Framework for sensitivity and uncertainty quantification in the flutter assessment of bridges

Abstract The phenomenon of aerodynamic instability caused by wind is usually a major design criterion for long-span cable-supported bridges. If the wind speed exceeds the critical flutter speed of the bridge, this constitutes an Ultimate Limit State. The prediction of the flutter boundary therefore requires accurate and robust models. The state-of-the-art theory concerning determination of the flutter stability limit is presented. Usually bridge decks are bluff and therefore the aeroelastic forces under wind action have to be experimentally evaluated in wind tunnels or numerically computed through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The self-excited forces are modelled using aerodynamic derivatives obtained through CFD forced vibration simulations on a section model. The two-degree-of-freedom flutter limit is computed by solving the Eigenvalue problem. A probabilistic flutter analysis utilizing a meta-modelling technique is used to evaluate the effect of parameter uncertainty. A bridge section is numerically modelled in the CFD simulations. Here flutter derivatives are considered as random variables. A methodology for carrying out sensitivity analysis of the flutter phenomenon is developed. The sensitivity with respect to the uncertainty of flutter derivatives and structural parameters is considered by taking into account the probability distribution of the flutter limit. A significant influence on the flutter limit is found by including uncertainties of the flutter derivatives due to different interpretations of scatter in the CFD simulations. The results indicate that the proposed probabilistic flutter analysis provides extended information concerning the accuracy in the prediction of flutter limits. The final aim is to set up a method to estimate the flutter limit with probabilistic input parameters. Such a tool could be useful for bridge engineers at early design stages. This study shows the difficulties in this regard which have to be overcome but also highlights some interesting and promising results.

[1]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[2]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  T. Theodorsen General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[4]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[5]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  Modelling uncertainties in prediction of aeroelastic bridge behaviour , 2003 .

[6]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  An immersed interface method for the Vortex-In-Cell algorithm , 2007 .

[7]  Gianni Bartoli,et al.  A simplified approach to bridge deck flutter , 2008 .

[8]  Suren Chen,et al.  Flutter reliability analysis of suspension bridges , 2005 .

[9]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A GPU-accelerated pseudo-3D vortex method for aerodynamic analysis , 2014 .

[10]  Nicholas P. Jones,et al.  Inter-relations among flutter derivatives , 1997 .

[11]  Ru-Cheng Xiao,et al.  Probabilistic free vibration and flutter analyses of suspension bridges , 2005 .

[12]  Yaojun Ge,et al.  Computational models and methods for aerodynamic flutter of long-span bridges , 2008 .

[13]  Allan Larsen,et al.  Aeroelastic analysis of bridge girder sections based on discrete vortex simulations , 1997 .

[14]  M. Matsumoto,et al.  AERODYNAMIC DAMPING OF PRISMS , 1996 .

[15]  S. Hernández,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of bridge flutter with respect to mechanical parameters of the deck , 2004 .

[16]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Identification of flutter derivatives of bridge deck from free vibration data , 1995 .

[17]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .

[18]  Emil Simiu,et al.  Wind effects on structures : fundamentals and applications to design , 1996 .

[19]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  Reexamination of sectional aerodynamic force functions for bridges , 2001 .

[20]  Robert H. Scanlan,et al.  AIR FOIL AND BRIDGE DECK FLUTTER DERIVATIVES , 1971 .

[21]  A. Larsen,et al.  Two dimensional discrete vortex method for application to bluff body aerodynamics , 1997 .