Using Time-to-Contact Information to Assess Potential Collision Modulates Both Visual and Temporal Prediction Networks

Accurate estimates of the time-to-contact (TTC) of approaching objects are crucial for survival. We used an ecologically valid driving simulation to compare and contrast the neural substrates of egocentric (head-on approach) and allocentric (lateral approach) TTC tasks in a fully factorial, event-related fMRI design. Compared to colour control tasks, both egocentric and allocentric TTC tasks activated left ventral premotor cortex/frontal operculum and inferior parietal cortex, the same areas that have previously been implicated in temporal attentional orienting. Despite differences in visual and cognitive demands, both TTC and temporal orienting paradigms encourage the use of temporally predictive information to guide behaviour, suggesting these areas may form a core network for temporal prediction. We also demonstrated that the temporal derivative of the perceptual index tau (tau-dot) held predictive value for making collision judgements and varied inversely with activity in primary visual cortex (V1). Specifically, V1 activity increased with the increasing likelihood of reporting a collision, suggesting top–down attentional modulation of early visual processing areas as a function of subjective collision. Finally, egocentric viewpoints provoked a response bias for reporting collisions, rather than no-collisions, reflecting increased caution for head-on approaches. Associated increases in SMA activity suggest motor preparation mechanisms were engaged, despite the perceptual nature of the task.

[1]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Understanding non-biological dynamics with your own premotor system , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  Geoffrey R Hammond,et al.  Hemispheric differences in temporal resolution , 1982, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Repetitive TMS of cerebellum interferes with millisecond time processing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  K. Amunts,et al.  The importance of seeing it coming: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of motion-in-depth towards the human observer , 2002, Neuroscience.

[8]  Gabriele Lohmann,et al.  Auditory what, where, and when: a sensory somatotopy in lateral premotor cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  John P. Wann,et al.  Perceiving Time to Collision Activates the Sensorimotor Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  M T Turvey,et al.  Optical information about the severity of upcoming contacts. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Cerebellum Predicts the Timing of Perceptual Events , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[14]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  The Role of the Cerebellum in Subsecond Time Perception: Evidence from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[16]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Tresilian Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  P. Tallal,et al.  Neurobiological Basis of Speech: A Case for the Preeminence of Temporal Processing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[23]  K Cheng,et al.  Human cortical regions activated by wide-field visual motion: an H2(15)O PET study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  K. Zilles,et al.  Difficulty of perceptual spatiotemporal integration modulates the neural activity of left inferior parietal cortex , 2005, Neuroscience.

[26]  K. Chang,et al.  Subregions within the Supplementary Motor Area Activated at Different Stages of Movement Preparation and Execution , 1999, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Schubotz Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  David N. Lee Guiding Movement by Coupling Taus , 1998 .

[30]  A. Nobre,et al.  The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[32]  J. Jonides,et al.  Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  What and When: Parallel and Convergent Processing in Motor Control , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Evoked Hemodynamics with fMRI , 1995, NeuroImage.

[37]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  Anna Christina Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention to instants in time , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  W H Warren,et al.  Visual control of braking: a test of the tau hypothesis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of working memory: Contributions of human brain lesion studies , 2006, Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[42]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[43]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  ã Federation of European Neuroscience Societies Heading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP) , 2022 .

[44]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  F. Vidal,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation , 2004, Science.

[47]  Marion A. Eppler,et al.  Development of Visually Guided Locomotion , 1998 .

[48]  Paul B Rock,et al.  Tau as a potential control variable for visually guided braking. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Information Used in Detecting Upcoming Collision , 2003, Perception.

[50]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  The Representation of Egomotion in the Human Brain , 2008, Current Biology.