Environmental considerations and trade-offs in purchasing of transportation services

Many companies want to reduce the environmental impact of their transports, especially CO2 emissions. This paper examines the importance large shippers attribute to environmental aspects when purchasing freight transport services and the trade-off with other aspects, specifically how these have changed over the last decade. The starting point is a proposed theoretical model for the marketing of environmental advantages in transportation services. Results from two studies are analyzed, including data from two telephone-initiated surveys in 2003 and 2012 with regard to the purchasing of freight transportation services among large shippers in manufacturing and wholesale companies in Sweden. The response rates were high (64% in 2003 and 30% in 2012) and represent a solid number of responses (in 2003, n = 406 and in 2012, n = 175). The results show that the attributed importance to environmental aspects has been stable over time. Basic service aspects of transportation services related to the reliability and transport quality were the top priorities for logistics managers when selecting transport providers, in addition to geographic coverage and a low price. Price is however most important when selecting transport solutions. Transport providers need to know shippers' preferences when considering marketing of environmentally preferable transport services.

[1]  Richard Wilding,et al.  Customer perceptions on logistics outsourcing in the European consumer goods industry , 2004 .

[2]  M. Björklund.  Influence from the business environment on environmental purchasing — Drivers and hinders of purchasing green transportation services , 2011 .

[3]  Asoke Dey,et al.  Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda , 2011 .

[4]  Susan Wolf Ditkoff,et al.  Cómo impulsar la filantropía , 2010 .

[5]  C. John Langley,et al.  Buyer observations of the US third‐party logistics market , 1996 .

[6]  T. Melewar,et al.  Marketing perspectives of logistics service providers , 2011 .

[7]  Mats I. Johansson,et al.  Influence of context on the purchasing process for freight transport services , 2014 .

[8]  Vinh V. Thai,et al.  Logistics service quality: conceptual model and empirical evidence , 2013 .

[9]  M. Teper.  Large N , 2005, hep-lat/0509019.

[10]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  Review of Road Hauliers' Measures for Increasing Transport Efficiency and Sustainability in Urban Freight Distribution , 2013 .

[11]  M. Christopher,et al.  The role of marketing in creating a supply chain orientation within the firm , 2013 .

[12]  Lutz Preuss.  In Dirty Chains? Purchasing and Greener Manufacturing , 2001 .

[13]  H. Walker,et al.  Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors , 2008 .

[14]  R. Lieb,et al.  Environmental sustainability in the third‐party logistics (3PL) industry , 2010 .

[15]  Nelson Oly Ndubisi,et al.  Stakeholder Influences on Environmental Marketing , 2011 .

[16]  Martin Christopher,et al.  The logistics service providers in eco-efficiency innovation: an empirical study , 2013 .

[17]  O. I. Tukel,et al.  Outsourcing decision support: a survey of benefits, risks, and decision factors , 2006 .

[18]  Rudolf O. Large,et al.  Procurement of logistics services and sustainable development in Europe: Fields of activity and empirical results , 2013 .

[19]  Hokey Min,et al.  Green Purchasing Strategies: Trends and Implications , 1997 .

[20]  Dorin Militaru,et al.  Shippers’ ecological buying behaviour towards logistics services in France , 2011 .

[21]  Catrin Lammgård.  Intermodal train services: A business challenge and a measure for decarbonisation for logistics service providers , 2012 .

[22]  J. Lash,et al.  Competitive advantage on a warming planet. , 2007, Harvard business review.