Exceptional hydrogen storage achieved by screening nearly half a million metal-organic frameworks

Few hydrogen adsorbents balance high usable volumetric and gravimetric capacities. Although metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have recently demonstrated progress in closing this gap, the large number of MOFs has hindered the identification of optimal materials. Here, a systematic assessment of published databases of real and hypothetical MOFs is presented. Nearly 500,000 compounds were screened computationally, and the most promising were assessed experimentally. Three MOFs with capacities surpassing that of IRMOF-20, the record-holder for balanced hydrogen capacity, are demonstrated: SNU-70, UMCM-9, and PCN-610/NU-100. Analysis of trends reveals the existence of a volumetric ceiling at ∼40 g H2 L−1. Surpassing this ceiling is proposed as a new capacity target for hydrogen adsorbents. Counter to earlier studies of total hydrogen uptake in MOFs, usable capacities in the highest-capacity materials are negatively correlated with density and volumetric surface area. Instead, capacity is maximized by increasing gravimetric surface area and porosity. This suggests that property/performance trends for total capacities may not translate to usable capacities.Considering the large number of existing synthesised and hypothesised metal-organic frameworks, determining which materials perform best for given applications remains a challenge. Here, the authors screen the usable hydrogen uptake capacities of nearly 500,000 MOFs, and find that three frameworks outperform the current record-holder.

[1]  S. Nguyen,et al.  De novo synthesis of a metal-organic framework material featuring ultrahigh surface area and gas storage capacities. , 2010, Nature chemistry.

[2]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  Rational Design of a Low-Cost, High-Performance Metal–Organic Framework for Hydrogen Storage and Carbon Capture , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces.

[3]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Attainable Volumetric Targets for Adsorption-Based Hydrogen Storage in Porous Crystals: Molecular Simulation and Machine Learning , 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

[4]  Tom K. Woo,et al.  Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship Models for Recognizing Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) with High CO2 Working Capacity and CO2/CH4 Selectivity for Methane Purification , 2016 .

[5]  Omar M Yaghi,et al.  Impact of preparation and handling on the hydrogen storage properties of Zn4O(1,4-benzenedicarboxylate)3 (MOF-5). , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  The materials genome in action: identifying the performance limits for methane storage , 2015 .

[7]  Thomas Gennett,et al.  Recommended volumetric capacity definitions and protocols for accurate, standardized and unambiguous metrics for hydrogen storage materials , 2016 .

[8]  Craig M. Brown,et al.  Record High Hydrogen Storage Capacity in the Metal-Organic Framework Ni2(m-dobdc) at Near-Ambient Temperatures. , 2018, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Understanding Volumetric and Gravimetric Hydrogen Adsorption Trade-off in Metal-Organic Frameworks. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[10]  M. Hill,et al.  Control of framework interpenetration for in situ modified hydroxyl functionalised IRMOFs. , 2012, Chemical communications.

[11]  R. Snurr,et al.  RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials , 2016 .

[12]  Youn‐Sang Bae,et al.  A Chemical Route to Activation of Open Metal Sites in the Copper-Based Metal-Organic Framework Materials HKUST-1 and Cu-MOF-2. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  R. Feynman,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , 1965 .

[14]  Andrew I. Cooper,et al.  Function-led design of new porous materials , 2015, Science.

[15]  Donald J. Siegel,et al.  High capacity hydrogen storage materials: attributes for automotive applications and techniques for materials discovery. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[16]  Tahir Cagin,et al.  Construction of hierarchically porous metal–organic frameworks through linker labilization , 2017, Nature Communications.

[17]  Lars Öhrström,et al.  Terminology of metal–organic frameworks and coordination polymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2013) , 2013 .

[18]  Peyman Z. Moghadam,et al.  Development of a Cambridge Structural Database Subset: A Collection of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Past, Present, and Future , 2017 .

[19]  Jiayi Chen,et al.  High-Throughput Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Storage at Cryogenic Temperature , 2016 .

[20]  T. Thi,et al.  Metal - Organic Frameworks: State-of-the-art Material for Gas Capture and Storage , 2016 .

[21]  Omar M Yaghi,et al.  Strategies for hydrogen storage in metal--organic frameworks. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  Jeffrey R. Long,et al.  Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage , 2014 .

[23]  Hong‐Cai Zhou,et al.  Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks , 2007 .

[24]  C. Wilmer,et al.  Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[25]  T. Huong,et al.  Metal – Organic Frameworks : State-ofthe-art Material for Gas Capture and Storage , 2016 .

[26]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Evaluating topologically diverse metal–organic frameworks for cryo-adsorbed hydrogen storage , 2016 .

[27]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  Computation-Ready, Experimental Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Tool To Enable High-Throughput Screening of Nanoporous Crystals , 2014 .

[28]  Frank Hoffmann,et al.  Preferred hydrogen adsorption sites in various MOFs--a comparative computational study. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[29]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  In silico prediction of MOFs with high deliverable capacity or internal surface area. , 2015, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[30]  Donald J. Siegel,et al.  Balancing gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen density in MOFs , 2017 .

[31]  Michael J. Cafarella,et al.  Theoretical Limits of Hydrogen Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Opportunities and Trade-Offs , 2013 .

[32]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Topologically Guided, Automated Construction of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Evaluation for Energy-Related Applications , 2017 .

[33]  Fengqi You,et al.  In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO2 capture using a genetic algorithm , 2016, Science Advances.

[34]  Jihan Kim,et al.  Computational prediction of high methane storage capacity in V-MOF-74. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[35]  Omar K. Farha,et al.  Activation of metal–organic framework materials , 2013 .

[36]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Methane Storage and Delivery in Nanoporous Materials , 2014 .

[37]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  An assessment of strategies for the development of solid-state adsorbents for vehicular hydrogen storage , 2018 .

[38]  Dan Zhao,et al.  An isoreticular series of metal-organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[39]  Tom K Woo,et al.  Rapid and Accurate Machine Learning Recognition of High Performing Metal Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[40]  I. Bruno,et al.  Cambridge Structural Database , 2002 .

[41]  Yang Ming,et al.  Ford/BASF/UM Activities in Support of the Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence , 2015 .

[42]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  High-Throughput Screening of Porous Crystalline Materials for Hydrogen Storage Capacity near Room Temperature , 2014 .

[43]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Benchmark Study of Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks under Temperature and Pressure Swing Conditions , 2018 .

[44]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  In Silico Discovery of High Deliverable Capacity Metal–Organic Frameworks , 2015 .

[45]  Michael O'Keeffe,et al.  Hydrogen Storage in Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworks , 2003, Science.

[46]  Omar M Yaghi,et al.  Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  A. Matzger,et al.  Exceptional surface area from coordination copolymers derived from two linear linkers of differing lengths , 2012 .

[48]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials , 2012 .

[49]  Outlook and challenges for hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials , 2016 .

[50]  M. P. Suh,et al.  Control of interpenetration and gas-sorption properties of metal-organic frameworks by a simple change in ligand design. , 2012, Chemistry.

[51]  Michael O'Keeffe,et al.  Systematic Design of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular MOFs and Their Application in Methane Storage , 2002, Science.

[52]  Nicolaas A. Vermeulen,et al.  Best Practices for the Synthesis, Activation, and Characterization of Metal–Organic Frameworks , 2017 .

[53]  G. Sastre,et al.  Screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks for H2 storage. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[54]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Tuning the structure and function of metal-organic frameworks via linker design. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[55]  Roland A. Fischer,et al.  Terminologie von Metall‐organischen Gerüstverbindungen und Koordinationspolymeren (IUPAC‐Empfehlungen 2013) , 2014 .

[56]  Omar M Yaghi,et al.  Exceptional H2 saturation uptake in microporous metal-organic frameworks. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[57]  Diego A. Gómez-Gualdrón,et al.  Computational Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on Stable Zirconium Building Units for Storage and Delivery of Methane , 2014 .

[58]  J. P. Olivier,et al.  Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2015 .

[59]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  In silico design of porous polymer networks: high-throughput screening for methane storage materials. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[60]  Rachel B. Getman,et al.  Review and analysis of molecular simulations of methane, hydrogen, and acetylene storage in metal-organic frameworks. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[61]  A. Matzger,et al.  Rapid Guest Exchange and Ultra-Low Surface Tension Solvents Optimize Metal-Organic Framework Activation. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.

[62]  Kenneth I. Johnson,et al.  PNNL Development and Analysis of Material-Based Hydrogen Storage Systems for the Hydrogen Storage Engineering Center of Excellence , 2016 .

[63]  Randall Q. Snurr,et al.  Energy-based descriptors to rapidly predict hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks , 2019, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering.

[64]  Matthew R. Hill,et al.  Materials Genome in Action: Identifying the Performance Limits of Physical Hydrogen Storage , 2017, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  Li-Chiang Lin,et al.  Mail-Order Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Designing Isoreticular MOF-5 Analogues Comprising Commercially Available Organic Molecules , 2013 .