Who Will Tweet More? Finding Information Feeders in Twitter

Twitter is an important source of information to users for its giant user group and rapid information diffusion but also made it hard to track topics in oceans of tweets. Such situation points the way to consider the task of finding information feeders, a finer-grained user group than domain experts. Information feeders refer to a crowd of topic tracers that share interests in a certain topic and provide related and follow-up information. In this study, we explore a wide range of features to find Twitter users who will tweet more about the topic after a time-point within a machine learning framework. The features are mainly extracted from the user’s history tweets for that we believe user’s tweet decision depends most on his history activities. We considered four feature families: activeness, timeliness, interaction and user profile. From our results, activeness in user’s history data is most useful. Besides that, we concluded people who gain social influence and make quick response to the topic are more likely to post more topic-related tweets.

[1]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  10 Bits of Surprise: Detecting Malicious Users with Minimum Information , 2015, CIKM.

[3]  Eduard H. Hovy,et al.  Weakly Supervised User Profile Extraction from Twitter , 2014, ACL.

[4]  Chao Yang,et al.  Using Personal Traits For Brand Preference Prediction , 2015, EMNLP.

[5]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  Overview of the TREC-2014 Microblog Track , 2014, TREC.

[6]  Aron Culotta,et al.  Predicting the Demographics of Twitter Users from Website Traffic Data , 2015, AAAI.

[7]  Svitlana Volkova,et al.  Inferring User Political Preferences from Streaming Communications , 2014, ACL.

[8]  Kyumin Lee,et al.  You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users , 2010, CIKM.

[9]  Nikolaos Aletras,et al.  An analysis of the user occupational class through Twitter content , 2015, ACL.

[10]  Ralf Herbrich,et al.  Predicting Information Spreading in Twitter , 2010 .

[11]  Miles Osborne,et al.  RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[12]  Trevor Cohn,et al.  A user-centric model of voting intention from Social Media , 2013, ACL.

[13]  Ting Wang,et al.  Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in twitter , 2013, SIGIR.

[14]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Finding and assessing social media information sources in the context of journalism , 2012, CHI.

[15]  Dong Nguyen,et al.  "How Old Do You Think I Am?" A Study of Language and Age in Twitter , 2013, ICWSM.

[16]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[17]  Michael Gamon,et al.  Predicting Responses to Microblog Posts , 2012, NAACL.

[18]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Classifying latent user attributes in twitter , 2010, SMUC '10.

[19]  David Jurgens,et al.  That's What Friends Are For: Inferring Location in Online Social Media Platforms Based on Social Relationships , 2013, ICWSM.

[20]  M. Narasimha Murty,et al.  Autoregressive Model for Users' Retweeting Profiles , 2015, SocInfo.