Does age change the distribution of visual attention? A comment on McCalley, Bouwhuis, and Juola (1995).

A paper by McCalley, Bouwhuis, and Juola (1995) suggested differences between younger and older adults in the use of visual cues. Furthermore, they reported these differences could largely be attributed to diminished (peripheral) visual processing capacities of elderly adults. Here, we reanalyze the data of McCalley and colleagues emphasizing relative rather than absolute differences. We find that when doing so, the data do not reveal differences in the way older and younger adults transiently allocate attention during visual search. Contrary to the conclusions of McCalley and colleagues, the similarity between the younger and older observers is therefore independent of the characteristics of the visual information. Furthermore, in our view the data suggest that older adults have foveal rather than peripheral visual processing difficulties. The results reemphasize the importance of the analytical approach taken in aging research. We discuss the difficulties and relevance of controlling and separating visual and attentional factors in age-related studies.

[1]  J. Szlyk,et al.  Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[4]  J. Myerson,et al.  The information-loss model: a mathematical theory of age-related cognitive slowing. , 1990, Psychological review.

[5]  F. W. Weymouth Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Cerella Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  The complexity of age × complexity functions: Comment on Charness and Campbell (1988). , 1988 .

[8]  Richard A. Greenberg,et al.  Statistics and Experimental Design , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[9]  S. C. Pearce,et al.  Statistics and Experimental Design. 2nd Edition. , 1981 .

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  S M Anstis,et al.  Letter: A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  L. T. McCalley,et al.  Age changes in the distribution of visual attention. , 1995, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[13]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Attentional capture and aging: implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[14]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search. , 1998, Experimental aging research.

[15]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[16]  C. Mckenzie,et al.  Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  T. Salthouse A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[18]  A. Hartley,et al.  Adult age differences in the inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1995, Psychology and aging.