Trainee Occupational Therapists Scoring the Barthel ADL

Within medical applications there are two main types of information design; paper-based and digital information [1]. As technology is constantly changing, information within healthcare management and delivery is continually being transitioned from traditional paper documents to digital and online resources. Activity of Daily Living (ADL) charts are still predominantly paper based and are therefore prone to “human error” [2]. In light of this, an investigation has taken place into the design for reducing the amount of human error, between a paper based ADL, specifically the Barthel Index, and the same ADL created digitally. The digital ADL was developed as an online platform as this offers the best method of data capture for a large group of participants all together [3]. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usability of the Barthel Index ADL in paper format and then reproduce the same ADL digitally. This paper presents the findings of a study involving 26 participants who were familiar with ADL charts, and used three scenarios requiring them to complete both a paper ADL and a digital ADL. An evaluation was undertaken to ascertain if there were any ‘human errors’ in completing the paper ADL and also to find similarities/differences through using the digital ADL. The results from the study indicated that 22/26 participants agreed that the digital ADL was better, if not the same as a paper based ADL. Further results indicated that participants rate highly the added benefit of the digital ADL being easy to use and also that calculation of assessment scores were performed automatically. Statistically the digital BI offered a 100 % correction rate in the total calculation, in comparison to the paper based BI where it is more common for users to make mathematical calculation errors. Therefore in order to minimise handwriting and calculation errors, the digital BI proved superior than the traditional paper based method.

[1]  K. Pearson.  VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[2]  John Bigham,et al.  Recognising Activities of Daily Life Using Hierarchical Plans , 2007, EuroSSC.

[3]  D. O’Mahony,et al.  The Barthel Index: comparing inter-rater reliability between nurses and doctors in an older adult rehabilitation unit. , 2011, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[4]  F. Galton.  Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. , 1886 .

[5]  Mario A. Bochicchio,et al.  Extending Web applications with 3D features , 2011, 2011 13th IEEE International Symposium on Web Systems Evolution (WSE).

[6]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  An interactive tool for the evaluation of ECG visualisation formats , 2013, Computing in Cardiology 2013.

[7]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.

[8]  Daniel Guldenring,et al.  A simulation tool for visualizing and studying the effects of electrode misplacement on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. , 2011, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  Winfried Banzer,et al.  Activities of Daily Living and Health , 2013 .

[10]  Howard A Smithline,et al.  Errors in a busy emergency department. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? , 1988, International disability studies.

[12]  R. Ferner,et al.  The pathophysiology of medication errors: how and where they arise. , 2009, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[13]  Kenneth Rockwood,et al.  The measuring, meaning and importance of activities of daily living (ADLs) as an outcome , 2007, International Psychogeriatrics.

[14]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[15]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Barthel Index for Stroke Trials: Development, Properties, and Application , 2011, Stroke.

[16]  A J Thompson,et al.  Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  S. Stigler.  Francis Galton's Account of the Invention of Correlation , 1989 .

[19]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Evaluation of the Barthel Index Presented on Paper and Developed Digitally , 2014, ICOST.

[20]  Janet V. DeLany,et al.  Occupational therapy practice framework: domain & practice, 2nd edition. , 2008, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  ECGSIM: an interactive tool for studying the genesis of QRST waveforms , 2004, Heart.