Update on the road safety benefits of intelligent vehicle technologies: research in 2008-2009

Previously, a comprehensive range of 34 safety-related intelligent vehicle technologies (IVTs) has been evaluated for effectiveness in Australia, based on a business case model developed by the Transport Accident Commission (TAC) in Victoria. This paper reviews new literature from 2008-2009 regarding IVTs. An annotated bibliography of more than 150 documents, reports and published articles was constructed. No major new IVT was identified that could be added to the current list. While revised estimates of effectiveness could be undertaken, these would refine rather than cause major changes to rankings. There is little, if any, improved confidence in the estimates of effectiveness. Several European projects have attempted to develop methodologies for prioritizing IVT, however they are considered to rely too much on uncertain estimates of the potential benefits of the technology. The TAC methodology that uses a business-case approach is still regarded as the most robust approach in view of this uncertainty. Emerging issues identified included: the possibility of behavioural adaptation to IVTs by drivers; a trend by vehicle manufacturers to combine IVTs (either as a package of safety-related IVTs, or safety-related IVTs in combination with other communication, entertainment or information IVTs); an increased focus on conducting robust field operational testing of IVTs; and issues associated with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) fitment and retrofitment of IVTs. It is recommended that IVT developments should continue to be generally monitored on a very regular basis, but it may be appropriate in future to also conduct specific studies to review particular vehicle types (e.g., cars, trucks, motorcycles) or individual IVTs.

[1]  Jerzy Merkisz,et al.  Methods and procedures for testing the e-call in-vehicle unit for the purpose of its performance assessment and certification , 2009 .

[2]  Maria Staubach,et al.  Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  W P Schmidt,et al.  Sustainable management of vehicle design , 2008 .

[4]  A Birrell Stewart,et al.  Smart driving aids and their effects on driving performance and driver distraction , 2009 .

[5]  Deborah Sapper,et al.  Evaluation of Electronic Data Recorder for Incident Investigation, Driver Performance and Vehicle Maintenance , 2009 .

[6]  Sophie Cuny,et al.  Evaluation of the safety benefits of passive and/or on-board active safety applications with mass accident data-bases , 2009 .

[7]  Frank Lai,et al.  ISA-UK: intelligent speed adaptation , 2008 .

[8]  John D. Lee,et al.  Preface to the Special Section on Driver Distraction , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Steven Ashley Driving toward crashless cars. , 2008, Scientific American.

[10]  John Richardson,et al.  Planning and implementing field operational tests of intelligent transport systems: a checklist derived from the EC FESTA project , 2009 .

[11]  Sam Peltzman,et al.  The effects of automobile safety regulation: Reply , 1976 .

[12]  Stewart A. Birrell,et al.  Using on-board driver feedback systems to encourage safe, ecological and efficient driving : the Foot-LITE project , 2009 .

[13]  Brian O'Neill,et al.  Preventing Passenger Vehicle Occupant Injuries by Vehicle Design—A Historical Perspective from IIHS , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[14]  David Shinar,et al.  In-vehicle information systems to improve traffic safety in road tunnels , 2008 .

[15]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  Evaluation of electronic stability control effectiveness in Australasia. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  Using risk analysis to prioritize intelligent transport systems : variable message sign case study in Gold Coast City, Australia , 2006 .

[17]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  In-car gps navigation: engagement with and disengagement from the environment , 2008, CHI.

[18]  Jonathan M. Bunker,et al.  INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS EVALUATION: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE , 2003 .

[19]  Pietro Carlo Cacciabue,et al.  Behavioural adaptations to driver support systems: a modelling and road safety perspective , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[20]  Rune Elvik,et al.  An exploratory analysis of models for estimating the combined effects of road safety measures. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Methodological challenges and solutions in the EuroFOT project , 2009 .

[22]  David Paine,et al.  Speed limiting trials in Australia , 2009 .

[23]  Jan-Dirk Schmöcker,et al.  Special Issue on Improving Network Reliability Through ITS Technologies , 2009, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[24]  Annie Pauzie,et al.  Ergonomic Inspection of IVIS for Riders: Recommendations for Design and Safety , 2009 .

[25]  Marjan P. Hagenzieker,et al.  Effects of In-Car Support on Mental Workload and Driving Performance of Older Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Michael Paine,et al.  In-vehicle safety technologies: picking future winners! , 2008 .

[27]  Frank Lai,et al.  Speed limit adherence and its effect on road safety and climate change - final report , 2008 .

[28]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Design for Smart Driving: A Tale of Two Interfaces , 2009, HCI.

[29]  Göran Nilsson Traffic safety measures and observance. Compliance with speed limits, seat belt use and driver sobriety , 2004 .

[30]  Frank Lai,et al.  ISA UK - Intelligent Speed Adaptation - final report , 2008 .

[31]  Anke Popken DRIVERS’ RELIANCE ON LANE KEEPING ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS: EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ASSISTANCE , 2008 .