CONTROL BY (STATE–MODULATED) INTERCONNECTION OF PORT–HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS

Abstract It is well known that the dynamics of many physical processes can be suitably described by Port–Hamiltonian (PH) models. In this paper we consider the Passivity–Based Control (PBC) technique of Control by Interconnection (CbI), where the controller is another PH system connected to the plant to add up their energy functions. We propose two extensions to this method, first, we exploit the non–uniqueness of the PH representation of the system to generate new cyclo–passive outputs. Applying CbI through these new port variables overcomes the so–called dissipation obstacle. Second, when the plant state variables are measurable, we show that the conditions for applicability of the method can be relaxed replacing the simple unitary feedback by a state–modulated interconnection. A central contribution of the paper is the proof that the conditions for energy shaping via CbI are equivalent to those imposed in Interconnection and Damping Assignment PBC, providing in this way a nice geometric interpretation to this successful controller design technique.

[1]  J. Willems Dissipative dynamical systems part I: General theory , 1972 .

[2]  P. Moylan,et al.  Dissipative Dynamical Systems: Basic Input-Output and State Properties , 1980 .

[3]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial , 1988, Proceedings of the 27th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Bernhard Maschke,et al.  An intrinsic Hamiltonian formulation of network dynamics: Non-standard Poisson structures and gyrators , 1992 .

[5]  J. Marsden,et al.  Introduction to mechanics and symmetry , 1994 .

[6]  D. Mayne Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design [Book Review] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Toshiharu Sugie,et al.  Canonical Transformation and Stabilization of Generalized Hamiltonian Systems , 1998 .

[8]  A. Schaft,et al.  On Representations and Integrability of Mathematical Structures in Energy-Conserving Physical Systems , 1999 .

[9]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Controlled Lagrangians and the stabilization of mechanical systems. I. The first matching theorem , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Putting energy back in control , 2001 .

[11]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Controlled Lagrangians and the stabilization of mechanical systems. II. Potential shaping , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Stabilization of a class of underactuated mechanical systems via interconnection and damping assignment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Interconnection and damping assignment passivity-based control of port-controlled Hamiltonian systems , 2002, Autom..

[14]  Jacquelien M. A. Scherpen,et al.  Power shaping: a new paradigm for stabilization of nonlinear RLC circuits , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Interconnection and Damping Assignment Passivity-Based Control: A Survey , 2004, Eur. J. Control.

[16]  Jacquelien M. A. Scherpen,et al.  An energy-balancing perspective of interconnection and damping assignment control of nonlinear systems , 2003, Autom..

[17]  Dimitri Jeltsema,et al.  Power Shaping Control of Nonlinear Systems: A Benchmark Example , 2006 .

[18]  Jan C. Willems,et al.  Dissipative Dynamical Systems , 2007, Eur. J. Control.