The Validity of Using a Geographic Information System's Viewshed Function as a Predictor for the Reception of Line-of-Sight Radio Waves

A Geographic Information System (GIS) viewshed is the result of a function that determines, given a terrain model, which areas on a map can be seen from a given point(s), line or area. In the communications industry, this function has been used to model radio wave coverages and to site transceiver towers for cellular phones. However, there are errors involved with this function and, without the requisite data, it cannot account for building heights that may affect visibility in urban areas. This paper examines the ability to accurately show line-of-sight (LOS) radio wave coverages in order to establish the viability of replacing existing field methods with GIS viewshed analysis. An origin point capable of supporting a line-of-sight radio wave transmitter was chosen from within the Virginia Tech campus study area. A viewshed analysis was performed with ESRI's ArcView GIS, using this site as the observation point and a 30-meter resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) from the US Geological Survey. To check the accuracy of the viewshed, we transmitted at 27.5 GHz, a LOS frequency that has properties common in the wireless telecommunications industry. We also transmitted at 900 MHz from the same point to provide a comparison of the 27.5 GHz frequency to a non-line-of-sight radio wave. Data was then recorded using the following: a digital camera to capture the view from the data point to the transmitter, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver to pinpoint the test location, a 27.5 GHz receiver and a 900 MHz receiver to acquire the signals, and a spectrum analyzer to record the strength of both signals. The viewshed model was used as a reference map to define the area of data collection. The recorded data was then entered into the GIS where the iii visibility attribute of each point (the visual inspection recorded by the camera) was compared to the viewshed's prediction of visibility. After this comparison, footprints and heights of campus buildings were included in the model, by adding them to the ground heights of the DEM. Another viewshed analysis was performed using the same origin site and the new building height DEM as the elevation grid. This second viewshed was compared with the recorded visibility attribute and signal strength data. The use of more complete surface data was shown to have a more positive correlation with the recorded data than the previous model. The comparison of these two viewsheds demonstrated how …