General concepts in Hydrogeology and Geophysics related to MRS

A tight collaboration between hydrogeologists and geophysicists is necessary to achieve the most appropriate use of Geophysics in Hydrogeology, mainly for planning the geophysical activities in accordance to the hydrogeological target to be investigated and for the interpretation or translation of the geophysical documents into hydrogeological documents. For this collaboration to be fruitful it is of great importance to share a common language allowing communication feasible: geophysicists have to know the fundamentals of the hydrogeological process, and hydrogeologists have to know the fundamentals of geophysical methods. This is the main objective of this paper, where definitions of basic concepts of both disciplines related to Magnetic Resonance Sounding (MRS) are reminded. All surface geophysical methods are actually used in groundwater studies. MRS deserves special attention because of its singularity and novelty: it is the only method able to detect directly the presence of water in the underground. As research is going ahead, MRS reveals also its ability for the evaluation of hydraulic parameters, being nowadays a real alternative to the use of boreholes tests in some circumstances. The other standard surface geophysical methods are valid to determine the geometrical parameters of aquifers, and just in a few cases they allow the evaluation of hydraulic properties. The MRS method is at present limited to the investigation of the first 150 m of depth. Most groundwater catchments areas, at any geological environment, fall within the category of shallow confined or unconfined aquifers; otherwise hydrogeological research in the first 150 m is basic not only from the standpoint of groundwater supply but also for geotechnical and environmental groundwater related studies. The use of MRS can be adapted to any scale of the hydrogeological study. In regional research the main goal is the evaluation of water resources and the acquisition of parameters to make a mathematical model to the aquifer control. To achieve such a model the area in which the aquifer is situated, as well as its recharge and discharge zones, are divided into cells where the flux variables or parameters that characterise the aquifer have to be evaluated. MRS can be used to get part of these parameters adapting the sampling or distance between MRS measurements to the desired scale: cells size of kilometres or hundreds of meters. Local hydrogeological surveys are mainly focused at water extraction for human supply or for agricultural and/or industrial use, requiring a higher resolution in the methodology applied, for which MRS can play again an important role for the best location of sites for well drilling. Evaluation of hydrodynamic parameters from MRS data needs an initial calibration with known reference data, being necessary to fully understand the relation between hydrogeological and MRS parameters, for what a description of the former ones as well as a summary of the hydrological tests for its evaluation, in special of pumping tests, is presented.

[1]  C. E. Jacob,et al.  A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history , 1946 .

[2]  Dominique Bourdet,et al.  Well Test Analysis: The Use of Advanced Interpretation Models , 2002 .

[3]  J. J. D. Valsero,et al.  Propuesta metodológica para la estimación de la recarga en acuíferos carbonáticos , 2004 .

[4]  Craig T Simmons,et al.  The compleat Darcy: New lessons learned from the first English translation of les fontaines publiques de la Ville de Dijon , 2005, Ground water.

[5]  F. M. Rubio Basic theory of the Magnetic Resonance Sounding Method , 2007 .

[6]  C. V. Theis The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .

[7]  C. E. Jacob,et al.  Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer , 1955 .

[8]  J. Bernard Instruments and field work to measure a Magnetic Resonance Sounding , 2007 .

[9]  J. Roy,et al.  Use of MRS for hydrogeological system parameterization and modelling , 2007 .

[10]  D. Bourdet,et al.  A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis , 2003 .

[11]  C. E. Jacob Drawdown Test to Determine Effective Radius of Artesian Well , 1947 .

[12]  Manuel Villanueva Martínez,et al.  Pozos y acuíferos: técnicas de evaluación mediante ensayos de bombeo , 1984 .

[13]  G. Kruseman,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data , 1983 .

[14]  J. Roy,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Sounding: New Method for Ground Water Assessment , 2004, Ground water.

[15]  C. V. Theis The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream , 1941 .

[16]  A. V. Everdingen,et al.  The Skin Effect and Its Influence on the Productive Capacity of a Well , 1953 .

[17]  J. Barker A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock , 1988 .

[18]  H. H. Cooper,et al.  Drawdown in a well of large diameter , 1967 .

[19]  Tres Cantos Hydrogeological experience in the use of MRS , 2007 .

[20]  Hantush Drawdown Around a Partially Penetrating Well , 1961 .

[21]  J. Roy,et al.  MRS contribution to hydrogeological system parametrization , 2005 .

[22]  N S Boulton,et al.  THE DRAWDOWN OF THE WATER-TABLE UNDER NON-STEADY CONDITIONS NEAR A PUMPED WELL IN AN UNCONFINED FORMATION. , 1954 .

[23]  J. Roy,et al.  Hydrogeological interpretation and potential of the new magnetic resonance sounding, MRS, method , 2003 .

[24]  A. Legchenko,et al.  MRS measurements and inversion in presence of EM noise , 2007 .

[25]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Well Test Analysis , 2018, Petroleum Engineering.

[26]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Inversion of Magnetic Resonance Sounding data , 2007 .

[27]  Philippe Renard,et al.  The future of hydraulic tests , 2005 .

[28]  H. J. Ramey,et al.  Unsteady-State Pressure Distributions Created by a Well With a Single Infinite-Conductivity Vertical Fracture , 1974 .