Society Functions Best with an Intermediate Level of Creativity

In a society, a proportion of the individuals can benefit from creativity without being creative themselves by copying the creators. This paper uses an agent-based model of cultural evolution to investigate how society is affected by different levels of individual creativity. We performed a time series analysis of the mean fitness of ideas across the artificial society varying both the percentage of creators, C, and how creative they are, p using two discounting methods. Both analyses revealed a valley in the adaptive landscape, indicating a tradeoff between C and p. The results suggest that excess creativity at the individual level can be detrimental at the level of the society because creators invest in unproven ideas at the expense of propagating proven ideas.

[1]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Guiding creative talent , 1962 .

[2]  Abraham H. Maslow,et al.  Creativity in self-actualizing people. , 1962 .

[3]  R. McDonald,et al.  The Value of Waiting to Invest , 1982 .

[4]  K. Laland,et al.  Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. , 2006, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Peter Bryant,et al.  The price of greatness , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Brian Hazlehurst,et al.  Learning in the Cultural Process , 2000 .

[7]  N. Andreasen.  Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. , 1987, The American journal of psychiatry.

[8]  Liane Gabora,et al.  A Day in the Life of a Meme. , 1996, Philosophica.

[9]  Liane Gabora,et al.  The artist loft effect in the clustering 'creative types': a computer simulation , 2009, C&C '09.

[10]  L. Gabora.  Meme and Variations: A Computational Model of Cultural Evolution , 1995 .

[11]  David H. Cropley,et al.  Engineering Creativity: A Systems Concept of Functional Creativity , 2005 .

[12]  Michael L. Best,et al.  How Culture Can Guide Evolution: An Inquiry into Gene/Meme Enhancement and Opposition , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[13]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  How Learning Can Guide Evolution , 1996, Complex Syst..

[14]  Anna Craft,et al.  Creativity in Schools : Tensions and Dilemmas , 2005 .

[15]  Paul G. Higgs.  The mimetic transition: a simulation study of the evolution of learning by imitation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  F. Goodwin.  Manic-Depressive Illness , 1990 .

[17]  Liane Gabora,et al.  How creative should creators be to optimize the evolution of ideas? : A computational model , 2009 .

[18]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Culture evolves , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[20]  M. Field.  Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity , 1996 .

[21]  C. Rogers.  Toward a theory of creativity. , 1954 .

[22]  M. Feldman,et al.  Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. , 1981, Monographs in population biology.

[23]  Christina L. Scott,et al.  Teachers' Biases Toward Creative Children , 1999 .

[24]  Liane Gabora,et al.  How Creative Should Creators Be To Optimize the Evolution of Ideas? A Computational Model , 2009, DCM.

[25]  Michael L. Best,et al.  Adaptive value within natural language discourse , 2006 .

[26]  Frank J. Sulloway.  Born to Rebel , 1996 .

[27]  Liane Gabora,et al.  Relationship between Creativity, Imitation, and Cultural Diversity , 2014, Int. J. Softw. Informatics.

[28]  A. Flaherty.  Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Seana Moran,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity: The Roles of Creativity in Society , 2010 .

[30]  E. Torrance,et al.  Education and the Creative Potential , 1964 .