Impact of materials exposure on assembly workstation performance

This paper examines how the choice of materials exposure impacts workstation performance, in terms of non-value-adding work, space requirements and ergonomics. In a typical Swedish automotive setting, components are exposed in wooden pallets with frames beside the assembly line and supplied by forklift truck. In a case study, three workstations on an assembly line were studied and redesigned following the principles of lean production, using smaller plastic containers for the materials exposure. After the redesign, the space required for materials was reduced by 67%, non-value-adding work decreased by 20%, and walking distance was reduced by 52%. Furthermore, the ergonomics for the assembly operator improved greatly, with a 92% reduction of potentially harmful picking activities, thereby almost eliminating potentially harmful body movements. The theoretical contribution of this paper is firstly the development of an analysis model describing the impact of material exposure on workstation performance and secondly development of the existing categorisation of work operations to include different materials handling activities. The most important managerial implication is an increased understanding of the relationship between space, ergonomics, non-value-adding work and materials exposure. These findings have direct implications on workstation design in industry.

[1]  Roger E. Olson,et al.  Lean Assembly: The Nuts And Bolts of Making Assembly Operations Flow , 2003 .

[2]  Pascal Dennis,et al.  Lean Production Simplified : A Plain-Language Guide to the World's Most Powerful Production System , 2002 .

[3]  Lars Medbo,et al.  Materialfasader och förpackningar vid manuell montering i japansk och svensk fordonsindustri , 2005 .

[4]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Production system design elements influencing productivity and ergonomics - A case study of parallel and serial flow strategies , 2006 .

[5]  Jonathan F. Bard,et al.  A Review of: “Lean Logistics: The Nuts and Bolts of Delivering Materials and Goods” , 2005 .

[6]  J Winkel,et al.  Guidelines for occupational musculoskeletal load as a basis for intervention: a critical review. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Data collection and analysis of manual work using video recording and personal computer techniques , 1997 .

[8]  Kay Wild On the selection of mass production systems , 1975 .

[9]  J. Bicheno The New Lean Toolbox: Towards Fast, Flexible Flow , 2008 .

[10]  Yasuhiro Monden,et al.  Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time , 1993 .

[11]  Stella Y. Hua,et al.  Research issues on factors influencing the choice of kitting versus line stocking , 2010 .

[12]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  A methodology for the selection of assembly systems , 1989 .

[13]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Some considerations relating to the reintroduction of assembly lines in the Swedish automotive industry , 2004 .

[14]  Nils Boysen,et al.  Assembly line balancing: Which model to use when? , 2006 .

[15]  Gary Conner,et al.  Lean Manufacturing for the Small Shop , 2001 .

[16]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Kitting versus line stocking: A conceptual framework and a descriptive model☆ , 1992 .

[17]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Time--a key issue for musculoskeletal health and manufacturing. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Soumen Ghosh,et al.  A comprehensive literature review and analysis of the design, balancing and scheduling of assembly systems , 1989 .

[19]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[20]  R. Norman,et al.  A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Nick Rich,et al.  The seven value stream mapping tools , 1997 .

[22]  W Patrick Neumann,et al.  Integrating ergonomics into production system development--the Volvo Powertrain case. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Lars Medbo,et al.  The impact of materials feeding design on assembly process performance , 2008 .

[24]  E. Poutsma,et al.  EUROPEAN FOUNDATION for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions , 1999 .

[25]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .