Multimodal Semantic Quantity Representations: Further Evidence from Korean Sign Language

Korean deaf signers performed a number comparison task on pairs of Arabic digits. In their response times profiles, the expected magnitude effect was systematically modified by properties of number signs in Korean sign language in a culture-specific way (not observed in hearing and deaf Germans or hearing Chinese). We conclude that finger-based quantity representations are automatically activated even in simple tasks with symbolic input although this may be irrelevant and even detrimental for task performance. These finger-based numerical representations are accessed in addition to another, more basic quantity system which is evidenced by the magnitude effect. In sum, these results are inconsistent with models assuming only one single amodal representation of numerical quantity.

[1]  M. Beran Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) succeed in a test of quantity conservation , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[2]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2008 .

[3]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  A Unit-Decade Compatibility Effect in German Number Words , 2002 .

[4]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[5]  Hongbin Wang,et al.  The Effect of External Representations on Numeric Tasks , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid? , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[7]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Mind the gap between both hands: Evidence for internal finger-based number representations in children's mental calculation , 2008, Cortex.

[8]  W. Fias,et al.  Abstract representations of number: What interactions with number form do not prove and priming effects do , 2009 .

[9]  J I Campbell,et al.  On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  A. Nieder Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Elena Nicoladis,et al.  Are number gestures easier than number words for preschoolers , 2010 .

[12]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Numerical abstraction: It ain't broke , 2009 .

[13]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[14]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[16]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the Magnitude Representations of Two-Digit Numbers , 2005 .

[17]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Wim Fias,et al.  The addition of two-digit numbers: exploring carry versus no-carry problems , 2005 .

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Language effects in magnitude comparison: Small, but not irrelevant , 2005, Brain and Language.

[21]  Wim Fias,et al.  Neighbourhood effects in mental arithmetic , 2005 .

[22]  Jian Kong,et al.  The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  G. Hitch,et al.  Separate roles for executive and phonological components of working memory in mental arithmetic , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[24]  K Moeller,et al.  Two-digit number processing: holistic, decomposed or hybrid? A computational modelling approach , 2011, Psychological research.

[25]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurations , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Frank Domahs,et al.  The Influence of Implicit Hand-Based Representations on Mental Arithmetic , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[27]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Finger Numeral Representations: More than Just Another Symbolic Code , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[28]  Andrea Bender,et al.  Fingers as a Tool for Counting – Naturally Fixed or Culturally Flexible? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[29]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: Number and value of the carry , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  M. McCloskey Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia , 1992, Cognition.

[31]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the development of the mental number line: more, less, or never holistic with increasing age? , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[32]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[33]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures , 2010, Cognition.

[34]  S. Göbel,et al.  Finger Usage and Arithmetic in Adults with Math Difficulties: Evidence From a Case Report , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[35]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[36]  Karin Kucian,et al.  A developmental model of number representation , 2009 .

[37]  M McCloskey,et al.  Representing and using numerical information. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[38]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  An encoding-complex approach to numerical cognition in Chinese-English bilinguals. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[39]  Frank Domahs,et al.  What makes multiplication facts difficult. Problem size or neighborhood consistency? , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[40]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[41]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students , 2007, PLoS biology.

[42]  D. Norman,et al.  A representational analysis of numeration systems , 1995, Cognition.

[43]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[44]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Categorical and continuous - disentangling the neural correlates of the carry effect in multi-digit addition , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[46]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Neighborhood consistency and memory for number facts , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the perceptual generality of the unit-decade compatibility effect. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[48]  Frank Domahs,et al.  To carry or not to carry--is this the question? Disentangling the carry effect in multi-digit addition. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish , 2011, Cognition.

[50]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  Menatal addition: A test of three verification models , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[51]  Wim Fias,et al.  Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Number recognition in different formats , 2004 .

[53]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 12 Cognitive Number Processing: An Encoding-Complex Perspective , 1992 .

[54]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Architectures for numerical cognition , 1994, Cognition.

[55]  S. Dehaene Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .