Systematic Representation of Relationship Quality in Conflict and Dispute: for Construction Projects

The construction industry needs to move towards more relational procurement procedures to reduce extensive losses of value and avoid conflicts and disputes. Despite this, the actual conceptualization and assessment of relationships during conflict and dispute incidents seem to be neglected. Via a review of literature, relationship quality is suggested as a systematic framework for construction projects. General system theory is applied and a framework consistent of four layers respectively labelled as triggering, antecedent, moderation and outcome is suggested. Two different case studies are undertaken to represent the systematic framework; which verifies that changes in contracting circumstances and built environment culture can affect the identified layers. Through system reliability theories a fault tree is derived to represent a systematic framework of relationship quality. The combinations of components, causes, and events for two case studies are mapped out through fault tree. By analysing the fault tree the combination of events that lead to relationship deterioration may be identified. Consequently the progression of simple events into failure is formulized and probabilities allocated. Accordingly the importance and the contribution of these events to failure become accessible. The ability to have such indications about relationship quality may help increase performance as well as sustainable procurement.  Paper Type: Research article

[1]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain , 2002 .

[2]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Overcoming barriers to partnering through cooperative procurement procedures , 2009 .

[3]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: Comparative study of Beijing and Sydney , 2014 .

[4]  Derek K. Hitchins,et al.  Systems Engineering: A 21st Century Systems Methodology , 2007 .

[5]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects , 2014 .

[6]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[7]  Tak Wing Yiu,et al.  In Search of Sustainability: Constructability Application and Contract Management in Malaysian Industrialized Building Systems , 2013 .

[8]  Low Sui Pheng.  The extension of construction partnering for relationship marketing , 1999 .

[9]  Fremont E. Kast,et al.  Organization and management: a systems approach , 1974 .

[10]  Wei Tong Chen,et al.  Critical success factors for construction partnering in Taiwan , 2007 .

[11]  Arjun Chaudhuri,et al.  Consumption Emotion and Perceived Risk: A Macro-Analytic Approach , 1997 .

[12]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Key performance indicators for measuring construction success , 2004 .

[13]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[14]  Graham Winch,et al.  Institutional reform in British construction: partnering and private finance , 2000 .

[15]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy , 2012 .

[16]  John D. Andrews,et al.  Birnbaum's measure of component importance for noncoherent systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[17]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Using social network strategy to manage construction projects in China , 2012 .

[18]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management , 2004 .

[19]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Reconstructing Cultures for Relational Contracting , 2005 .

[20]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects , 2013 .

[21]  John Simmons,et al.  Analysis of conflict and change in construction projects , 1992 .

[22]  Arjun Chaudhuri.  Product class effects on perceived risk: The role of emotion , 1998 .

[23]  S. Austin,et al.  Never waste a good crisis: a review of progress since Rethinking Construction and thoughts for our future , 2009 .

[24]  David J. Sherwin,et al.  System Reliability Theory—Models and Statistical Methods , 1995 .

[25]  L. Pondy.  Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. , 1967 .

[26]  T. Hennig-Thurau,et al.  The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development , 1997 .

[27]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study , 2007 .

[28]  Chris Ivory,et al.  Partnering in major contracts: Paradox and metaphor , 2007 .

[29]  Matteo Giacomo Maria Kalchschmidt,et al.  Customer pressure and innovativeness: Their role in sustainable supply chain management , 2014 .

[30]  Mari Sako,et al.  Price, Quality and Trust: Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Japan , 1992 .

[31]  Cristiana Raquel Lages,et al.  The Relqual Scale: A Measure of Relationship Quality in Export Market Ventures , 2005 .

[32]  Lena E. Bygballe,et al.  Partnering relationships in construction: a literature review , 2010 .

[33]  A. Cox,et al.  ‘Fit for purpose’ contractual relations: determining a theoretical framework for construction projects , 1997 .

[34]  M. Vangel.  System Reliability Theory: Models and Statistical Methods , 1996 .

[35]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  Assessment framework for construction supply chain relationships: Development and evaluation , 2010 .

[36]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective: , 1990 .

[37]  Xianhai Meng,et al.  The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction , 2012 .