger users. Background: It is especially important to accommodate older users’ characteristics to ensure the accessibility of information and services that are important to their quality of life. Method: Forty older and 40 younger participants completed four experiments, each of which focused on one gesture. The effects of age, type of touch screen (surface acoustic wave vs. optical), inclination angle (30°, 45°, 60°, and 75°), and user interface factors (clicking: button size and spacing; dragging: dragging direction and distance; zooming: design of zooming gesture; rotating: design of rotating gesture) on user performance and satisfaction were examined. Results: Button sizes that are larger than 15.9 × 9.0 mm led to better performance and higher satisfaction. The effect of spacing was significant only when the button size was notably small or large. Rightward and downward dragging were preferred to leftward and upward dragging, respectively. The younger participants favored direct manipulation gestures using multiple fingers, whereas the older participants preferred the click-to design. The older participants working with large inclination angles of 60° to 75° reported a higher level of satisfaction than the older participants working with smaller angles. Conclusion: We proposed a set of design guidelines for touch screen user interfaces and discussed implications for the selection of appropriate technology and the configuration of the workspace. Application: The implications are useful for the design of large touch screen applications, such as desktop computers, information kiosks, and health care support systems.

[1]  Deborah Hix,et al.  Effect of Touch Screen Target Location on User Accuracy , 1990 .

[2]  Neff Walker,et al.  Mouse Accelerations and Performance of Older Computer Users , 1996 .

[3]  Laurent Misery,et al.  Sensory Function of the Skin , 2004 .

[4]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Normally aging older adults demonstrate the bilateral deficit during ramp and hold contractions. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[6]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[7]  Brenda Scott,et al.  Designing Touch Screen Numeric Keypads: Effects of Finger Size, Key Size, and Key Spacing , 1997 .

[8]  Martin Schedlbauer Effects of Key Size and Spacing on the Completion Time and Accuracy of Input Tasks on Soft Keypads Using Trackball and Touch Input , 2007 .

[9]  Eulàlia Hernández-Encuentra,et al.  ICT and Older People: Beyond Usability , 2009 .

[10]  Jae Kun Shim,et al.  The human central nervous system needs time to organize task-specific covariation of finger forces , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  Michael G. Bemben,et al.  Age-Related Alterations in Muscular Endurance , 1998, Sports medicine.

[12]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Finger interaction during accurate multi-finger force production tasks in young and elderly persons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Hackel,et al.  Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[14]  Ann Chadwick-Dias,et al.  Senior Surfers 2.0: A Re-examination of the Older Web User and the Dynamic Web , 2007, HCI.

[15]  B R Botterman,et al.  Gradation of isometric tension by different activation rates in motor units of cat flexor carpi radialis muscle. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Xiangshi Ren,et al.  Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: a study of pen-based interaction for selection tasks , 2000, TCHI.

[17]  Gale L. Martin Configuring a numeric keypad for a touch screen , 1988 .

[18]  P. Hancock,et al.  Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  Liana M. Kiff,et al.  Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Adults: Button Size and Spacing , 2007, HCI.

[20]  A. Ardila,et al.  Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: the complex effect of education. , 2000, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[21]  D. Hawthorn,et al.  Possible implications of aging for interface designers , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[22]  J. Holmes,et al.  Aging differently: Physical limitations among adults aged 50 years and over: United States, 2001-2007. , 2009, NCHS data brief.

[23]  M. Latash,et al.  Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  W. C. Howell of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society , 2010 .

[25]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Improving Touchscreen Keyboards: Design Issues and a Comparison with Other Devices , 1991, Interact. Comput..

[26]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Chinese Text Spacing on Mobile Phones for Senior Citizens , 2008 .

[27]  J. Jolles,et al.  Age-Related Decline of Psychomotor Speed: Effects of Age, Brain Health, Sex, and Education , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[29]  Robert J. Beaton,et al.  Effects Of Touch Key Size And Separation On Menu-Selection Accuracy , 1985, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[30]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Usability of Touch-Panel Interfaces for Older Adults , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[31]  Curtis B. Irwin,et al.  Effect of Touch Screen Button Size and Spacing on Touch Characteristics of Users With and Without Disabilities , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[32]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Touch a Screen or Turn a Knob: Choosing the Best Device for the Job , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[33]  K. Newell,et al.  Kinetic analysis of response variability , 1984 .

[34]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. I. Biomechanics , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  Kevin L Schultz,et al.  Optimal viewing angle for touch-screen displays: Is there such a thing? , 1998 .

[36]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension synergies: Effects of object geometry and prescribed torques , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Minoru Shinohara,et al.  Age effects on force produced by intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles and finger interaction during MVC tasks. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[38]  A. McComas,et al.  Physiological changes in ageing muscles , 1973, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[39]  Joy Goodman,et al.  OLDER ADULTS ’ USE OF COMPUTERS : A SURVEY , 2003 .

[40]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[41]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  S. Camille Peres,et al.  Examining User Preferences in Interacting with Touchscreen Devices , 2012 .

[43]  Alan M Wing,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Grip Force and Dynamics of Hand Movement , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  Gwanseob Shin,et al.  Ergonomic issues associated with the use of touchscreen desktop PC , 2011 .

[45]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Research-derived web design guidelines for older people , 2005, Assets '05.

[46]  G Kamen,et al.  Motor unit discharge behavior in older adults during maximal-effort contractions. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[47]  R M Enoka,et al.  Changes in Movement Capabilities with Aging , 1995, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[48]  J. S. Stevenson,et al.  Older Adults , 1980, Suicide Prevention.

[49]  W. Spirduso,et al.  Age differences in the expression of manual asymmetry. , 2000, Experimental aging research.

[50]  G. Yue,et al.  Effects of Aging on Hand Function , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[51]  Douglas A. Wiegmann,et al.  Disability and Orientation-Specific Performance during a Reciprocal Tapping Task , 2010 .

[52]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Mechanisms for Age-Related Changes of Fingertip Forces during Precision Gripping and Lifting in Adults , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  W. Rogers,et al.  Computer usage patterns of university faculty members across the life span , 1998 .

[54]  Neil Charness,et al.  Light Pen Use and Practice Minimize Age and Hand Performance Differences in Pointing Tasks , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[55]  A. D. Hall,et al.  Factors affecting performance using touch-entry systems: Tactual recognition fields and system accuracy. , 1988 .

[56]  Andrew Steptoe,et al.  Educational attainment but not measures of current socioeconomic circumstances are associated with leukocyte telomere length in healthy older men and women , 2011, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

[57]  Tor Ansved,et al.  Effects of ageing on the motor unit , 1995, Progress in Neurobiology.

[58]  Donald T. Kirkendall,et al.  The Effects of Aging and Training on Skeletal Muscle , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[59]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[60]  Curtis B. Irwin,et al.  Effect of Sitting or Standing on Touch Screen Performance and Touch Characteristics , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[61]  R D Peindl,et al.  Measurement of thumb abduction strength: normative data and a comparison with grip and pinch strength. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[62]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Tactile impairments cannot explain the effect of age on a grasp and lift task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  Minoru Shinohara,et al.  Effects of age and gender on finger coordination in MVC and submaximal force-matching tasks. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[64]  R. Enoka,et al.  Coactivation of the antagonist muscle does not covary with steadiness in old adults. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[65]  Weina Qu,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Smallest Comfortable Button/Icon Size on Touch Screen , 2007, HCI.

[66]  Dr. D. Kernell,et al.  Relation between isometric force and stimulus rate in cat's hindlimb motor units of different twitch contraction time , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Herbert Colle,et al.  Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference , 2004, Ergonomics.

[68]  Peter R. Francis,et al.  A comparison of prehension force control in young and elderly individuals , 1996, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[69]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Effects of immobilization on contractile properties, recruitment and firing rates of human motor units. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[71]  Trent Apted,et al.  Tabletop sharing of digital photographs for the elderly , 2006, CHI.

[72]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support , 2010, CHI.

[73]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Optimal Slope of Touch Panel : Comparison between Young and Older Adults , 2008 .

[74]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men. , 1999, Age and ageing.

[75]  E. Carmeli,et al.  The aging hand. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[76]  R. Enoka,et al.  Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[77]  F. Schmitt,et al.  Critical decline in fine motor hand movements in human aging. , 1999, Neurology.

[78]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  One-handed touchscreen input for legacy applications , 2008, CHI.

[79]  S. Iversen Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[80]  Bengt Ahlström,et al.  Overcoming touchscreen user fatigue by workplace design , 1992, CHI '92.

[81]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[82]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[83]  M. Latash,et al.  Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[84]  M. Latash,et al.  Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[85]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies , 1988, CHI '88.

[86]  W. Brown,et al.  Age-related changes in the twitch contractile properties of human thenar motor units. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[87]  M. Latash,et al.  Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[88]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch , 2007, CHI.

[89]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  User-defined gestures for surface computing , 2009, CHI.

[90]  K. J. Cole Grasp force control in older adults. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.