Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement

Local motion is known to produce strong illusory displacement in the perceived position of globally static objects. For example, if a dot-cloud or grating drifts to the left within a stationary aperture, the perceived position of the whole aperture will also be shifted to the left. Previously, we used a simple tracking task to demonstrate that active control over the global position of an object did not eliminate this form of illusion. Here, we used a new iPad task to directly compare the magnitude of illusory displacement under active and passive conditions. In the active condition, participants guided a drifting Gabor patch along a virtual slalom course by using the tilt control of an iPad. The task was to position the patch so that it entered each gate at the direct center, and we used the left/right deviations from that point as our dependent measure. In the passive condition, participants watched playback of standardized trajectories along the same course. We systematically varied deviation from midpoint at gate entry, and participants made 2AFC left/right judgments. We fitted cumulative normal functions to individual distributions and extracted the point of subjective equality (PSE) as our dependent measure. To our surprise, the magnitude of displacement was consistently larger under active than under passive conditions. Importantly, control conditions ruled out the possibility that such amplification results from lack of motor control or differences in global trajectories as performance estimates were equivalent in the two conditions in the absence of local motion. Our results suggest that the illusion penetrates multiple levels of the perception-action cycle, indicating that one important direction for the future of perceptual illusions may be to more fully explore their influence during active vision.

[1]  Andrei Gorea,et al.  On the Perceptual-motor Dissociation , 2022 .

[2]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Modularity in the motion system: independent oculomotor and perceptual processing of brief moving stimuli. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Astros Chatziastros,et al.  Gaze-eccentricity effects on road position and steering. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[7]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Behavior-oriented vision for biomimetic flight control , 2002 .

[8]  Gerrit W. Maus,et al.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  David Whitney,et al.  The motion-induced shift in the perceived location of a grating also shifts its aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[10]  P. Thier,et al.  The Cerebellum Updates Predictions about the Visual Consequences of One's Behavior , 2008, Current Biology.

[11]  T. Poggio,et al.  A parallel algorithm for real-time computation of optical flow , 1989, Nature.

[12]  Heinrich H. Biilthoff Drosophila Mutants Disturbed in Visual Orientation II. Mutants Affected in Movement and Position Computation , 1982 .

[13]  Chang-Bing Huang,et al.  Transitions between Central and Peripheral Vision Create Spatial/Temporal Distortions: A Hypothesis Concerning the Perceived Break of the Curveball , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  A. Bastian Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[16]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Gorea,et al.  On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations. , 2010, Seeing and perceiving.

[18]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Motion and position coding , 2007, Vision Research.

[19]  V. Franz,et al.  Action does not resist visual illusions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[21]  D. Carey,et al.  Do action systems resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Robert J. Moorhead,et al.  Visualization of fluid flows in virtual environments , 2004, J. Vis..

[23]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  M. Fahle,et al.  Effects of visual illusions on grasping. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  R. Welch Perceptual Modification: Adapting to Altered Sensory Environments , 1978 .

[26]  Heinrich Bülthoff,et al.  Drosophila mutants disturbed in visual orientation , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  Kiyoshi Nosu,et al.  An immediate feedback video production system for a table tennis class , 2009, J. Vis..

[28]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[29]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects , 2004, Vision Research.

[30]  Kazumichi Matsumiya,et al.  Moving One’s Own Body Part Induces a Motion Aftereffect Anchored to the Body Part , 2014, Current Biology.

[31]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  Compensatory head roll in the blowfly Calliphora during flight , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between perception and action? , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  David Whitney,et al.  Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli , 2002 .

[35]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Motion-Sensitive Neurones in V5/MT Modulate Perceived Spatial Position , 2004, Current Biology.

[36]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  The perceived position shift of a pattern that contains internal motion is accompanied by a change in the pattern’s apparent size and shape , 2007, Vision Research.

[37]  Amir C. Akhavan,et al.  Parametric Population Representation of Retinal Location: Neuronal Interaction Dynamics in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Driving in the future: temporal visuomotor adaptation and generalization. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[40]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  A theory of the pattern induced flight orientation of the fly Musca domestica II , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  S J Anderson,et al.  Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Richard Dyde,et al.  Why do some perceptual illusions affect visually guided action, when others don't? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  K. Duncker,et al.  Über induzierte Bewegung , 1929 .

[46]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  On robots and flies: Modeling the visual orientation behavior of flies , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[48]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[49]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Spatial phase and frequency in motion capture of random-dot patterns. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[50]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[51]  M Ito,et al.  Neurophysiological aspects of the cerebellar motor control system. , 1970, International journal of neurology.

[52]  David Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Analogous motion illusion in man and fly , 1979, Nature.

[54]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  A parallel algorithm for real-time decision making: A rough set approach , 1996, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[55]  Kenneth R. Boff,et al.  Vernier offset produced by rotary target motion , 1976 .

[56]  George Mather,et al.  Motion-induced position shifts occur after motion integration , 2009, Vision Research.

[57]  David Whitney,et al.  Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[58]  Welber Marinovic,et al.  The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception , 2012, Vision Research.

[59]  Ian M Thornton,et al.  The onset repulsion effect. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[60]  Fabrizio Mura,et al.  Visual control of altitude and speed in a flying agent , 1994 .

[61]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Active Control Does Not Eliminate Motion-Induced Illusory Displacement , 2011, APGV '11.

[62]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Insect inspired behaviours for the autonomous control of mobile robots , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[63]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  H. Ashida Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  Nicola Bruno,et al.  When does action resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided action , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The motion aftereffect , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[69]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays in manual tracking: evidence against the Smith Predictor model of human visually guided action , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[70]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[71]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  Makoto Ichikawa,et al.  Reduction of the flash-lag effect in terms of active observation , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[73]  J. Tresilian Hitting a moving target: Perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[74]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010 , 2011, Vision Research.

[75]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[76]  David Whitney,et al.  Second-order motion shifts perceived position , 2006, Vision Research.

[77]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Action beyond our grasp , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  Y. Dan,et al.  Asymmetry in Visual Cortical Circuits Underlying Motion-Induced Perceptual Mislocalization , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Local motion inside an object affects pointing less than smooth pursuit , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[80]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  Analogous Mechanisms Compensate for Neural Delays in the Sensory and the Motor Pathways Evidence from Motor Flash-Lag , 2003, Current Biology.

[81]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  Observer’s control of the moving stimulus increases the flash-lag effect , 2009, Vision Research.

[82]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion-Dependent Representation of Space in Area MT+ , 2013, Neuron.

[83]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  A computational model of four regions of the cerebellum based on feedback-error learning , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[85]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Backward position shift in apparent motion. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[86]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli , 2007, Vision Research.