Vehicle-to-Vehicle Forwarding in Green Roadside Infrastructure

Smart scheduling can be used to reduce infrastructure-to-vehicle energy costs in delay-tolerant vehicular networks. In this paper, we show that, by combining this with vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) forwarding, downlink (DL) traffic schedules can be generated, whose energy costs are lower than that in the single-hop case. This is accomplished by having the roadside units (RSUs) dynamically forward packets through vehicles, which are in energy-favorable locations. This paper considers both constant bit rate (CBR) and variable bit rate (VBR) air-interface options. We first derive offline schedulers for the DL RSU energy usage when V2V forwarding is added to RSU-to-vehicle communication. Both in-channel and off-channel forwarding cases are considered. The CBR and VBR cases are obtained using integer linear programming (ILP) and time-expanded graph (TEG) formulations, respectively. These schedulers provide lower bounds on energy performance and are used for comparisons with a variety of proposed online scheduling algorithms. The first algorithm is based on a greedy local optimization (GLOA). A version of this algorithm, which uses a minimum-cost flow graph (MCFG) scheduler, is also introduced. A more sophisticated algorithm is then proposed, which is based on a finite-window group optimization (FWGO). Results from various experiments show that the proposed algorithms can generate traffic schedules with much improved DL energy requirements compared with the case where V2V packet forwarding is not used. The performance improvements are particularly strong when under heavy loading conditions and when the variation in vehicle communication requirements or vehicle speed is high. Results that compare the proposed algorithms with conventional nonenergy-aware schedulers are also presented.

[1]  Moritz Killat,et al.  Analysis and design of effective and low-overhead transmission power control for VANETs , 2008, VANET '08.

[2]  Weili Wu,et al.  Energy-efficient roadside unit scheduling for maintaining connectivity in vehicle ad-hoc network , 2011, ICUIMC '11.

[3]  Gongjun Yan,et al.  Dynamic Adaptation of Joint Transmission Power and Contention Window in VANET , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[4]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .

[5]  Terence D. Todd,et al.  Downlink Traffic Scheduling in Green Vehicular Roadside Infrastructure , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Giovanni Pau,et al.  Co-operative downloading in vehicular ad-hoc wireless networks , 2005, Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services.

[7]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Extending drive-thru data access by vehicle-to-vehicle relay , 2008, VANET '08.

[8]  Wanjiun Liao,et al.  On Cooperative and Opportunistic Channel Access for Vehicle to Roadside (V2R) Communications , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[9]  Erik G. Ström,et al.  Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p MAC Method for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  Narottam Chand,et al.  Data Scheduling in VANETs : A Review , 2010 .

[11]  Mustafa K. Mehmet Ali,et al.  A Performance Modeling of Connectivity in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  Josep Domingo-Ferrer,et al.  A Scalable Robust Authentication Protocol for Secure Vehicular Communications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Balázs Kotnyek,et al.  An annotated overview of dynamic network flows , 2003 .

[14]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  A measurement study of vehicular internet access using in situ Wi-Fi networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[15]  Guillermo Acosta-Marum,et al.  Wave: A tutorial , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Yu Wang,et al.  Routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey , 2007, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[17]  Joan García-Haro,et al.  Control-based scheduling with QoS support for vehicle to infrastructure communications , 2009, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[18]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Drive-thru Internet: IEEE 802.11b for "automobile" users , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[19]  Jing Zhao,et al.  On scheduling vehicle-roadside data access , 2007, VANET '07.

[20]  Terence D. Todd,et al.  Traffic Scheduling for Energy Sustainable Vehicular Infrastructure , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[21]  Shie-Yuan Wang The effects of wireless transmission range on path lifetime in vehicle-formed mobile ad hoc networks on highways , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[22]  José Santa,et al.  On the Design of Efficient Vehicular Applications , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[23]  Reinhard German,et al.  A computationally inexpensive empirical model of IEEE 802.11p radio shadowing in urban environments , 2011, 2011 Eighth International Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services.