Differences in the abilities of individual fingers during the performance of fast, repetitive tapping movements

Using 12 healthy male subjects, the dynamic motor ability of individual fingers was investigated under four different finger tapping conditions. These were: maximum speed tapping with one finger (single-finger tapping), alternate movement of two fingers (double-finger tapping), double-finger tapping in an unsupported condition, and submaximum constant speed tapping with one finger in a passive manner. Key-contact forces for all fingers and the movement velocity of the tapping finger were monitored. With the exception of the unsupported condition, non-tapping fingers were maintained in contact with designated keys during the tapping tasks. It was found that the index finger attained the fastest cadence and greatest movement velocity, followed by the middle, little and ring fingers, respectively. Subjective assessment of rank order of "difficulty" of tapping by the subjects was highly correlated with tapping cadence. Thus dynamic motor function, as indicated by rapid, repetitive movement, differs among the individual fingers. Parallel changes were observed in the key-contact force of the neighboring non-tapping fingers during tapping. The range of the non-tapping finger forces was largest during tapping by the ring finger. A similar trend was found for passive tapping, during which the magnitude of key-contact force was less than one-third of that observed during active tapping. The lower cadence achieved by the ring finger may be attributed more to a lack of independence at the level of voluntary neuromuscular control, than to innate mechanical interaction with the other fingers. Tapping cadence of each finger was lower for the double-finger mode than for the single-finger mode. The magnitude of the observed decrease in cadence during double-finger tapping was, on the other hand, strongly dependent on finger-combination. The decrease was smallest for the index-middle finger-combination, and greatest for the ring-little finger-combination. Compatibilities with other fingers can play an essential role in the dynamic motor function of individual fingers. During the unsupported task, in which interactions were diminished by allowing all fingers to move freely, tapping cadence increased markedly. Therefore, the lower cadences observed in specific finger-combinations may be partly attributed to anatomical and neural interdigit interactions.

[1]  M J Botte,et al.  The functional significance of the long extensors and juncturae tendinum in finger extension. , 1993, The Journal of hand surgery.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[3]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  M H Schieber,et al.  Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  P. Cheney,et al.  Corticomotoneuronal postspike effects in shoulder, elbow, wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand muscles during a reach and prehension task. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H Kinoshita,et al.  Grip posture and forces during holding cylindrical objects with circular grips. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[8]  N. Kamakura,et al.  Patterns of static prehension in normal hands. , 1980, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[9]  H Kinoshita,et al.  Temporal and force characteristics of fast double-finger, single-finger and hand tapping , 2001, Ergonomics.

[10]  J. Webster,et al.  External finger forces in submaximal five-finger static pinch prehension. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[11]  R S Fisher,et al.  Motor and sensory cortex in humans: topography studied with chronic subdural stimulation. , 1992, Neurosurgery.

[12]  R. Roy,et al.  Architecture of the hind limb muscles of cats: Functional significance , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[13]  J. Duchateau,et al.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  R. Lieber,et al.  Architecture of selected muscles of the arm and forearm: anatomy and implications for tendon transfer. , 1992, The Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Dissociation of supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex in human subjects when comparing index and little finger movements with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  G de Groot,et al.  The strength of the hand. , 1970, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[18]  Tomoko Aoki,et al.  Difference in dynamic motor function of individual fingers and effects of long-term training. , 2002 .

[19]  Marc H. Schieber,et al.  Tension Distribution to the Five Digits of the Hand by Neuromuscular Compartments in the Macaque Flexor Digitorum Profundus , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  S. Wise,et al.  The Acquisition of Motor Behavior in Vertebrates , 1996 .