Genetics Reasoning with Multiple External Representations

This paper explores a case study of a class of Year 10 students (n=24) whose learning of genetics involved activities of BioLogica, a computer program that features multiple external representations (MERs). MERs can be verbal/textual, visual-graphical, or in other formats. Researchers claim that the functions of MERs in supporting student learning are to complement information or processes, to constrain the interpretation of abstract concepts, and to construct new viable conceptions. Over decades, research has shown that genetics remains linguistically and conceptually difficult for high school students. This case study using data from multiple sources enabled students' development of genetics reasoning to be interpreted from an epistemological perspective. Pretest-posttest comparison after six weeks showed that most of the students (n=20) had improved their genetics reasoning but only for easier reasoning types. Findings indicated that the MERs in BioLogica contributed to students' development of genetics reasoning by engendering their motivation and interest but only when students were mindful in their learning. Based on triangulation of data from multiple sources, MERs in BioLogica appeared to support learning largely by constraining students' interpretation of phenomena of genetics.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[3]  James H. Stewart,et al.  Difficulties Experienced by High School Students when Learning Basic Mendelian Genetics. , 1982 .

[4]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[5]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula , 1984 .

[6]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[7]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[8]  G. Salomon,et al.  Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer , 1987 .

[9]  J. T. Pearson,et al.  Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 1, A literature review and classification scheme , 1988 .

[10]  D. Treagust.  Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science , 1988 .

[11]  Noel Richard Thorley.  The role of the conceptual change model in the interpretation of classroom interactions , 1990 .

[12]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[13]  Mark W. Hackling.  Application of genetics knowledge to the solution of pedigree problems , 1994 .

[14]  A. Odom,et al.  Development and application of a two‐tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction , 1995 .

[15]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom , 1997 .

[16]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. , 1998 .

[17]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. , 1998 .

[18]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[19]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[20]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[21]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Revisiting learning difficulties in biology , 1999 .

[22]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[23]  John Leach,et al.  Chromosomes: the missing link — young people's understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation , 2000 .

[24]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Interpretive Research in Science Education , 2000 .