QSAR Toolbox – workflow and major functionalities*

Abstract The OECD QSAR Toolbox is a software application intended to be used by governments, the chemical industry and other stakeholders in filling gaps in (eco)toxicity data needed for assessing the hazards of chemicals. The development and release of the Toolbox is a cornerstone in the computerization of hazard assessment, providing an ‘all inclusive’ tool for the application of category approaches, such as read-across and trend analysis, in a single software application, free of charge. The Toolbox incorporates theoretical knowledge, experimental data and computational tools from various sources into a logical workflow. The main steps of this workflow are substance identification, identification of relevant structural characteristics and potential toxic mechanisms of interaction (i.e. profiling), identification of other chemicals that have the same structural characteristics and/or mechanism (i.e. building a category), data collection for the chemicals in the category and use of the existing experimental data to fill the data gap(s). The description of the Toolbox workflow and its main functionalities is the scope of the present article.

[1]  J. McFarland,et al.  On the parabolic relationship between drug potency and hydrophobicity. , 1970, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  S. Free,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL CONTRIBUTION TO STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY STUDIES. , 1964, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  H. Meyer.  Zur Theorie der Alkoholnarkose , 1899, Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie.

[4]  Terry W Schultz.  Gilman D. Veith (1944–2013) – A dedication , 2014, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[5]  L. Hammett.  The Effect of Structure upon the Reactions of Organic Compounds. Benzene Derivatives , 1937 .

[6]  S H Unger,et al.  On model building in structure-activity relationships. A reexamination of adrenergic blocking activity of beta-halo-beta-arylalkylamines. , 1973, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  Joachim Doll,et al.  Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development , 2021, International Organization.

[8]  J. Blake,et al.  On the Connection between Chemical Constitution and Physiological Action , 1886, Nature.

[9]  Manfred Fleischer,et al.  Testing Costs and Testing Capacity According to the REACH Requirements - Results of a Survey of Independent and Corporate GLP Laboratories in the EU and Switzerland , 2007 .

[10]  S. Dimitrov,et al.  Chapter 15:An Introduction to Read-Across for the Prediction of the Effects of Chemicals , 2010 .

[11]  Stefan H. Unger,et al.  Model building in structure-activity relations. Reexamination of adrenergic blocking activity of .beta.-halo-.beta.-arylalkylamines , 1973 .

[12]  R. Diderichs.  Chapter 16:Tools for Category Formation and Read-Across: Overview of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox , 2010 .

[13]  James W. McFarland,et al.  Parabolic relation between drug potency and hydrophobicity , 1970 .

[14]  U. Epa,et al.  Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics , 2000 .

[15]  J. Jaworska,et al.  Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  J. Topliss,et al.  Chance correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis , 1972 .

[17]  L. Hammett,et al.  Some Relations between Reaction Rates and Equilibrium Constants. , 1935 .

[18]  Toshio Fujita,et al.  The Correlation of Biological Activity of Plant Growth Regulators and Chloromycetin Derivatives with Hammett Constants and Partition Coefficients , 1963 .

[19]  E. Overton.  Studien über die Narkose : zugleich ein Beitrag zur allgemeinen Pharmakologie , 1901 .

[20]  R. M. Muir,et al.  Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hammett Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients , 1962, Nature.

[21]  L. Hammett,et al.  The Effect of Structure Upon the Reactions of Organic Compounds. Temperature and Solvent Influences , 1936 .