Disease Burden Affects Outcomes in Pediatric and Young Adult B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Commercial Tisagenlecleucel: A Pediatric Real-World Chimeric Antigen Receptor Consortium Report

PURPOSE Tisagenlecleucel is a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, US Food and Drug Administration–approved for children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). The US Food and Drug Administration registration for tisagenlecleucel was based on a complete response (CR) rate of 81%, 12-month overall survival (OS) of 76%, and event-free survival (EFS) of 50%. We report clinical outcomes and analyze covariates of outcomes after commercial tisagenlecleucel. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional study of CAYA with RR B-ALL across 15 US institutions, who underwent leukapheresis shipment to Novartis for commercial tisagenlecleucel. A total of 200 patients were included in an intent-to-treat response analysis, and 185 infused patients were analyzed for survival and toxicity. RESULTS Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrates a 79% morphologic CR rate (95% CI, 72 to 84). The infused cohort had an 85% CR (95% CI, 79 to 89) and 12-month OS of 72% and EFS of 50%, with 335 days of median follow-up. Notably, 48% of patients had low-disease burden (< 5% bone marrow lymphoblasts, no CNS3, or other extramedullary disease), or undetectable disease, pretisagenlecleucel. Univariate and multivariate analyses associate high-disease burden (HB, ≥ 5% bone marrow lymphoblasts, CNS3, or non-CNS extramedullary) with inferior outcomes, with a 12-month OS of 58% and EFS of 31% compared with low-disease burden (OS; 85%, EFS; 70%) and undetectable disease (OS; 95%, EFS; 72%; P < .0001 for OS and EFS). Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity rates were 21% and 7% overall and 35% and 9% in patients with HB, respectively. CONCLUSION Commercial tisagenlecleucel in CAYA RR B-ALL demonstrates efficacy and tolerability. This first analysis of commercial tisagenlecleucel stratified by disease burden identifies HB preinfusion to associate with inferior OS and EFS and increased toxicity. ‘Real-world’ study identifies suboptimal post-CAR survival in children treated with high leukemia burden

[1]  Snehit Prabhu,et al.  Real-World Treatment of Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using Tisagenlecleucel That Is out of Specification for Commercial Release , 2020 .

[2]  Matthew J. Frigault,et al.  Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2020, Blood advances.

[3]  J. Vose,et al.  Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  David A. Williams,et al.  Toxicity and Response following CD19-specific CAR T cells in pediatric/young adult relapsed/refractory B-ALL. , 2019, Blood.

[5]  S. Grupp,et al.  ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. , 2019, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[6]  S. Ellenberg,et al.  Considerations for analysis of time-to-event outcomes subject to competing risks in veterinary clinical studies. , 2018, Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology.

[7]  K. Davis,et al.  Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B‐Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Long‐Term Follow‐up of CD19 CAR Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Jason P Fine,et al.  Practical recommendations for reporting Fine‐Gray model analyses for competing risk data , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  S. Riddell,et al.  Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. , 2017, Blood.

[11]  M. Bottai,et al.  Relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Nordic countries: prognostic factors, treatment and outcome , 2016, Haematologica.

[12]  J. Downing,et al.  Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Progress Through Collaboration. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  S. Steinberg,et al.  T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[14]  Pamela A Shaw,et al.  Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Roganović Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children , 2013, Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology.

[16]  Xiaomin Lu,et al.  Improved survival for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia between 1990 and 2005: a report from the children's oncology group. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Schrappe,et al.  Long-term outcome in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia after time-point and site-of-relapse stratification and intensified short-course multidrug chemotherapy: results of trial ALL-REZ BFM 90. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  S. Cole,et al.  Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. , 2009, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  H. Brenner,et al.  Improvement in survival in younger patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from the 1980s to the early 21st century. , 2009, Blood.

[20]  M. Loh,et al.  Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study , 2008, Leukemia.

[21]  P. Hwu,et al.  Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy — assessment and management of toxicities , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.